ECMO Retrieval Program: What Have We Learned So Far

被引:2
|
作者
Krasivskyi, Ihor [1 ]
Grossmann, Clara [1 ]
Dechow, Marit [1 ]
Djordjevic, Ilija [1 ]
Ivanov, Borko [2 ]
Gerfer, Stephen [1 ]
Bennour, Walid [1 ]
Kuhn, Elmar [1 ]
Sabashnikov, Anton [1 ]
Mader, Navid [1 ]
Eghbalzadeh, Kaveh [1 ]
Wahlers, Thorsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[2] Helios Hosp Siegburg, Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, D-53721 Siegburg, Germany
来源
LIFE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
ECMO; cardiogenic shock; mortality; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; OUTCOMES; SUPPORT; ADULTS;
D O I
10.3390/life13010157
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used for patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. However, survival rates remain low. It is unclear to what extent ECMO patients benefit from the ECMO team learning curve. Therefore, we aimed to analyze our mobile ECMO program patients from the past seven years to evaluate if a learning curve benefits patients' outcomes. We analyzed 111 patients from our databank who were supported with a VA-ECMO and brought to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: survival (n = 70) and non-survival (n = 41). As expected, complications after ECMO implantation were more severe in the non-survivor group. The incidence of thromboembolic events (p = 0.002), hepatic failure (p < 0.001), renal failure (p = 0.002), dialysis (p = 0.002) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS, p = 0.044) occurred significantly more often compared with the survivor group. We were able to show that despite our extensive experience in terms of ECMO retrieval program the high mortality and morbidity rates stay fairly the same over the years. This displays that we have to focus even more on patient selection and ECMO indication.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] So what have we learned?
    Elston, H. J.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL HEALTH & SAFETY, 2010, 17 (01): : 3 - 3
  • [42] Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: What have we learned so far?
    Ruel, Marie T.
    Quisumbing, Agnes R.
    Balagamwala, Mysbah
    GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 17 : 128 - 153
  • [43] Circadian Clocks in Fish-What Have We Learned so far?
    Steindal, Inga A. Froland
    Whitmore, David
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2019, 8 (01):
  • [44] Central serous chorioretinopathy and the sclera: what we have learned so far
    Koizumi, Hideki
    Imanaga, Naoya
    Terao, Nobuhiro
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 68 (05) : 419 - 428
  • [45] Classifying Information Systems Risks: What Have We Learned So Far?
    Wiesche, Manuel
    Keskinov, Hristo
    Schermann, Michael
    Krcmar, Helmut
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 46TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, : 5013 - 5022
  • [46] Sex Hormones and Colorectal Cancer: What Have We Learned So Far?
    Lin, Jennifer H.
    Giovannucci, Edward
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (23): : 1746 - 1747
  • [47] THE NICE QALY SEVERITY MODIFIER: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED SO FAR
    Hailwood, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (12)
  • [48] Human Brown Adipose Tissue: What We Have Learned So Far
    Betz, Matthias J.
    Enerback, Sven
    DIABETES, 2015, 64 (07) : 2352 - 2360
  • [49] Sarcopenia in chronic kidney disease: what have we learned so far?
    Sabatino, Alice
    Cuppari, Lilian
    Stenvinkel, Peter
    Lindholm, Bengt
    Avesani, Carla Maria
    JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 34 (04) : 1347 - 1372
  • [50] Six Years of Criticality Assessments: What Have We Learned So Far?
    Graedel, T. E.
    Reck, Barbara K.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 20 (04) : 692 - 699