Persistent organic pollutant exposure as a risk factor of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Kouiti, Malak [1 ,2 ]
Castillo-Hermoso, Maria Angeles [1 ]
Youlyouz-Marfak, Ibtissam [2 ]
Khan, Khalid Saeed [1 ,3 ]
Thangaratinam, Shakila [4 ,5 ]
Olmedo-Requena, Rocio [1 ,3 ,6 ,8 ]
Zamora, Javier [3 ,4 ,5 ,7 ]
Jimenez-Moleon, Jose Juan [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Med Prevent & Salud Publ, Granada, Spain
[2] Hassan First Univ Settat, Higher Inst Hlth Sci, Lab Hlth Sci & Technol, Settat, Morocco
[3] Consorcio Ctr Invest Biomed Red Epidemiol & Salud, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Metab & Syst Res, Birmingham, England
[5] Birmingham Womens & Childrens Natl Hlth Serv Fdn T, Birmingham, England
[6] Inst Invest Biosanitaria Ibs GRANADA, Granada, Spain
[7] Hosp Ramon Y Cajal IRYCIS, Clin Biostat Unit, Madrid, Spain
[8] Univ Granada, Dept Med Prevent & Salud Publ, Avda Invest 11,Edificio A, Granada 18016, Spain
关键词
exposure; gestational diabetes mellitus; meta-analysis; persistent organic pollutants; risk factor; systematic review; NESTED CASE-CONTROL; POLYCHLORINATED-BIPHENYLS; ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES; SERUM CONCENTRATIONS; GLUCOSE-HOMEOSTASIS; EARLY-PREGNANCY; ASSOCIATION; SUBSTANCES; TOLERANCE; DIOXINS;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17725
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundFindings related to the association between persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are inconclusive.ObjectivesTo estimate the strength of the association between POP exposure and GDM in a systematic review with meta-analysis.Search strategyMEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science were searched until July 2023.Selection criteriaCohort and case-control studies analysing the association between POPs and GDM.Data collection and analysisWe assessed the risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies scale (QUIPS). Standardised mean differences were pooled using random-effect models.Main resultsSixteen articles including 12 216 participants were selected. The risk of bias was high in four articles (25%), moderate in 11 (68.75%) and low in one (6.25%). Small mean difference between GDM cases and controls was observed for PFHpA (0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.35, I2 = 0.0%), PCB180 (0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.56; I2 = 25.3%), BDE47 (0.23, 95% CI 0.0-0.45, I2 = 0%), BDE99 (0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.59; I2 = 0%), BDE100 (0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.64; I2 = 0%) and HCB (0.22, 95% CI 0.01-0.42, I2 = 39.6%). No considerable difference was observed for the rest of POPs.ConclusionSmall mean differences between GDM cases and controls were observed for some POPs. However, evidence shows mostly moderate quality and results were heterogeneous. Improved research methodology is needed to assess POPs and GDM risk.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 588
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANT EXPOSURE AND GESTATIONAL DIABETES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Kouiti, M.
    Castillo-Hermoso, M. A.
    Lozano-Lorca, M.
    Olmedo-Requena, R.
    Zamora, J.
    Jimenez-Moleon, J.
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2023, 37 : S72 - S72
  • [2] Endometriosis and gestational diabetes mellitus risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Perez-Lopez, Faustino R.
    Martinez-Dominguez, Samuel J.
    Vinas, Andrea
    Perez-Tambo, Raquel
    Lafita, Alberto
    Lajusticia, Hector
    Chedraui, Peter
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 34 (05) : 363 - 369
  • [3] Metalloestrogens exposure and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: Evidence emerging from the systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Wanxin
    Ren, Junjie
    Wang, Juan
    Wang, Jiamei
    Yu, Deshui
    Zhang, Yan
    Zeng, Fa
    Huang, Binbin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 248
  • [4] Age at menarche and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaoting Sun
    Lili Yang
    Jiexue Pan
    Haiyan Yang
    Yanting Wu
    Zimiao Chen
    Xia Chen
    Liangshan Mu
    Endocrine, 2018, 61 : 204 - 209
  • [5] Passive smoking and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Haijie
    Zhou, Xin
    Tian, Lixia
    Huang, Jianjun
    Meng, E.
    Yin, Jinzhu
    TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2023, 21
  • [6] Effect of arsenic on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Rui
    Duan, Min
    Zong, Dongsheng
    Li, Zuojing
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] Age at menarche and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Xiaoting
    Yang, Lili
    Pan, Jiexue
    Yang, Haiyan
    Wu, Yanting
    Chen, Zimiao
    Chen, Xia
    Mu, Liangshan
    ENDOCRINE, 2018, 61 (02) : 204 - 209
  • [8] Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review & meta-analysis
    You, Huaxuan
    Hu, Juan
    Liu, Ying
    Luo, Biru
    Lei, Anjiang
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 154 (01) : 62 - 77
  • [9] The Association Between Cadmium Exposure and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lin, Yu
    Li, Ting
    Xiao, Jiangbo
    Xie, Kaipeng
    Shi, Zhonghua
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 9
  • [10] Antipsychotic Exposure in Pregnancy and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kucukgoncu, Suat
    Guloksuz, Sinan
    Celik, Kubra
    Bahtiyar, Mert Ozan
    Luykx, Jurjen J.
    Rutten, Bart P. F.
    Tek, Cenk
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2020, 46 (02) : 311 - 318