Digitalization and firms' innovation efficiency: Do corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility matter?
被引:8
|
作者:
Zhong, Xi
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Management, 161 Yinglong Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R ChinaGuangdong Univ Technol, Sch Management, 161 Yinglong Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Zhong, Xi
[1
]
Ren, Ge
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
South China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, 381 Wushan Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R ChinaGuangdong Univ Technol, Sch Management, 161 Yinglong Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Ren, Ge
[2
]
机构:
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Management, 161 Yinglong Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, 381 Wushan Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Digitalization;
Innovation efficiency;
Corporate social responsibility;
Corporate social irresponsibility;
Absorptive capacity;
D24;
L25;
M11;
TECHNOLOGIES;
PERFORMANCE;
IMPACT;
RISK;
D O I:
10.1007/s10961-024-10075-9
中图分类号:
T [工业技术];
学科分类号:
08 ;
摘要:
High innovation efficiency is regarded as an important starting point for enhancing the competitive advantage of enterprises and encouraging them to achieve sustainable development. However, to date, how digitalization affects firms' innovation efficiency is still unclear. We integrate absorptive capacity and stakeholder theory to argue that in the short term, digitalization undermines firms' absorptive capacity, thereby reducing their innovation efficiency. Second, we propose that corporate social responsibility (CSR) (including internal and external CSR) weakens the negative impact of digitalization on firms' innovation efficiency by mitigating its destructive effect on their absorptive capacity. In contrast, corporate social irresponsibility (CSiR) (including internal and external CSiR) enhances the negative impact of digitalization on firms' innovation efficiency by increasing the destructive effect of digitalization on their absorptive capacity. Finally, we argue that internal CSR plays a stronger buffering role than does external CSR. In contrast, internal CSiR plays a stronger enhancing role than does external CSiR. Based on the fixed effects model, we obtain empirical evidence to support most of our theoretical views from our empirical tests of 212 Chinese pharmaceutical listed companies. This research brings new insights into a more nuanced understanding of the impact of digitalization on firms' innovation.
机构:
Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Shannxi, Peoples R ChinaXi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Shannxi, Peoples R China
Zhang, Zhe
Gong, Mijia
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Shannxi, Peoples R ChinaXi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Shannxi, Peoples R China
Gong, Mijia
Zhang, Shanshan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Shannxi, Peoples R ChinaXi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Shannxi, Peoples R China
Zhang, Shanshan
Jia, Ming
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Management, Xian, Peoples R ChinaXi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Shannxi, Peoples R China