Machine learning and the prediction of suicide in psychiatric populations: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Pigoni, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
Delvecchio, Giuseppe [2 ]
Turtulici, Nunzio [3 ]
Madonna, Domenico [2 ]
Pietrini, Pietro [4 ]
Cecchetti, Luca [1 ]
Brambilla, Paolo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, Social & Affect Neurosci Grp, MoMiLab, Lucca, Italy
[2] Osped Maggiore Policlin, Fdn IRCCS CaGranda, Dept Neurosci & Mental Hlth, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Pathophysiol & Transplantat, Milan, Italy
[4] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, MoMiLab, Lucca, Italy
关键词
MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; RISK-FACTORS; SELF-HARM; DECISION-TREE; SUBSTANCE USE; IDENTIFICATION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; IDEATION; WOMEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1038/s41398-024-02852-9
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising tool to enhance suicidal prediction. However, as many large-sample studies mixed psychiatric and non-psychiatric populations, a formal psychiatric diagnosis emerged as a strong predictor of suicidal risk, overshadowing more subtle risk factors specific to distinct populations. To overcome this limitation, we conducted a systematic review of ML studies evaluating suicidal behaviors exclusively in psychiatric clinical populations. A systematic literature search was performed from inception through November 17, 2022 on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus following the PRISMA guidelines. Original research using ML techniques to assess the risk of suicide or predict suicide attempts in the psychiatric population were included. An assessment for bias risk was performed using the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines. About 1032 studies were retrieved, and 81 satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included for qualitative synthesis. Clinical and demographic features were the most frequently employed and random forest, support vector machine, and convolutional neural network performed better in terms of accuracy than other algorithms when directly compared. Despite heterogeneity in procedures, most studies reported an accuracy of 70% or greater based on features such as previous attempts, severity of the disorder, and pharmacological treatments. Although the evidence reported is promising, ML algorithms for suicidal prediction still present limitations, including the lack of neurobiological and imaging data and the lack of external validation samples. Overcoming these issues may lead to the development of models to adopt in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to boost a field that holds the potential to critically impact suicide mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine learning and the prediction of suicide in psychiatric populations: a systematic review
    Alessandro Pigoni
    Giuseppe Delvecchio
    Nunzio Turtulici
    Domenico Madonna
    Pietro Pietrini
    Luca Cecchetti
    Paolo Brambilla
    Translational Psychiatry, 14
  • [2] Machine learning for genetic prediction of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review
    Bracher-Smith, Matthew
    Crawford, Karen
    Escott-Price, Valentina
    MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 26 (01) : 70 - 79
  • [3] Machine learning for genetic prediction of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review
    Matthew Bracher-Smith
    Karen Crawford
    Valentina Escott-Price
    Molecular Psychiatry, 2021, 26 : 70 - 79
  • [4] Machine Learning for Hypertension Prediction: a Systematic Review
    Gabriel F. S. Silva
    Thales P. Fagundes
    Bruno C. Teixeira
    Alexandre D. P. Chiavegatto Filho
    Current Hypertension Reports, 2022, 24 : 523 - 533
  • [5] Machine Learning for Hypertension Prediction: a Systematic Review
    Silva, Gabriel F. S.
    Fagundes, Thales P.
    Teixeira, Bruno C.
    Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre D. P.
    CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2022, 24 (11) : 523 - 533
  • [6] Machine Learning and Neurosurgical Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review
    Senders, Joeky T.
    Staples, Patrick C.
    Karhade, Aditya V.
    Zaki, Mark M.
    Gormley, William B.
    Broekman, Marike L. D.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Arnaout, Omar
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 109 : 476 - +
  • [7] Machine Learning and Surgical Outcomes Prediction: A Systematic Review
    Elfanagely, Omar
    Toyoda, Yoshilzo
    Othman, Sammy
    Mellia, Joseph A.
    Basta, Marten
    Liu, Tony
    Kording, Konrad
    Ungar, Lyle
    Fischer, John P.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 264 : 346 - 361
  • [8] Machine Learning and Prediction of Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review
    Santangelo, Omar Enzo
    Gentile, Vito
    Pizzo, Stefano
    Giordano, Domiziana
    Cedrone, Fabrizio
    MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE EXTRACTION, 2023, 5 (01): : 175 - 198
  • [9] Machine Learning in the Prediction of Trauma Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Zhang, Timothy
    Nikouline, Anton
    Lightfoot, David
    Nolan, Brodie
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (05) : 440 - 455
  • [10] Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations
    Bernert, Rebecca A.
    Hilberg, Amanda M.
    Melia, Ruth
    Kim, Jane Paik
    Shah, Nigam H.
    Abnousi, Freddy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (16) : 1 - 25