Multistep estimators of the between-study covariance matrix under the multivariate random-effects model for meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Jackson, Dan [1 ]
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang [2 ]
van Aert, Robbie C. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] AstraZeneca, Stat Innovat, Cambridge, England
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Psychiat & Neuropsychol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Dept Methodol & Stat, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
heterogeneity; iterative methods; meta-regression; method of moments; multivariate statistical models; CLINICAL-TRIALS; VARIANCE; MOMENTS;
D O I
10.1002/sim.9985
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A wide variety of methods are available to estimate the between-study variance under the univariate random-effects model for meta-analysis. Some, but not all, of these estimators have been extended so that they can be used in the multivariate setting. We begin by extending the univariate generalised method of moments, which immediately provides a wider class of multivariate methods than was previously available. However, our main proposal is to use this new type of estimator to derive multivariate multistep estimators of the between-study covariance matrix. We then use the connection between the univariate multistep and Paule-Mandel estimators to motivate taking the limit, where the number of steps tends toward infinity. We illustrate our methodology using two contrasting examples and investigate its properties in a simulation study. We conclude that the proposed methodology is a fully viable alternative to existing estimation methods, is well suited to sensitivity analyses that explore the use of alternative estimators, and should be used instead of the existing DerSimonian and Laird-type moments based estimator in application areas where data are expected to be heterogeneous. However, multistep estimators do not seem to outperform the existing estimators when the data are more homogeneous. Advantages of the new multivariate multistep estimator include its semi-parametric nature and that it is computationally feasible in high dimensions. Our proposed estimation methods are also applicable for multivariate random-effects meta-regression, where study-level covariates are included in the model.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 773
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models
    Ades, AE
    Lu, G
    Higgins, JPT
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2005, 25 (06) : 646 - 654
  • [42] The choice of prior distribution for a covariance matrix in multivariate meta-analysis: a simulation study
    Rua, Sandra M. Hurtado
    Mazumdar, Madhu
    Strawderman, Robert L.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (30) : 4083 - 4104
  • [43] Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis
    Knapp, G
    Biggerstaff, BJ
    Hartung, J
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 48 (02) : 271 - 285
  • [44] A Comparison of Fixed-Effects and Random-Effects Models for Multivariate Meta-Analysis Using an SEM Approach
    Cai, Zhihui
    Fan, Xitao
    MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2020, 55 (06) : 839 - 854
  • [45] A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    Spiegelhalter, David J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2009, 172 : 137 - 159
  • [46] Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis
    Hall, SM
    Brannick, MT
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (02) : 377 - 389
  • [47] Allowing for correlations between correlations in random-effects meta-analysis of correlation matrices
    Prevost, A. Toby
    Mason, Dan
    Griffin, Simon
    Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
    Sutton, Stephen
    Spiegelhalter, David
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 12 (04) : 434 - 450
  • [48] Comments on 'Sequential methods for random-effects meta-analysis'
    Imberger, Georgina
    Gluud, Christian
    Wetterslev, Jorn
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (24) : 2965 - 2966
  • [49] Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters
    Guolo, Annamaria
    Varin, Cristiano
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (03) : 1500 - 1518
  • [50] metan: fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis
    Harris, Ross J.
    Bradburn, Michael J.
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Harbord, Roger M.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01): : 3 - 28