A Hierarchical Game-Theoretic Decision-Making for Cooperative Multi-Agent Systems Under the Presence of Adversarial Agents

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Qin [1 ]
Parasuraman, Ramviyas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Comp Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Multi-Agent Systems; Game-Theoretic; Hierarchical Decomposition; Agent Needs; Cooperative; Adversaries;
D O I
10.1145/3555776.3577642
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Underlying relationships among Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) in hazardous scenarios can be represented as Game-theoretic models. This paper proposes a new hierarchical network-based model called Game-theoretic Utility Tree (GUT), which decomposes high-level strategies into executable low-level actions for cooperative MAS decisions. It combines with a new payoff measure based on agent needs for real-time strategy games. We present an Explore game domain, where we measure the performance of MAS achieving tasks from the perspective of balancing the success probability and system costs. We evaluate the GUT approach against state-of-the-art methods that greedily rely on rewards of the composite actions. Conclusive results on extensive numerical simulations indicate that GUT can organize more complex relationships among MAS cooperation, helping the group achieve challenging tasks with lower costs and higher winning rates. Furthermore, we demonstrated the applicability of the GUT using the simulator-hardware testbed - Robotarium. The performances verified the effectiveness of the GUT in the real robot application and validated that the GUT could effectively organize MAS cooperation strategies, helping the group with fewer advantages achieve higher performance.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 782
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prospect Theoretic Utility Based Human Decision Making in Multi-Agent Systems
    Geng, Baocheng
    Brahma, Swastik
    Wimalajeewa, Thakshila
    Varshney, Pramod K.
    Rangaswamy, Muralidhar
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2020, 68 (68) : 1091 - 1104
  • [42] Game-Theoretic Analysis of Adversarial Decision Making in a Complex Socio-Physical System
    Cullen, Andrew
    Alpcan, Tansu
    Kalloniatis, Alexander
    [J]. DYNAMIC GAMES AND APPLICATIONS, 2024,
  • [43] Learning Cooperative Behaviours in Adversarial Multi-agent Systems
    Wang, Ni
    Das, Gautham P.
    Millard, Alan G.
    [J]. TOWARDS AUTONOMOUS ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, TAROS 2022, 2022, 13546 : 179 - 189
  • [44] A hybrid approach to multi-agent decision-making
    Trigo, Paulo
    Coelho, Helder
    [J]. ECAI 2008, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 178 : 413 - +
  • [45] Fairness in Multi-Agent Sequential Decision-Making
    Zhang, Chongjie
    Shah, Julie A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 27 (NIPS 2014), 2014, 27
  • [46] Fast and Flexible Multi-Agent Decision-Making
    Leonard, Naomi Ehrich
    [J]. 2023 62ND IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, CDC, 2023, : 2 - 2
  • [47] A Game-Theoretic Incentive Mechanism for Multi-Distributor Multi-Agent Federated Learning
    Yang, Jian
    Zhu, Mingkai
    Zhou, Yan
    Zhang, Qingrui
    Ni, Yiyang
    [J]. 2024 IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE, WCNC 2024, 2024,
  • [48] Towards flexible multi-agent decision-making under time pressure
    Noh, S
    Gmytrasiewicz, PJ
    [J]. IJCAI-99: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOLS 1 & 2, 1999, : 492 - 498
  • [49] Cooperative game theoretic models for decision-making in contexts of library cooperation
    Hayes, RM
    [J]. LIBRARY TRENDS, 2003, 51 (03) : 441 - 461
  • [50] Game-Theoretic Lane Change Decision-Making Method Considering Traffic Trend
    Lu, Xinghao
    Zhao, Haiyan
    Li, Cheng
    Liu, Wan
    Gao, Bingzhao
    Zhou, Qiuzhan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2024, 71 (11) : 14793 - 14802