Argumentation effect of a chatbot for ethical discussions about autonomous AI scenarios

被引:1
|
作者
Hauptmann, Christian [1 ]
Krenzer, Adrian [1 ]
Voelkel, Justin [2 ]
Puppe, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Lehrstuhl Lebensmittelchem, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Fac Law, Sanderring 2,, D-97070 Wurzburg, Bavaria, Germany
关键词
Argumentative dialogue system; Chatbot; User study; Argumentation effect; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10115-024-02074-x
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper explores the potential of a German-language chatbot to engage users in argumentative dialogues on ethically sensitive topics. Utilizing an argumentative knowledge graph, the chatbot is equipped to engage in discussions on the ethical implications of autonomous AI systems in hypothetical future scenarios in the fields of medicine, law, and self-driving cars. In a study with 178 student participants, we investigated the chatbot's argumentation effect-its ability to offer new perspectives, gain user acceptance, and broaden users' viewpoints on complex issues. The results indicated a substantial argumentation effect, with 13-21% of participants shifting their opinions to more moderate stances after interacting with the chatbot. This shift demonstrates the system's effectiveness in fostering informed discourse and increasing users' understanding of AI ethics. While the chatbot was well-received, with users acknowledging the quality of its arguments, we identified opportunities for improvement in its argument recognition capabilities. Despite this, our results indicate the chatbot's potential as an educational tool in engaging users with the ethical dimensions of AI technology and promoting informed discourse.
引用
收藏
页码:3607 / 3637
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does Information About AI Regulation Change Manager Evaluation of Ethical Concerns and Intent to Adopt AI?
    Cuellar, Mariano-Florentino
    Larsen, Benjamin
    Lee, Yong Suk
    Webb, Michael
    JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2024, 40 (01): : 34 - 75
  • [32] Is Society Ready for AI Ethical Decision Making? Lessons from a Study on Autonomous Cars
    Caro-Burnett, Johann
    Kaneko, Shinji
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 98
  • [33] Exploring the Effect of AI Assistance on Human Ethical Decisions
    Narayanan, Saumik
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, AIES 2023, 2023, : 939 - 940
  • [34] Can AI make people happy? The effect of AI-based chatbot on smile and speech in Parkinson's disease
    Ogawa, Mayuko
    Oyama, Genko
    Morito, Ken
    Kobayashi, Masatomo
    Yamada, Yasunori
    Shinkawa, Kaoru
    Kamo, Hikaru
    Hatano, Taku
    Hattori, Nobutaka
    PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2022, 99 : 43 - 46
  • [35] Big Sis South Africa: The AI-Powered Chatbot for Adolescent Girls to Learn About Sex and Relationships
    Ascroft, Elizabeth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEXUAL HEALTH, 2022, 34 : 216 - 216
  • [36] Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for development of standards in artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous robotic surgery
    O'Sullivan, Shane
    Nevejans, Nathalie
    Allen, Colin
    Blyth, Andrew
    Leonard, Simon
    Pagallo, Ugo
    Holzinger, Katharina
    Holzinger, Andreas
    Sajid, Mohammed Imran
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2019, 15 (01):
  • [38] Effect of AI chatbot empathy and identity disclosure on willingness to donate: the mediation of humanness and social presence
    Park, Gain
    Yim, Myungok Chris
    Chung, Jiyun
    Lee, Seyoung
    BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 42 (12) : 1998 - 2010
  • [39] It is not about autonomy: realigning the ethical debate on substitute judgement and AI preference predictors in healthcare
    Annoni, Marco
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2024,
  • [40] What About Justice and Power Imbalances? A Relational Approach to Ethical Risk Assessments for AI
    J. Krijger
    Digital Society, 2024, 3 (3):