Machine learning and the prediction of suicide in psychiatric populations: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Pigoni, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
Delvecchio, Giuseppe [2 ]
Turtulici, Nunzio [3 ]
Madonna, Domenico [2 ]
Pietrini, Pietro [4 ]
Cecchetti, Luca [1 ]
Brambilla, Paolo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, Social & Affect Neurosci Grp, MoMiLab, Lucca, Italy
[2] Osped Maggiore Policlin, Fdn IRCCS CaGranda, Dept Neurosci & Mental Hlth, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Pathophysiol & Transplantat, Milan, Italy
[4] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, MoMiLab, Lucca, Italy
关键词
MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; RISK-FACTORS; SELF-HARM; DECISION-TREE; SUBSTANCE USE; IDENTIFICATION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; IDEATION; WOMEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1038/s41398-024-02852-9
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising tool to enhance suicidal prediction. However, as many large-sample studies mixed psychiatric and non-psychiatric populations, a formal psychiatric diagnosis emerged as a strong predictor of suicidal risk, overshadowing more subtle risk factors specific to distinct populations. To overcome this limitation, we conducted a systematic review of ML studies evaluating suicidal behaviors exclusively in psychiatric clinical populations. A systematic literature search was performed from inception through November 17, 2022 on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus following the PRISMA guidelines. Original research using ML techniques to assess the risk of suicide or predict suicide attempts in the psychiatric population were included. An assessment for bias risk was performed using the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines. About 1032 studies were retrieved, and 81 satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included for qualitative synthesis. Clinical and demographic features were the most frequently employed and random forest, support vector machine, and convolutional neural network performed better in terms of accuracy than other algorithms when directly compared. Despite heterogeneity in procedures, most studies reported an accuracy of 70% or greater based on features such as previous attempts, severity of the disorder, and pharmacological treatments. Although the evidence reported is promising, ML algorithms for suicidal prediction still present limitations, including the lack of neurobiological and imaging data and the lack of external validation samples. Overcoming these issues may lead to the development of models to adopt in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to boost a field that holds the potential to critically impact suicide mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review on machine learning and deep learning techniques in cancer survival prediction
    Deepa, P.
    Gunavathi, C.
    PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2022, 174 : 62 - 71
  • [32] Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Prognostic Prediction of Dental Caries: A Systematic Review
    Reyes, Lilian Toledo
    Knorst, Jessica Klockner
    Ortiz, Fernanda Ruffo
    Ardenghi, Thiago Machado
    CARIES RESEARCH, 2022, 56 (03) : 161 - 170
  • [33] MACHINE LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION IN LUNG CANCER PREDICTION - A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Oentoro, Janice
    Prahastya, Rafif
    Pratama, Rendy
    Meiliana
    Fajar, Muhamad
    2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION, ICAIIC, 2023, : 435 - 439
  • [34] Cervical cancer survival prediction by machine learning algorithms: a systematic review
    Milad Rahimi
    Atieh Akbari
    Farkhondeh Asadi
    Hassan Emami
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [35] PREDICTION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS PROGRESSION USING MACHINE LEARNING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Castagno, Simone
    Gompels, Benjamin
    Strangmark, Estelle
    Robertson-Waters, Eve
    Birch, Mark
    van der Schaar, Mihaela
    McCaskie, Andrew
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 : S68 - S69
  • [36] Machine Learning for public transportation demand prediction: A Systematic Literature Review
    di Torrepadula, Franca Rocco
    Napolitano, Enea Vincenzo
    Di Martino, Sergio
    Mazzocca, Nicola
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 137
  • [37] Machine learning methods for the prediction of treatment outcome in psoriasis: a systematic review
    Haw, William W. Y.
    Hussain, Amaani B.
    Reynolds, Nick J.
    Griffiths, Christopher E. M.
    Peek, Niels
    Warren, Richard B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 187 : 49 - 50
  • [38] Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review
    Naemi, Amin
    Schmidt, Thomas
    Mansourvar, Marjan
    Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad
    Ebrahimi, Ali
    Wiil, Uffe Kock
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [39] A systematic review for MOOC dropout prediction from the perspective of machine learning
    Chen, Jing
    Fang, Bei
    Zhang, Hao
    Xue, Xia
    INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 32 (05) : 1642 - 1655
  • [40] Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review
    Van Eetvelde, Hans
    Mendonca, Luciana D.
    Ley, Christophe
    Seil, Romain
    Tischer, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 8 (01)