Phenology-specific space use by Rio Grande wild turkeys

被引:4
|
作者
Moscicki, David J. [1 ,4 ]
White, Jacob H. [1 ]
Hardin, Jason B. [2 ]
Chamberlain, Michael J. [3 ]
Collier, Bret A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Renewable Nat Resources, Ctr Agr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Texas Parks & Wildlife Dept, Buffalo, TX 75831 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Biol Program, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2023年 / 87卷 / 02期
关键词
Meleagris gallopavo intermedia; movement ecology; reproductive phenology; Rio Grande wild turkey; Texas; HABITAT SELECTION; HOME RANGES; SURVIVAL; BEHAVIOR; ECOLOGY; HENS; MOVEMENTS; ELK;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.22331
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Conservation of wildlife populations necessitates identifying patterns in space use because fitness requirements influence resource selection; however, details on how phenology affects space use are often only cursorily addressed during development of space- and resource-use estimates. Moreover, space-use assessments often aggregate distinct, phenology-specific behaviors into generalized realizations of biological processes, such as reproduction. Therefore, to improve the relevance and accuracy of biological inferences for wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) space use at the population level, we defined 12 distinct phenology-specific periods to compare and contrast variations in space-use estimates. We calculated 1,568 individual space-use estimates using dynamic Brownian Bridge movement models for Rio Grande wild turkeys (M. g. intermedia; n = 255 females) across Texas, USA, during 2012-2018. Females in each pre-laying state used larger areas than during all other phenological states, suggestive of exploratory movements related to reproductive activities and resource acquisition. Incubation core areas were consistently <1.5 ha and incubation range sizes ranged from 10 ha to 48 ha. Core area and range sizes during the brooding period doubled from 15 days after hatch (3.1 ha and 42 ha) to 30 days after hatch (6.5 ha and 89 ha). Post-breeding and wintering period ranges were >30% smaller than reproductive period ranges. Mean daily distance traveled was similar across phenological states except during incubation and brooding periods. Our results indicate that examining wild turkey space use at identifiable, phenology-specific temporal scales will help mitigate against biases in estimates of resource selection based on arbitrary phenology definitions that aggregate data across multiple, distinct, phenological states.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sex-specific resource use by wild turkeys in response to hunting activity
    Roth, Alaina P.
    Wightman, Patrick H.
    Masto, Nicholas M.
    Cantrell, Jay R.
    Ruth, Charles
    Cohen, Bradley S.
    Chamberlain, Michael J.
    Collier, Bret A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 88 (04):
  • [32] Invertebrate abundance at Rio Grande wild turkey brood locations
    Randel, Charles J.
    Aguirre, Raymond
    Peterson, Markus J.
    Silvy, Nova J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 71 (07): : 2417 - 2420
  • [33] PHENOLOGY OF Copernicia prunifera (ARECACEAE) IN A CAATINGA AREA OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE
    Fernandes Rocha, Talita Geovanna
    Rodrigues Silva, Richeliel Albert
    Dantas, Eduarda Ximenes
    Vieira, Fabio de Almeida
    [J]. CERNE, 2015, 21 (04) : 673 - 681
  • [34] HOST PLANTS OF COTTON FLEAHOPPER IN RIO GRANDE VALLEY - PHENOLOGY AND HIBERNATING QUARTERS
    SCHUSTER, MF
    RICHMOND, CA
    BOLING, JC
    GRAHAM, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1969, 62 (05) : 1126 - &
  • [35] HOME RANGES OF FEMALE RIO GRANDE TURKEYS (MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO INTERMEDIA) IN SOUTHERN TEXAS
    Ramirez, Eric Reyes
    Clayton, Megan C.
    Lawson, Cody W.
    Burns, Stephen M.
    Guarneros-Altimirano, Rafael
    DeMaso, Stephen J.
    Kuvlesky, William P., Jr.
    Hewitt, David G.
    Ortega-Santos, J. Alfonso
    Campbell, Tyler A.
    [J]. SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST, 2012, 57 (02) : 198 - 201
  • [36] Space-use, movements, and survival of translocated eastern wild turkeys in east Texas
    Sullivan, Daniel J.
    Cohen, Bradley S.
    Poteet, Micah L.
    Collier, Bret A.
    Chamberlain, Michael J.
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2022, 46 (02):
  • [37] Raccoon abundance and Rio Grande wild turkey production in central Texas
    Schwertner, TW
    Peterson, MJ
    Slivy, NJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES, 2004, : 238 - 247
  • [38] Diseases of wild birds in southern Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
    Echenique, Joanna V. Z.
    Soares, Mauro P.
    Albano, Ana Paula N.
    Bandarra, Paulo M.
    Schild, Ana Lucia
    [J]. PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA, 2020, 40 (02): : 121 - 128
  • [39] From the Field: The relationship of Rio Grande wild turkey distributions to roads
    Butler, MJ
    Wallace, MC
    Ballard, WB
    DeMaso, SJ
    Applegate, RD
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2005, 33 (02): : 745 - 748
  • [40] Rio Grande wild turkey habitat selection in the southern great plains
    Hall, Galon I.
    Wallace, Mark C.
    Ballard, Warren B.
    Ruthven, Donald C., III
    Butler, Matthew J.
    Houchin, Rachael L.
    Huffman, Ross T.
    Phillips, Richard S.
    Applegate, Roger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 71 (08): : 2583 - 2591