The residual cancer burden index as a valid prognostic indicator in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:4
|
作者
Xu, Xin [1 ,5 ]
Zhao, Wei [2 ]
Liu, Cuicui [3 ]
Gao, Yongsheng [4 ]
Chen, Dawei [4 ]
Wu, Meng [4 ]
Li, Chao [4 ]
Wang, Xinzhao [4 ]
Song, Xiang [4 ]
Yu, Jinming [4 ]
Liu, Zhaoyun [4 ]
Yu, Zhiyong [4 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Nat Clin Res Ctr Canc, Tianjins Clin Res Ctr Canc, Key Lab Breast Canc Prevent & Therapy,Canc Inst Ho, Tianjin 300000, Peoples R China
[2] Jining Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Jining 272060, Peoples R China
[3] Liaocheng Peoples Hosp, Liaocheng, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong First Med Univ & Shandong Acad Med Sci, Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Jinan 250117, Shandong, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong First Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Oncol, Tai An 271000, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Residual cancer burden; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Breast cancer; Pathologic complete response; Miller-Payne grading; MESSENGER-RNA LEVELS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-023-11719-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The residual cancer burden index (RCB) was proposed as a response evaluation criterion in breast cancer patients treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC). This study evaluated the relevance of RCB with replase-free survival (RFS). Methods The clinical data of 254 breast cancer patients who received NAC between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively collected. The relationship between clinicopathologic factors and RFS was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RFS estimates were determined by Kaplan-Meier(K-M) analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with RCB. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed the potential of the RCB and MP grading systems as biomarkers for RFS. Results At a median follow-up of 52 months, 59 patients(23.23%) developed relapse. Multivariate Cox regression showed that older age (P = 0.022), high Pathologic T stage after NAC (P = 0.023) and a high RCB score(P = 0.003) were risk factors for relapse. The outcomes of the multivariate logistic analysis indicated that RCB 0 (pathologic complete response [pCR]) was associated with HER2-positive patients (P = 0.002) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (P = 0.013). In addition, the RCB and MP scoring systems served as prognostic markers for patients who received NAC, and their area under curves (AUCs) were 0.691 and 0.342, respectively. Conclusion These data suggest that RCB can be equally applied to predict RFS in Chinese patients with NAC. The application of RCB may help guide the selection of treatment strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of tumoral LDH to predict residual tumor burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Lee, Soo Jung
    Lee, In Hee
    Kang, Byeongju
    Park, Jee-Young Nora
    Lee, Jeeyeon
    Park, Ho Yong
    Park, Ji-Young
    Chae, Yee Soo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
  • [42] Prognostic Significance of Ki67 Index after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Human Breast Cancer
    Tanei, T.
    Shimomura, A.
    Shimazu, K.
    Nakayama, T.
    Kim, S. J.
    Tamaki, Y.
    Noguchi, S.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70
  • [43] Prognostic Significance of Modified Residual Disease in Breast and Nodes (mRDBN) Algorithm After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Clark, Beth Z.
    Farrugia, Daniel J.
    Landmann, Alessandra
    Diego, Emilia J.
    Dabbs, David J.
    Puhalla, Shannon L.
    Jankowitz, Rachel C.
    Brufsky, Adam M.
    Ahrendt, Gretchen M.
    McAuliffe, Priscilla F.
    Bhargava, Rohit
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2018, 149 (04) : 332 - 343
  • [44] Pretreatment Systemic Inflammation Response Index in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator
    Chen, Li
    Kong, Xiangyi
    Wang, Zhongzhao
    Wang, Xiangyu
    Fang, Yi
    Wang, Jing
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 1543 - 1567
  • [45] Breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and residual disease
    Mariana Chávez-MacGregor
    Ana María González-Angulo
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2010, 12 : 461 - 467
  • [46] Breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and residual disease
    Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
    Gonzalez-Angulo, Ana Maria
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 12 (07): : 461 - 467
  • [47] Does Residual Cancer Burden Predict Local Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
    Pestana, Christine V.
    Livasy, Chad
    Donahue, Erin
    Neelands, Brittany
    Tan, Antoinette
    Sarantou, Terry
    Hadzicadic-Gusic, Lejla
    White, Richard
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 2) : 372 - 372
  • [48] Does Residual Cancer Burden Predict Local Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
    Pestana, Christine, V
    Livasy, Chad A.
    Donahue, Erin E.
    Neelands, Brittany
    Tan, Antoinette R.
    Sarantou, Terry
    Hadzikadic-Gusic, Lejla
    White, Richard L. Jr Jr
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (12) : 7716 - 7724
  • [49] High Mitotic Counts after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) Provide Complementary Prognostic Information to Residual Cancer Burden
    Janice, D.
    Lesley, S.
    Nella, S.
    Olivier, L.
    Joseph, S.
    Susan, F.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 45A - 45A
  • [50] Does Residual Cancer Burden Predict Local Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
    Christine V. Pestana
    Chad A. Livasy
    Erin E. Donahue
    Brittany Neelands
    Antoinette R. Tan
    Terry Sarantou
    Lejla Hadzikadic-Gusic
    Richard L. White
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 7716 - 7724