Hydrological models weighting for hydrological projections: The impacts on future peak flows

Reliable hydrological projections are of great importance for climate change impact studies, especially knowing that these analyses can allow identifying regional adaptation and mitigation strategies for the future. However, the literature has highlighted that hydrological models used under climate conditions that are contrasting to those used during their calibrations can lower their performance and reliability, an issue that lowers the confidence in hydrological projections and adds uncertainty to their analyses. More studies are needed to explore this issue and evaluate potential strategies that might improve hydrological models' reliability in climate change impact studies. Thus, the present study evaluates the robustness of hydrological models under contrasting climatic conditions and investigates the use of weighting techniques to improve their combined performance and reliability. The robustness of five lumped hydrological models is analysed using a Differential Split-Sample Testing (DSST) that evaluates their performance under cold, warm, humid and dry historical contrasting conditions over 77 basins covering different hydroclimatic conditions (two domains, one located in Quebec, Canada, and one in Mexico). Additionally, four basins were selected from the study area to evaluate the robustness of a more complex semi-distributed and more physically-based hydrological model and compare its simulations against the simpler lumped hydrological models. Based on the resulting performance of each hydrological model, five different weighting methods were applied to evaluate the potential improvements in the multi-model ensemble performance and quantify their effects on hydrological projections, particularly on future peak flows. For each basin, these streamflow projections were produced using two regional climate simulations (one per studied domain) issued from the Canadian Regional Climate Model version 5 (CRCM5) under the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 for the 1976-2005, 2041-2070 and 2070-2099 periods. The results showed that weighting hydrological models, even with the most simplistic methods, showed better performances over historical contrasting conditions than the best-performing lumped hydrological model. Between the different weighting methods, the Granger-Ramanathan type A showed the overall best performance among the different basins and climate conditions, particularly in peak streamflows. Over the CRCM5-driven peak flow projections, the weighting methods Granger-Ramanathan types A and B produced the largest impacts on the projected floods magnitudes and climate change signals. On the other hand, the additional tests using the semidistributed and more physically-based hydrological model revealed that this model showed more robust simulations than the weighted lumped hydrological models on low flows over the four selected basins. Additionally, more robust high-flow simulations were observed over a small snow-dominated basin, suggesting a potential added value in adding more complex hydrological models to simulate conditions under a changed climate.