Pediatric Palliative Care: Insights into Assessment Tools and Review Instruments

被引:6
|
作者
Papa, Simonetta [1 ]
Mercante, Anna [2 ]
Giacomelli, Luca [1 ]
Benini, Franca [3 ]
机构
[1] Polistudium SRL, I-20121 Milan, Italy
[2] Osped San Bortolo, Child & Adolescent Neuropsychiat Unit, I-36100 Vicenza, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Pediat Palliat Care, Pain Serv, I-35122 Padua, Italy
来源
CHILDREN-BASEL | 2023年 / 10卷 / 08期
关键词
pediatric palliative care; assessment tools; quality of life; pain; symptoms; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GENERIC CORE SCALES; SURPRISE QUESTION; SELF-REPORT; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; CEREBRAL-PALSY; FATIGUE SCALE; CHILDREN; VALIDATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.3390/children10081406
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The proper assessment of needs and outcomes in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is imperative to ensure the best possible service to patients and families. However, given the multidimensional nature of PPC, the low number of patients in this setting, the heterogeneity of diseases, the presence of cognitive impairment in many patients, and the physiological development of children, outcomes can be complex and difficult to measure. Consequently, in this context, the use of standardized and validated tools to assess the needs of children and families, to assess symptom severity, and to estimate the quality of PPC service represent a current need. Even if efforts have been made to standardize approaches and tools for palliative care in adults, to our knowledge, a similar comprehensive assessment of PPC has not yet been conducted to date. This narrative review provides an overview and discusses the evaluation of tools currently applied in PPC, with an educational intent for healthcare providers. We found that several instruments are available to assess different dimensions of PPC. We proposed a classification into eligibility tools, patient and family needs assessment tools, and care assessment tools. At present, two main eligibility tools exist, the PaPaS Scale and the ACCAPED Scale questionnaire. Most of the tools for patient and family needs assessment have not been specifically validated in the PPC setting, and many may be more readily applied in research settings rather than in daily practice. Similar considerations can be made for tools assessing QoL, while tools assessing PPC service quality seem to be easily applied. Efforts to develop new specific tools and validate existing ones are undoubtedly advocated. However, in the patient's best interest, PPC healthcare providers should start using available tools, regardless of their validation status.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Scoping Review on Transitions in the Context of Pediatric Palliative Care
    Champagne, Elaine
    Chenard, Josee
    Simard, Chantale
    Bonanno, Marco
    Bogossian, Aline
    Roberge, Veronique
    Olivier-d'Avignon, Marianne
    Ummel, Deborah
    Fortin, Gabrielle
    Bergeron, Frederic
    Bonenfant, Frederique
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 27 (11) : 1541 - 1554
  • [32] Transition to Adulthood in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Narrative Review
    Benini, Franca
    Brogelli, Laura
    Mercante, Anna
    Giacomelli, Luca
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2024, 11 (07):
  • [33] The Role of Physiotherapy in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
    Ortiz-Campoy, Silvia
    Lirio-Romero, Cristina
    Romay-Barrero, Helena
    Alvarez, David Martin-Caro
    Lopez-Munoz, Purificacion
    Palomo-Carrion, Roclo
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2021, 8 (11):
  • [34] Impact of Specialized Pediatric Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
    Marcus, Katherine L.
    Santos, Gisella
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Comande, Daniel
    Bilodeau, Madeline
    Wolfe, Joanne
    Dussel, Veronica
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2020, 59 (02) : 339 - +
  • [35] Sedation in pediatric palliative care: The role of pediatric palliative care teams
    Cantero, Maria Jose Pelaez
    Asencio, Jose Miguel Morales
    Plantagenet-Whyte, Fatima Parra
    Carmona, Moises Leyva
    Antonelli, Mireille Rosique
    Bigata, Teresa Gili
    Alba, Ricardo Martino
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2024, 22 (04) : 644 - 648
  • [36] Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review
    Gutierrez Sanchez, Daniel
    Gomez Garcia, Rafael
    Maria Lopez-Medina, Isabel
    Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (04):
  • [37] The suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties
    Gutierrez-Sanchez, Daniel
    Gomez-Garcia, Rafael
    Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio, I
    Perez-Cruzado, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 110
  • [38] A systematic review of instruments related to family caregivers of palliative care patients
    Hudson, Peter L.
    Trauer, Tom
    Graham, Suzanne
    Grande, Gunn
    Ewing, Gail
    Payne, Sheila
    Stajduhar, Kelli I.
    Thomas, Kristina
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (07) : 656 - 668
  • [39] Palliative care screening tools and patient outcomes: a systematic review
    Zhang, Meiying
    Zhao, Yuxia
    Peng, Mengyun
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 14 (E2) : e1655 - e1662
  • [40] Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice
    Chan, Adrienne Y. L.
    Ge, Mengqin
    Harrop, Emily
    Johnson, Margaret
    Oulton, Kate
    Skene, Simon S.
    Wong, Ian C. K.
    Jamieson, Liz
    Howard, Richard F.
    Liossi, Christina
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 36 (01) : 30 - 43