Understanding carbon sequestration, allocation, and ecosystem storage in a grassed vineyard

被引:4
|
作者
Callesen, Torben Oliver [1 ]
Gonzalez, Carina Veronica [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Campos, Flavio Bastos [1 ]
Zanotelli, Damiano [1 ]
Tagliavini, Massimo [1 ]
Montagnani, Leonardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Agr Environm & Food Sci, Bolzano, Italy
[2] Inst Biol Agr Mendoza CONICET UNCUYO, Mendoza, Argentina
[3] UNCUYO, Fac Ciencias Agr, Mendoza, Argentina
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Vineyard ecosystem; Cover crops; Organic management; Eddy covariance; Carbon balance; Grapevine biomass; SOIL RESPIRATION; EDDY-COVARIANCE; COVER CROPS; NET PRIMARY; CO2; EFFLUX; LAND-USE; COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE VITICULTURE; LITTER DECOMPOSITION; MALUS-DOMESTICA;
D O I
10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00674
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Understanding if and to what extent agricultural land types can sequester carbon is important for assessing their greenhouse gas mitigation potential. Grassed vineyards have recently been described as large carbon sinks relative to most cropland types, indicating the importance of understanding their carbon cycle in more detail.To this end, we conducted a detailed study along a growing season in a grassed mountain vineyard with two varieties (Chardonnay and Sauvignon blanc) to quantify the overall carbon stock of the system and to attribute the carbon fluxes to the specific components of the carbon cycle of the agroecosystem, including vines organs (shoots, fruits, roots), grasses (shoots and roots) and soil. We combined eddy covariance, soil respiration, biometric measurements, and soil analysis.Our findings determined the studied vineyard to be a moderate carbon sink. We found a gross primary production (2409 & PLUSMN; 35 g C m-2) much larger than previous data for vineyards, but the net ecosystem production (246 & PLUSMN; 54 g C m-2) of the growing season was on the lower end of previous reports. The grassed alleys comprised roughly 60% of net primary production, confirming that they contribute significantly to the C input of the system. The overall carbon stored in the vineyard (152.1 & PLUSMN; 7.1 t C ha-1) was less than that of forests and some orchards primarily due to the lower amount of plant biomass. The soil represented by far the largest carbon storage in the vineyard, and changes in soil organic carbon and litter accounted for >75% of long-term carbon increase.Further studies are needed to unravel the relative contribution of the grapevines and grasses to overall gross primary productivity and soil carbon storage, especially in the context of different management decisions and the increasing frequency of drought events in similar mountain environments.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correction to: Quantifying and understanding carbon storage and sequestration within the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania, a tropical biodiversity hotspot
    Simon Willcock
    Oliver L. Phillips
    Philip J. Platts
    Andrew Balmford
    Neil D. Burgess
    Jon C. Lovett
    Antje Ahrends
    Julian Bayliss
    Nike Doggart
    Kathryn Doody
    Eibleis Fanning
    Jonathan M. H. Green
    Jaclyn Hall
    Kim L. Howell
    Rob Marchant
    Andrew R. Marshall
    Boniface Mbilinyi
    Pantaleon K. T. Munishi
    Nisha Owen
    Ruth D. Swetnam
    Elmer J. Topp-Jorgensen
    Simon L. Lewis
    Carbon Balance and Management, 12
  • [42] Biophysical risks to carbon sequestration and storage in Australian drylands
    Nolan, Rachael H.
    Sinclair, Jennifer
    Eldridge, David J.
    Ramp, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 208 : 102 - 111
  • [43] Carbon storage and sequestration by urban forests in Shenyang, China
    Liu, Changfu
    Li, Xiaoma
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2012, 11 (02) : 121 - 128
  • [44] Soil carbon storage capacity as a tool to prioritize areas for carbon sequestration
    Bhattacharyya, T.
    Chandran, D. K. Pal P.
    Ray, S. K.
    Mandal, C.
    Telpande, B.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2008, 95 (04): : 482 - 494
  • [45] Estate-Level Economics of Carbon Storage and Sequestration
    Karenlampi, Petri P.
    FORESTS, 2020, 11 (06):
  • [46] Aggregation of carbon dioxide sequestration storage assessment units
    Madalyn S. Blondes
    John H. Schuenemeyer
    Ricardo A. Olea
    Lawrence J. Drew
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2013, 27 : 1839 - 1859
  • [47] Forest Carbon Storage and Carbon Sequestration Potential in Shaanxi Province, China
    Li, Qi
    Xia, Xianli
    Kou, Xiaomei
    Niu, Le
    Wan, Fan
    Zhu, Jianhua
    Xiao, Wenfa
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (10):
  • [48] Aggregation of carbon dioxide sequestration storage assessment units
    Blondes, Madalyn S.
    Schuenemeyer, John H.
    Olea, Ricardo A.
    Drew, Lawrence J.
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2013, 27 (08) : 1839 - 1859
  • [49] Soil carbon storage capacity as a tool to prioritize areas for carbon sequestration
    National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Amravati Road, Nagpur 440 010, India
    Curr. Sci., 2008, 4 (482-494):
  • [50] ORGANIC CARBON STORAGE AND ITS ALLOCATION CHARACTERISTICS IN THE OIL TREE CAMELLIA OLEIFERA ECOSYSTEM IN LONGCHUAN, GUANGDONG, CHINA
    Cui, Zhiyi
    Deng, Xiaomei
    Xi, Ruchun
    Xu, Daping
    Li, Ruiping
    Hu, Jiaxin
    Zhu, Wen
    Xu, Yilin
    Jiao, Jinfeng
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2016, 25 (06): : 2166 - 2173