Rural-Urban Differences in Hospital and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:2
|
作者
Lachance, Andrew D. [1 ,6 ]
Call, Catherine [2 ]
Radford, Zachary [3 ]
Stoddard, Henry [4 ]
Sturgeon, Callahan [4 ]
Babikian, George [4 ]
Rana, Adam [4 ,5 ]
Mcgrory, Brian J. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Guthrie Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sayre, PA USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Yale Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Maine Med Ctr, MaineHlth Inst Res, Portland, ME USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Maine Med Ctr, Portland, ME USA
[6] Robert Packer Hosp, 1 Guthrie Sq, Sayre, PA 18840 USA
来源
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY | 2023年 / 23卷
关键词
Arthroplasty; Rural; Urban; Patient-reported outcomes; THA; HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010; UNITED-STATES; KNEE; DISPARITIES; CARE; SATISFACTION; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2023.101190
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Rural patients have unique health-care factors influencing outcomes of arthroplasty, hypothetically putting these patients at increased risk for complications following total joint arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to better understand differences in patient outcomes and satisfaction between rural and urban patients receiving care in an urban setting and to provide more equitable care.Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty at a single large academic center between January 2013 and August 2020. Demographic, operative, and hospital outcomes were obtained from the institutional electronic medical record. Rurality was determined by rural-urban code (RUC) classifications by zip code with RUC codes 1-3 defined as urban and RUC 4-10 defined as rural.Results: Patients from urban areas were more likely to visit the emergency department within 30 days postoperatively (P = .006) and be readmitted within 90 days (P < .001). However, unplanned (P < .001) admissions were higher in the rural group. There was no statistical difference in postoperative com-plications (P = .4). At 6 months, rural patients had higher patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score total (P = .05), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score interval (P = .05), self-reported functional improvement (P < .05), improvements in pain (P < .05), and that the surgery met expectations (P < .05). However, these values did not reach minimal clinically important difference.Conclusions: There may be differences in emergency department visits, readmissions, and PROMs in rural vs urban populations undergoing total hip arthroplasty in an urban setting. Patient access to care and attitudes of rural patients toward health care may underlie these findings. Understanding differences in PROMs, satisfaction, and hospital-based outcomes based on rurality is essential to provide equitable arthroplasty care.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-reported outcomes in total hip arthroplasty for patients with anatomically contoured femoral heads
    Lim, Perry L.
    Freiberg, Andrew A.
    Melnic, Christopher M.
    Bedair, Hany S.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 34 (06) : 748 - 753
  • [32] UNDERLYING DIAGNOSIS PREDICTS PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AFTER REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY
    Singh, J. A.
    Lewallen, D.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2013, 72 : 553 - 553
  • [33] Operative diagnosis for revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    Lewallen, David G.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
  • [34] COMORBIDITES AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY
    Loth, F. L.
    Giesinger, J. M.
    Giesinger, K.
    Howie, C.
    Hamilton, D. F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A544 - A544
  • [35] Patient-Reported Outcomes After Revision of Metal-on-Metal Total Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Mata-Fink, Ana
    Philipson, Daniel J.
    Keeney, Benjamin J.
    Ramkumar, Dipak B.
    Moschetti, Wayne E.
    Tomek, Ivan M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (04): : 1241 - 1244
  • [36] Tool for Patient Selection to Optimize Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.
    Hawker, Gillian A.
    Croxford, Ruth
    Davis, A. M.
    Dunn, Sheila
    Elkayam, Joy G.
    French, Melissa R.
    Gignac, M. A.
    Jaglal, Susan B.
    Sale, Joanna
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (10): : S980 - S980
  • [37] Are Patient-Reported Drug Allergies Associated With Prosthetic Joint Infections and Functional Outcomes Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?
    Fisher, Nina D.
    Bi, Andrew S.
    Singh, Vivek
    Sicat, Chelsea Sue
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    Aggarwal, Vinay K.
    Rozell, Joshua C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (01): : 26 - 30
  • [38] Reply to Letter to the Editor on "Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Comparison Based on Surgical Approaches"
    Finch, Daniel J.
    Martin, Brook I.
    Franklin, Patricia D.
    Magder, Laurence S.
    Pellegrini, Vincent D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (09): : 2687 - 2688
  • [39] No clinically significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures across total hip arthroplasty approaches
    Kim, Andrew G.
    Rizk, Adam A.
    Chiu, Austin M.
    Zuke, William
    Acuna, Alexander J.
    Kamath, Atul F.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 34 (01) : 21 - 32
  • [40] Influence of increased pain sensitivity on patient-reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty
    Kim, Man Soo
    Koh, In Jun
    Sung, Yong Gyu
    Park, Dong Chul
    Yoon, Eun Ji
    In, Yong
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (03) : 782 - 790