Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone versus trichlormethiazide in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: EXCITE-HT study

被引:4
|
作者
Kario, Kazuomi [1 ,8 ]
Ohishi, Mitsuru [2 ]
Katsuya, Tomohiro [3 ,4 ]
Taguchi, Takashi [5 ]
Tanabe, Ayumi [6 ]
Sugimoto, Kotaro [5 ]
Shimosawa, Tatsuo [7 ]
机构
[1] Jichi Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
[2] Kagoshima Univ, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, Dept Cardiovasc Med & Hypertens, Shimotsuke, Kagoshima, Japan
[3] Katsuya Clin, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
[4] Osaka Univ, Dept Clin Gene Therapy, Grad Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
[5] Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd, Primary Med Sci Dept, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd, Data Intelligence Dept, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Sch Med, Dept Clin Lab, Chiba, Japan
[8] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Sch Med, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 3290498, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION | 2023年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
esaxerenone; hypertension; mineralocorticoid receptor blockers; randomized comparative study; trichlormethiazide; HOME BLOOD-PRESSURE; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS; THIAZIDE DIURETICS; OUTCOME INCIDENCE; CS-3150; EPLERENONE; PHASE-3; STROKE;
D O I
10.1111/jch.14705
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
The next-generation mineralocorticoid receptor blocker (MRB) esaxerenone has favorable antihypertensive effects in patients who do not respond to treatment with first-line antihypertensive agents and may be beneficial as a second-line treatment. However, MRBs are currently considered a fourth-line treatment as there is no clinical evidence comparing the efficacy of esaxerenone with other classes of antihypertensive agents. The multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group EXCITE-HT study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone as a second-line agent in the treatment of Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. After a 4-week run-in period, patients will receive either esaxerenone or trichlormethiazide for 12 weeks per the package insert and the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. At Weeks 4 and 8, the dose of esaxerenone or trichlormethiazide may be increased. Blood pressure (home [morning and bedtime] and office), serum biomarkers, and urinary biomarkers will be measured. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline in morning home systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure to the end of treatment. The EXCITE-HT study is expected to validate the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide and provide the first evidence for the early use of esaxerenone as a second-line agent in the treatment of Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension instead of its current use as a fourth-line agent.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 867
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A randomized multicenter study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous milrinone and intravenous nitroglycerin in patients with advanced heart failure
    Loh, E
    Elkayam, U
    Cody, R
    Bristow, M
    Jaski, B
    Colucci, WS
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2001, 7 (02) : 114 - 121
  • [22] Efficacy and tolerability of nilvadipine in combination with an angiotensin II receptor antagonist in patients with essential hypertension: A multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled study
    Noda, K
    Ideishi, M
    Tashiro, E
    Nakashima, Y
    Imamura, M
    Seki, M
    Fujino, M
    Sou, T
    Kohara, M
    Kanaya, H
    Saku, N
    Kamei, R
    Yamasaki, M
    Sakai, H
    Gondo, N
    Saku, K
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2003, 64 (03): : 151 - 166
  • [23] Rationale and design of a randomized study to assess the efficacy and safety of evolocumab in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia: The BERSON clinical trial
    Lorenzatti, Alberto J.
    Eliaschewitz, Freddy G.
    Chen, Yundai
    Fialkow, Jonathan
    Lu, Juming
    Baass, Alexis
    Monsalvo, Maria Laura
    Hsu, Hui-Chun
    Somaratne, Ransi
    Ge, Junbo
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 41 (09) : 1117 - 1122
  • [24] A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND, PHASE III STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THE TRIPLE COMBINATION OF AMLODIPINE/LOSARTAN/ROSUVASTATIN IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION
    Lee, H.
    Park, S.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 : E193 - E193
  • [25] The safety and efficacy of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of patients with severe hypertension; A multicenter study
    Aurup, P
    Smith, RD
    Snavely, D
    Oparil, S
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 18 : S99 - S99
  • [26] Safety and efficacy of remimazolam versus propofol during EUS: a multicenter randomized controlled study
    Choe, Jung Wan
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Park, Se Woo
    Oh, Dongwook
    Han, Sung Yong
    Yang, Min Jae
    Kim, Eui Joo
    Cho, Jae Hee
    Lee, Kyong Joo
    Jang, Sung Ill
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 100 (02) : 183 - +
  • [27] A study on the efficacy and safety of losartan in elderly patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension
    Fernández-Vega F.
    Abellan J.
    Sanz De Castro S.
    Cucalón J.M.
    Maceira B.
    Gómez De La Cámara A.
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2001, 32 (4) : 519 - 523
  • [28] Catheter-based renal denervation versus intensified medical treatment in patients with resistant hypertension: Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized study-PRAGUE-15
    Tousek, Petr
    Widimsky, Jiri, Jr.
    Rosa, Jan
    Curila, Karol
    Branny, Marian
    Nykl, Igor
    Taborsky, Milos
    Vaclavik, Jan
    Widimsky, Petr
    COR ET VASA, 2014, 56 (03) : E235 - E239
  • [29] A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Amlodipine Combined Therapy Versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Unresponsive to Fimasartan Monotherapy
    Kim, Kwang-il
    Shin, Mi-Seung
    Ihm, Sang-Hyun
    Youn, Ho-Joong
    Sung, Ki-Chul
    Chae, Shung Chull
    Nam, Chang-Wool
    Seo, Hong Seog
    Park, Seong-Mi
    Rhee, Moo-Yong
    Kim, Moo Hyun
    Cha, Kwang Soo
    Kim, Yong-Jin
    Kim, Jae-Joong
    Chun, Kook Jin
    Yoo, Byung-Su
    Park, Sungha
    Shin, Eun-Seok
    Kim, Dong-Soo
    Kim, Doo Il
    Kim, Kye Hun
    Joo, Seung-Jae
    Jeong, Jin-Ok
    Shin, Jinho
    Kim, Cheol Ho
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 38 (10) : 2159 - 2170
  • [30] Rationale and design of the PLACID study: a randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of inhaled loxapine versus IM aripiprazole in acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
    San, L.
    Estrada, G.
    Oudovenko, N.
    Vieta, E.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 17