Sensitivity analyses for the principal ignorability assumption using multiple imputation

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Craig [1 ]
Zhang, Yufen [2 ]
Mealli, Fabrizia [3 ,4 ]
Bornkamp, Bjorn [1 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharma AG, Dept Analyt, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Novartis Pharmaceut, Dept Analyt, E Hanover, NJ USA
[3] Univ Florence, Florence Ctr Data Sci, Dept Stat Comp Sci & Applicat, Florence, Italy
[4] European Univ Inst, Econ Dept, Florence, Italy
关键词
causal inference; estimand; principal stratum; subgroup analysis; survival analysis;
D O I
10.1002/pst.2260
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
In the context of clinical trials, there is interest in the treatment effect for subpopulations of patients defined by intercurrent events, namely disease-related events occurring after treatment initiation that affect either the interpretation or the existence of endpoints. With the principal stratum strategy, the ICH E9(R1) guideline introduces a formal framework in drug development for defining treatment effects in such subpopulations. Statistical estimation of the treatment effect can be performed based on the principal ignorability assumption using multiple imputation approaches. Principal ignorability is a conditional independence assumption that cannot be directly verified; therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the robustness of results to deviations from this assumption. As a sensitivity analysis, we propose a joint model that multiply imputes the principal stratum membership and the outcome variable while allowing different levels of violation of the principal ignorability assumption. We illustrate with a simulation study that the joint imputation model-based approaches are superior to naive subpopulation analyses. Motivated by an oncology clinical trial, we implement the sensitivity analysis on a time-to-event outcome to assess the treatment effect in the subpopulation of patients who discontinued due to adverse events using a synthetic dataset. Finally, we explore the potential usage and provide interpretation of such analyses in clinical settings, as well as possible extension of such models in more general cases.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 78
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analyses of Sensitivity to the Missing-at-Random Assumption Using Multiple Imputation With Delta Adjustment: Application to a Tuberculosis/HIV Prevalence Survey With Incomplete HIV-Status Data
    Leacy, Finbarr P.
    Floyd, Sian
    Yates, Tom A.
    White, Ian R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 185 (04) : 304 - 315
  • [2] Multiple imputation in principal component analysis
    Julie Josse
    Jérôme Pagès
    François Husson
    [J]. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 2011, 5 : 231 - 246
  • [3] Multiple imputation in principal component analysis
    Josse, Julie
    Pages, Jerome
    Husson, Francois
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DATA ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION, 2011, 5 (03) : 231 - 246
  • [4] Sensitivity analyses of unmeasured and partially-measured confounders using multiple imputation in a vaccine safety study
    Xu, Stanley
    Clarke, Christina L.
    Newcomer, Sophia R.
    Daley, Matthew F.
    Glanz, Jason M.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 30 (09) : 1200 - 1213
  • [5] Multiple imputation for continuous variables using a Bayesian principal component analysis
    Audigier, Vincent
    Husson, Francois
    Josse, Julie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2016, 86 (11) : 2140 - 2156
  • [6] Using Generalized Procrustes Analysis for Multiple Imputation in Principal Component Analysis
    Joost R. van Ginkel
    Pieter M. Kroonenberg
    [J]. Journal of Classification, 2014, 31 : 242 - 269
  • [7] Using Generalized Procrustes Analysis for Multiple Imputation in Principal Component Analysis
    van Ginkel, Joost R.
    Kroonenberg, Pieter M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 2014, 31 (02) : 242 - 269
  • [8] Relaxing the independent censoring assumption in the Cox proportional hazards model using multiple imputation
    Jackson, Dan
    White, Ian R.
    Seaman, Shaun
    Evans, Hannah
    Baisley, Kathy
    Carpenter, James
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (27) : 4681 - 4694
  • [9] Sensitivity analysis for principal ignorability violation in estimating complier and noncomplier average causal effects
    Nguyen, Trang Quynh
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    Scharfstein, Daniel O.
    Ogburn, Elizabeth L.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (19) : 3664 - 3688
  • [10] Guided multiple imputation of missing data - Using a subsample to strengthen the missing-at-random assumption
    Fraser, Gary
    Ru Yan
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 18 (02) : 246 - 252