Gestational diabetes mellitus screening and diagnosis criteria before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective pre-post study

被引:3
|
作者
Meloncelli, Nina J. L. [1 ]
Barnett, Adrian G. [2 ,3 ]
Cameron, Cate M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Mcintyre, David [5 ]
Callaway, Leonie K. [6 ]
d'Emden, Michael C. [6 ]
de Jersey, Susan J. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Australian Ctr Hlth Serv Innovat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Ctr Healthcare Transformat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Jamieson Trauma Inst, Metro North Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Mater Res Inst, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
[6] Metro North Hlth, Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Diabetes; gestational; COVID-19; Diagnostic tests and procedures; PREGNANCY; HYPERGLYCEMIA; OUTCOMES; RISK;
D O I
10.5694/mja2.52129
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective:To determine whether perinatal outcomes after excluding gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on the basis of fasting venous plasma glucose (FVPG) assessment during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020 were similar to those during the preceding year after excluding GDM using the standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) procedure. Design:Retrospective pre-post study. Setting, participants:All women who gave birth in Queensland during 1 July - 31 December 2019 and 1 July - 31 December 2020. Main outcome measures:Perinatal (maternal and neonatal) outcomes for pregnant women assessed for GDM, by assessment method (2019: OGTT/glycated haemoglobin [HbA(1c)] assessment; 2020: GDM could be excluded by an FVPG value below 4.7 mmol/L). Results:3968 of 29 113 pregnant women in Queensland during 1 July - 31 December 2019 (13.6%) were diagnosed with GDM, and 4029 of 28 778 during 1 July - 31 December 2020 (14.0%). In 2020, FVPG assessments established GDM in 216 women (1.1%) and excluded it in 1660 (5.8%). The frequencies of most perinatal outcomes were similar for women without GDM in 2019 and those for whom it was excluded in 2020 on the basis of FVPG values; the exception was caesarean delivery, for which the estimated probability increase in 2020 was 3.9 percentage points (95% credibility interval, 2.2-5.6 percentage points), corresponding to an extra 6.5 caesarean deliveries per 1000 births. The probabilities of several outcomes - respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care or special nursery admission, large for gestational age babies - were about one percentage point higher for women without GDM in 2020 (excluding those diagnosed on the basis of FVPG assessment alone) than for women without GDM in 2019. Conclusions:Identifying women at low absolute risk of gestational diabetes-related pregnancy complications on the basis of FVPG assessment as an initial step in GDM screening could reduce the burden for pregnant women and save the health system substantial costs.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 474
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gestational diabetes mellitus screening and diagnosis criteria before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective pre-post study
    de Jersey, Susan J.
    d'Emden, Michael C.
    Barnett, Adrian G.
    McIntyre, H. David
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2024, 220 (07) : 387 - 387
  • [2] Comparing the screening methods for gestational diabetes mellitus before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review
    Sun, Xingge
    Mckeaveney, Clare
    Noble, Helen
    O'Hara, Hannah
    Perra, Oliver
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2024, 15 (04) : 500 - 516
  • [3] Effects of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective study
    Ghesquiere, L.
    Garabedian, C.
    Drumez, E.
    Lemaitre, M.
    Cazaubiel, M.
    Bengler, C.
    Vambergue, A.
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2021, 47 (02)
  • [4] A pre-post study of stressors and burnout affecting breast radiologists before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Parikh, Jay R.
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Mainiero, Martha B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2023, 11
  • [5] RESUMING ADEQUATE SCREENING FOR GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS DURING THE ONGOING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
    Panaitescu, A. M.
    [J]. ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA-BUCHAREST, 2021, 17 (02) : 278 - 279
  • [6] Gestational diabetes mellitus and COVID-19: The epidemic during the pandemic
    Mendez, Yamely
    Radilla, Linda A. Alpuing
    Delgadillo Chabolla, Luis Eduardo
    Cruz, Alejandra Castillo
    Luna, Johanan
    Surani, Salim
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2023, 14 (08) : 1178 - 1193
  • [7] Comparative study of the alternative Gestational Diabetes Mellitus screening strategy utilized during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Albakri, Omar
    Coolen, Jillian
    Matheson, Kara
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S211 - S212
  • [8] Fasting Glucose for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Gonzalez Gonzalez, Nieves Luisa
    Gonzalez Davila, Enrique
    Bugatto, Fernando
    Vega-Guedes, Begona
    Pintado, Pilar
    Tascon, L.
    Villalba Martin, Nazaret
    Plasencia, Walter
    Megia, Ana
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [9] Gestational diabetes mellitus in the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study from Hangzhou, China
    Yin, Binbin
    Wu, Kaiqi
    Hu, Lingwei
    Zheng, Wanlu
    Zheng, Yidan
    Duan, Xiuzhi
    Zhu, Bo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2022, 14 (10) : 711 - 720
  • [10] The Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    McIntyre, H. David
    Moses, Robert G.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2020, 43 (07) : 1433 - 1434