How platforms govern: Social regulation in digital capitalism

被引:23
|
作者
Toernberg, Petter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social & Behav Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Neuchatel, Inst Geog, Neuchatel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social & Behav Sci, Postbus 15629, NL-1001 NC Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Digital capitalism; platformization; regulation theory; neoliberalism; technopolitics; GIG ECONOMY; BIG DATA; POLITICS; TRANSFORMATION; DISRUPTION; CRITIQUE; MEDIA; LABOR; UBER;
D O I
10.1177/20539517231153808
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The rise of digital platforms has in recent years redefined contemporary capitalism-provoking discussions on whether platformization should be understood as bringing an altogether new form of capitalism, or as merely a continuation and intensification of existing neoliberal trends. This paper draws on regulation theory to examine social regulation in digital capitalism, arguing for understanding digital capitalism as continuities of existing capitalist trends coming to produce discontinuities. The paper makes three main arguments. First, it situates digital capitalism as a continuation of longer running post-Fordist trends of financialization, digitalization, and privatization-converging in the emergence of digital proprietary markets, owned and regulated by transnational platform companies. Second, as the platform model is founded on monopolizing regulation, platforms come into direct competition with states and public institutions, which they pursue through a set of distinct technopolitical strategies to claim power to govern-resulting in a geographically variegated process of institutional transformation. Third, while the digital proprietary markets are continuities of existing trends, they bring new pressures and affordances, thus producing discontinuities in social regulation. We examine such discontinuities in relation to three aspects of social regulation: (a) from neoliberalism to techno-feudalism; (b) from Taylorist hierarchies toward algorithmic herds and technoliberal subjectivity; and (c) from postmodernity toward an automated consumer culture.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can self-regulation save digital platforms?
    Cusumano, Michael A.
    Gawer, Annabelle
    Yoffie, David B.
    INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2021, 30 (05) : 1259 - 1285
  • [32] Impact of Regulation and the Digital Markets Act on Competing Platforms
    Maille, Patrick
    Tuffin, Bruno
    NETWORK GAMES, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, NETGCOOP 2024, 2025, 15185 : 73 - 82
  • [33] Digital platforms and the rise of global regulation of hate speech
    Cavaliere, Paolo
    CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL, 2019, 8 (02) : 282 - 304
  • [34] Evolutionary Analysis of the Regulation of Data Abuse in Digital Platforms
    Wang, Zhen
    Yuan, Chunhui
    Li, Xiaolong
    SYSTEMS, 2023, 11 (04):
  • [35] Innovative development and regulation of digital financial platforms in China
    Huang, Zhuo
    Zhu, Li
    CHINA ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2022, 15 (02) : 216 - 230
  • [36] The regulation and governance of digital platforms: a systematic literature review
    Seto, Kenzo Soares
    EPTIC, 2021, 23 (03): : 223 - 250
  • [37] Digital Capitalism: social fragility, exploitation, and technological solutionism
    Gonzalez, Aitor Jimenez
    Menendez de Llano, Cesar Rendueles
    TEKNOKULTURA: REVISTA DE CULTURA DIGITAL Y MOVIMIENTOS SOCIALES, 2020, 17 (02): : 95 - 101
  • [38] Peers Inc: How People and Platforms Are Inventing the Collaborative Economy and Reinventing Capitalism
    Dowell, Meghan
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2015, 140 (08) : 81 - 82
  • [39] How Digital Platforms Compete Against Diverse Rivals
    Staykova, Kalina
    Damsgaard, Jan
    MIS QUARTERLY EXECUTIVE, 2021, 20 (04) : 275 - 295
  • [40] Regulating digital platforms: why, how, and why now
    Cass-Gottlieb, Gina
    JOURNAL OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT, 2023, 11 (03) : 307 - 314