The Association Between Cadmium Exposure and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Lin, Yu [1 ]
Li, Ting [1 ]
Xiao, Jiangbo [1 ]
Xie, Kaipeng [2 ,3 ]
Shi, Zhonghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing Matern & Child Hlth Care Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Womens Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing Matern & Child Hlth Care Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth, Womens Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing Matern & Child Hlth Care Hosp, Dept Women Hlth Care, Womens Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cadmium; gestational diabetes mellitus; meta-analysis; metal; systematic review; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; PREGNANCY; METALS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.555539
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Several studies have evaluated the association of cadmium exposure with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, the findings among these studies have been inconsistent. To further investigate the relationship, we carried out a meta-analysis to clarify the relationship between cadmium exposure and GDM risk. Methods: Five databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and CNKI) were searched for eligible studies until September 09, 2021. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). The summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by random-effects models due to high heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the robustness of the results. Publication bias was evaluated by Egger's test and Begg's test. We also conducted meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis to assess the potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 10 studies with 32,000 participants related to our issue were included. Comparing the highest vs. lowest categories of cadmium exposure, no significant association was observed between cadmium exposure and the risk of GDM (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.92-1.46, and P = 0.206). No publication bias was found in Begg's and Egger's tests (all P > 0.05). Meta-regression suggested that publication year was the potentially heterogeneous source (P = 0.034). Subgroup analysis of publication year showed that the OR of studies before the year of 2016 was 4.05 (95% CI = 1.87-8.76, P < 0.001), and prospective cohort studies showed a borderline increased GDM risk (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.99-1.33, and P = 0.061). Conclusion:Our results indicated no significant association between cadmium exposure and GDM risk. Further high-quality prospective studies, especially those using standard analytic methods for cadmium exposure, are warranted to confirm the results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association Between Periodontitis and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Esteves Lima, Rafael Paschoal
    Cyrino, Renata Magalhaes
    Dutra, Bernardo de Carvalho
    da Silveira, Juliana Oliveira
    Martins, Carolina Castro
    Miranda Cota, Luis Otavio
    Costa, Fernando Oliveira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 87 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [2] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between exposure to potentially toxic elements and gestational diabetes mellitus
    Ridha M. Lefta
    Ahmed Hjazi
    Alla A. Skakodub
    Ammar Dham
    I. B. Sapaev
    Ibrahim Hammoud Khlewee
    Ahmed Hussien Alawadi
    Ali Alsaalamy
    Ruqayah Taher Habash
    Moslem Lari Najafi
    [J]. Environmental Sciences Europe, 36
  • [3] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between exposure to potentially toxic elements and gestational diabetes mellitus
    Lefta, Ridha M.
    Hjazi, Ahmed
    Skakodub, Alla A.
    Dham, Ammar
    Sapaev, I. B.
    Khlewee, Ibrahim Hammoud
    Alawadi, Ahmed Hussien
    Alsaalamy, Ali
    Habash, Ruqayah Taher
    Najafi, Moslem Lari
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2024, 36 (01)
  • [4] The association between serum selenium and gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Askari, Gholamreza
    Iraj, Bijan
    Salehi-Abargouei, Amin
    Fallah, Aziz A.
    Jafari, Tina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 : 195 - 201
  • [5] Systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between seasonal variation and gestational diabetes mellitus
    Khoshhali, Mehri
    Ebrahimpour, Karim
    Shoshtari-Yeganeh, Bahareh
    Kelishadi, Roya
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (40) : 55915 - 55924
  • [6] Association between circulating visfatin and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Wangxin
    Zhao, Dan
    Meng, Zixiu
    Wang, Huachen
    Zhao, Kunsheng
    Feng, Xia
    Li, Yuejin
    Dun, Aishe
    Jin, Xu
    Hou, Haifeng
    [J]. ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2018, 55 (11) : 1113 - 1120
  • [7] Systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between seasonal variation and gestational diabetes mellitus
    Mehri Khoshhali
    Karim Ebrahimpour
    Bahareh Shoshtari-Yeganeh
    Roya Kelishadi
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 55915 - 55924
  • [8] Association between circulating visfatin and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wangxin Zhang
    Dan Zhao
    Zixiu Meng
    Huachen Wang
    Kunsheng Zhao
    Xia Feng
    Yuejin Li
    Aishe Dun
    Xu Jin
    Haifeng Hou
    [J]. Acta Diabetologica, 2018, 55 : 1113 - 1120
  • [9] Association between cadmium exposure and diabetes mellitus risk: a prisma-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Ming
    Song, Jukun
    Zhu, Chen
    Wang, Yadong
    Yin, Xinhai
    Huang, Guanglei
    Zhao, Ke
    Zhu, Jianguo
    Duan, Zhuhui
    Su, Lingkai
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (68) : 113129 - 113141
  • [10] The association between maternal cadmium exposure and small for gestational age: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sezavar, Ahmad Habibian
    Abyareh, Mostafa
    Fahimi, Reza
    Nyasulu, Peter Suwirakwenda
    Abyadeh, Morteza
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (07) : 1469 - 1477