From Technological Sustainability to Social Sustainability: An Analysis of Hotspots and Trends in Residential Design Evaluation

被引:1
|
作者
Song, Meijiao [1 ]
Cai, Jun [1 ]
Xue, Yisi [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Art & Design, Guangzhou 510075, Peoples R China
关键词
residential buildings; design evaluation; bibliometrics; technological sustainability; social sustainability; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; OPTIMIZATION; BUILDINGS; SYSTEM; PARTICIPATION; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.3390/su151310088
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Residential design should not only meet the growing demand for habitation but also reduce the negative impact on the natural environment. Therefore, the sustainability of residential buildings has become increasingly important in residential design evaluation. Taking the core database of the Web of Science platform as its source of information, this paper uses bibliometrics to visually analyze the current research status of residential design evaluation and its development trends, as well as hotspots of research from the perspectives of the annual distribution of publications, research fields and institutions, keywords, and highly cited articles. The results demonstrate the following: the number of publications on residential design evaluation has shown an overall upward trend and has grown rapidly over the past five years. Furthermore, due to the emergence of social issues, such as the aging population, social polarization, and rising urban poverty levels, scholars in the field have attached importance to the comprehensive evaluation of residential senior-friendliness, fairness, health, and quality, thereby expanding the connotation of residential sustainability from the technological dimension toward the social dimension. This paper can help researchers to identify future research directions in this field.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Social Sustainability in Design: Moving the Discussions Forward
    McMahon, Muireann
    Bhamra, Tracy
    DESIGN JOURNAL, 2015, 18 (03): : 367 - 391
  • [42] Social packaging. Design for wide sustainability
    Bozzola, Marco
    De Giorgi, Claudia
    DESIGN JOURNAL, 2019, 22 : 737 - 749
  • [43] A design studio experience: impacts of social sustainability
    Ceylan, Salih
    Soygenis, Murat Deniz
    ARCHNET-IJAR INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (02) : 368 - 385
  • [44] EDUCATION IN DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABILITY AND NEW SOCIAL CHANGES
    Aparo, Ermanno
    Soares, Liliana
    Rivas, Manuel
    Teixeira, Jorge
    Cavaleiro, Rui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION, E&PDE 2023, 2023, 123 : 1 - 6
  • [45] Assessment of social sustainability: A comparative analysis
    Abed A.R.
    Abed, Amal R. (a_abed@asu.edu.jo), 1600, ICE Publishing (170): : 72 - 82
  • [46] Perspectives on sustainability certification and design process - From evaluation tool to design tool
    Brunsgaard, Camilla
    Larsen, Tine S.
    INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (07) : 869 - 872
  • [47] Defining the social dimension of sustainability in product design
    Watkins, M. (matthew.watkins@ntu.ac.uk), 1600, Trans Tech Publications Ltd (572):
  • [48] Corporate social responsibility: a sustainability analysis
    Jhancarlos, Gutierrez-Ayala
    INQUIETUD EMPRESARIAL, 2022, 22 (02): : I - IV
  • [49] Urban Social Sustainability: A Concept Analysis
    Mirkov, Andelka
    SOCIOLOGIJA, 2012, 54 (01) : 55 - 70
  • [50] Social sustainability in agriculture: a media analysis
    Janker, Judith
    Fuchs, Kathrin
    Krutli, Pius
    AGRARFORSCHUNG SCHWEIZ, 2019, 10 (7-8): : 282 - 289