Phenology-specific space use by Rio Grande wild turkeys

被引:4
|
作者
Moscicki, David J. [1 ,4 ]
White, Jacob H. [1 ]
Hardin, Jason B. [2 ]
Chamberlain, Michael J. [3 ]
Collier, Bret A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Renewable Nat Resources, Ctr Agr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Texas Parks & Wildlife Dept, Buffalo, TX 75831 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Biol Program, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2023年 / 87卷 / 02期
关键词
Meleagris gallopavo intermedia; movement ecology; reproductive phenology; Rio Grande wild turkey; Texas; HABITAT SELECTION; HOME RANGES; SURVIVAL; BEHAVIOR; ECOLOGY; HENS; MOVEMENTS; ELK;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.22331
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Conservation of wildlife populations necessitates identifying patterns in space use because fitness requirements influence resource selection; however, details on how phenology affects space use are often only cursorily addressed during development of space- and resource-use estimates. Moreover, space-use assessments often aggregate distinct, phenology-specific behaviors into generalized realizations of biological processes, such as reproduction. Therefore, to improve the relevance and accuracy of biological inferences for wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) space use at the population level, we defined 12 distinct phenology-specific periods to compare and contrast variations in space-use estimates. We calculated 1,568 individual space-use estimates using dynamic Brownian Bridge movement models for Rio Grande wild turkeys (M. g. intermedia; n = 255 females) across Texas, USA, during 2012-2018. Females in each pre-laying state used larger areas than during all other phenological states, suggestive of exploratory movements related to reproductive activities and resource acquisition. Incubation core areas were consistently <1.5 ha and incubation range sizes ranged from 10 ha to 48 ha. Core area and range sizes during the brooding period doubled from 15 days after hatch (3.1 ha and 42 ha) to 30 days after hatch (6.5 ha and 89 ha). Post-breeding and wintering period ranges were >30% smaller than reproductive period ranges. Mean daily distance traveled was similar across phenological states except during incubation and brooding periods. Our results indicate that examining wild turkey space use at identifiable, phenology-specific temporal scales will help mitigate against biases in estimates of resource selection based on arbitrary phenology definitions that aggregate data across multiple, distinct, phenological states.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NEST HABITAT USE OF RIO-GRANDE WILD TURKEYS
    SCHMUTZ, JA
    BRAUN, CE
    ANDELT, WF
    [J]. WILSON BULLETIN, 1989, 101 (04): : 591 - 598
  • [2] Brood-rearing habitat use by Rio Grande wild turkeys in Oregon
    Keegan, TW
    Crawford, JA
    [J]. GREAT BASIN NATURALIST, 1997, 57 (03): : 220 - 230
  • [3] REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE OF RIO-GRANDE WILD TURKEYS
    SCHMUTZ, JA
    BRAUN, CE
    [J]. CONDOR, 1989, 91 (03): : 675 - 680
  • [4] Survival of Rio Grande wild turkeys on the Edwards Plateau of Texas
    Collier, Bret A.
    Jones, Dustin A.
    Schaap, Jody N.
    Randel, Charles J., III
    Willsey, Beau J.
    Aguirre, Ray
    Schwertner, T. Wayne
    Silvy, Nova J.
    Peterson, Markus J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 71 (01): : 82 - 86
  • [5] Abnormal eggs of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys on the Edwards Plateau, Texas
    Melton, Kyle B.
    Dreilbelbis, Justin Z.
    Aguirre, Ray
    Collier, Bret A.
    Schwertner, T. Wayne
    Peterson, Markus J.
    Silvy, Nova J.
    [J]. WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2008, 120 (01): : 226 - 228
  • [6] Variation in brood sex ratios of Texas Rio Grande wild turkeys
    Collier, Bret A.
    Melton, Kyle B.
    Dreibelbis, Justin Z.
    Kuvlesky, William P.
    Proudfoot, Glenin A.
    Aguirre, Ray
    Hewitt, David G.
    Schwertner, T. W.
    Demaso, Stephen J.
    Silvy, Nova J.
    Peterson, Markus J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 71 (06): : 1793 - 1799
  • [7] Survival, harvest, and population size of Rio Grande wild turkeys in Texas
    Buckley, Byron R.
    Hardin, Jason B.
    Chamberlain, Michael J.
    Collier, Bret A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 86 (08):
  • [8] Evaluation of portable infrared cameras for detecting Rio Grande wild turkeys
    Locke, Shawn L.
    Lopez, Roel R.
    Peterson, Markus J.
    Silvy, Nova J.
    Schwertner, T. Wayne
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2006, 34 (03): : 839 - 844
  • [9] Instances of intraspecific nest parasitism in eastern and Rio Grande wild turkeys
    Sullivan, Daniel J.
    Wightman, Patrick H.
    Collier, Bret A.
    Chamberlain, Michael J.
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2022, 46 (02):
  • [10] RENESTING BY RIO-GRANDE WILD TURKEYS AFTER BROOD LOSS
    KEEGAN, TW
    CRAWFORD, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1993, 57 (04): : 801 - 804