Costs of revision operations for distal junctional kyphosis following thoracic posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

被引:1
|
作者
Theologis, Alekos A. [1 ]
Wu, Hao-Hua [1 ]
Oeding, Jacob F. [2 ]
Diab, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco UCSF, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Floor 05,Room 5430,Box 3212, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Distal junctional kyphosis; Revision surgery; Risk factors; Direct costs; PEDICLE SCREW; SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; HYPERKYPHOSIS; APPEARANCE; VERTEBRA; FAILURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-024-08160-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To assess direct costs and risks associated with revision operations for distal junctional kyphosis/failure (DJK) following thoracic posterior spinal instrumented fusions (TPSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods Children who underwent TPSF for AIS by a single surgeon (2014-2020) were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were minimum follow-up of 2 years, thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusion with a lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) cranial to L2. Patients who developed DJK requiring revision operations were identified and compared with those who did not develop DJK. Results Seventy-nine children were included for analysis. Of these, 6.3% developed DJK. Average time to revision was 20.8 +/- 16.2 months. Comparing index operations, children who developed DJK had significantly greater BMIs, significantly lower thoracic kyphosis postoperatively, greater post-operative lumbar Cobb angles, and significantly more LIVs cranial to the sagittal stable vertebrae (SSV), despite having statistically similar pre-operative coronal and sagittal alignment parameters and operative details compared with non-DJK patients. Revision operations for DJK, when compared with index operations, involved significantly fewer levels, longer operative times, greater blood loss, and longer hospital lengths of stay. These factors resulted in significantly greater direct costs for revision operations for DJK ($76,883 v. $46,595; p < 0.01). Conclusions In this single-center experience, risk factors for development of DJK were greater BMI, lower post-operative thoracic kyphosis, and LIV cranial to SSV. As revision operations for DJK were significantly more costly than index operations, all efforts should be aimed at strategies to prevent DJK in the AIS population.
引用
收藏
页码:2504 / 2511
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predictors of cost for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Baky, Fady J.
    Echternacht, Scott R.
    Milbrandt, Todd A.
    Kremers, Hilal Maradit
    Ransom, Jeanine
    Stans, Anthony A.
    Shaughnessy, William J.
    Larson, A. Noelle
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2020, 8 (03) : 421 - 426
  • [32] Predictors of cost for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Fady J. Baky
    Scott R. Echternacht
    Todd A. Milbrandt
    Hilal Maradit Kremers
    Jeanine Ransom
    Anthony A. Stans
    William J. Shaughnessy
    A. Noelle Larson
    Spine Deformity, 2020, 8 : 421 - 426
  • [33] Drug eruptions in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Uehara, Masashi
    Ikegami, Shota
    Kuraishi, Shugo
    Oba, Hiroki
    Takizawa, Takashi
    Munakata, Ryo
    Hatakenaka, Terue
    Mimura, Tetsuhiko
    Takahashi, Jun
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30
  • [34] Pancreatitis after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Farley, FA
    Caird, MS
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2001, 14 (03): : 268 - 270
  • [35] Posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis
    Roberts, S. B.
    Tsirikos, A. I.
    Subramanian, A. S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B (08): : 1082 - 1089
  • [36] Rod Angulation Relationship with Thoracic Kyphosis after Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Posterior Instrumentation
    Boissiere, Louis
    Bourghli, Anouar
    Guevara-Villazon, Fernando
    Pellise, Ferran
    Alanay, Ahmet
    Kleinstueck, Frank
    Pizones, Javier
    Roscop, Cecile
    Larrieu, Daniel
    Obeid, Ibrahim
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [37] Risk factor analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis
    Wang, Jingjie
    Zhao, Yongfei
    Shen, Binghua
    Wang, Chuanfeng
    Li, Ming
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2010, 41 (04): : 415 - 420
  • [38] Posterior Spinal Fusion Versus Anterior/Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Decision Analysis
    Davis, Matthew A.
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (21) : 2318 - 2323
  • [39] Thoracic posterior spinal instrumented fusion vs. thoracic anterior spinal tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a minimum of 2-year follow-up: a cost comparison of index and revision operations
    Alekos A. Theologis
    Hao-Hua Wu
    Mohammad Diab
    Spine Deformity, 2023, 11 : 359 - 366
  • [40] What happens to the unfused upper thoracic curve after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
    Iqbal, M. Omar
    Samdani, Amer F.
    Pahys, Joshua M.
    Newton, Peter O.
    Shah, Suken A.
    Bastrom, Tracey P.
    Sponseller, Paul D.
    Miyanji, Firoz
    Hwang, Steven W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2021, 27 (06) : 725 - 731