Collaborative encoding with a new categorization task: a contribution to collaborative memory research

被引:0
|
作者
Conte, Nadia [1 ]
Pelegrina, Santiago [2 ]
Padulo, Caterina [3 ]
Marascia, Erika [1 ]
Fairfield, Beth [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Psychol Hlth & Terr Sci, I-66100 Chieti, Italy
[2] Univ Jaen, Dept Psychol, Jaen 23071, Spain
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Humanities, Naples I-80133, Italy
来源
关键词
DIVIDED ATTENTION; FALSE MEMORIES; RETRIEVAL-PROCESSES; SOCIAL CONTAGION; OLDER-ADULTS; INDIVIDUAL RECALL; AFFECTIVE NORMS; INHIBITION; ADAPTATION; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00426-024-01929-w
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Collaborative memory research has focused primarily on the effects of collaboration at recall with collaboration during encoding receiving less attention. In the present study, collaboration was investigated both at encoding and at retrieval to determine its effects and possible interactions. The aim was to clarify whether the collaborative inhibition effect depended on whether the encoding was with the same or with a different partner. A total of 320 participants (160 Italian and 160 Spanish undergraduate students) were administered a modified version of the collaborative memory paradigm with a new categorization task of verbal affective stimuli at encoding. Specifically, they were asked to classify 90 printed words into 6 categories, so as to have 15 words in each category and then did two recall tasks. Participants were assigned to one of five possible conditions according to encoding (collaborative, individual) and recall (collaborative with the same partner, with another partner, and individual). Results show a collaborative encoding deficit and the classic collaborative inhibition effect independently of whether the encoding was collaborative or individual and even in a collaborative recall group that showed a degree of recall output organization comparable to that of the individual recall group. These results are not wholly consistent with a retrieval disruption explanation and are discussed according to divided attention during collaborative recall and how it may contribute to the collaborative inhibition effect.
引用
收藏
页码:1339 / 1351
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Collaborative research
    Fetzer, J
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 376 (03) : 279 - 280
  • [32] Collaborative Research
    Kuehn, Bridget M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (12): : 1198 - 1198
  • [33] COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH
    SNOW, JB
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1982, 108 (10) : 644 - 646
  • [34] COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH
    MAYBERRY, W
    GILLIGAN, MB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1985, 39 (01): : 52 - 53
  • [35] Collaborative research
    Rekrut, MD
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 1997, 41 (01) : 26 - 34
  • [36] COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH
    HERSHMAN, A
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 1989, 85 (07) : 6 - 6
  • [37] Collaborative memory: Managing knowledge in collaborative commerce context
    Li, Jing
    Liu, Songbai
    Li, Jiangyu
    Sixth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Vols 1-4: MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN A GLOBAL WORLD, 2007, : 1442 - 1447
  • [38] Collaborative Research
    不详
    PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2012, 113 (01) : 22 - 22
  • [39] Collaborative research
    John Fetzer
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2003, 376 : 279 - 280
  • [40] Memory Accuracy and Errors: the Effects of Collaborative Encoding on Long-Term Retention
    Rebecca Brooke Bays
    Mary Ann Foley
    Stephanie Madlener
    Catherine Haorei
    Current Psychology, 2019, 38 : 1335 - 1346