Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders

被引:0
|
作者
Tuz-Hrycyna, Natalia [1 ]
Rzepakowska, Anna [1 ]
Niemczyk, Kazimierz [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ul Banacha 1a, PL-02097 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
disease-specific questionnaire; olfactory dysfunctions; quality of life; subjective assessment; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION; ODOR DISCRIMINATION; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; POSITION PAPER; RISK-FACTORS; DYSFUNCTION; VALIDATION; WHOQOL; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/lio2.1087
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: The comprehensive counseling of patients with olfactory dysfunctions requires accurate diagnosis. The recommendations include subjective assessment. The Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) is a disease-specific questionnaire for the subjective evaluation of olfactory dysfunctions. Material: The study included 54 patients with olfactory dysfunctions, who were recruited to the study group (SG). The other 47 patients without the history of olfactory dysfunction and nasal cavity pathology were voluntarily allocated to the control group (CG). The protocol of the study was introduced to each patient and included: olfactory testing with Sniffin' Stick test, fulfillment of the Polish version of World Health Organization Quality of Life brief questionnaire and completing of the Polish version of the QOD. All participants ( 101) were invited for refilling the QOD questionnaire after 2 weeks for the test-retest statistics. Results: The Polish QOD statements were significantly correlated and met the requirement by having test-retest correlation larger than 0.7. We found that internal consistency of the test measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient was very high. The mean scores of the QOD test in normosmic SG patients were compared with corresponding scores in normosmic CG patients using U Mann-Whitney test. The analysis revealed statistically significant differences on mean QOD scores for each domains except QOD-S between both groups. Conclusions: The Polish version of the QOD demonstrated high rate of the validity and the reliability. This instrument may be widely used in research projects and clinical practice concerning olfactory disorders in Polish patients. Level of Evidence: NA.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 807
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE PAEDIATRIC VOLITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE - CHINESE VERSION
    Liu, Li-Ting
    Pan, Ay-Woan
    Chung, Lylnn
    Gau, Susan Shur-Fen
    Kramer, Jessica
    Lai, Jin-Shei
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [42] Reliability and Validity of the Smart Diet Canadian Version Questionnaire
    Wiens, Linda
    Schulzer, Michael
    Chen, Charlene
    Parinas, Karen
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2010, 110 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [43] Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of Child Health Questionnaire
    Norrby, U
    Nordholm, L
    Fasth, A
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 32 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [44] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in Asthma
    cakmak, Aslihan
    Simsek, Senem
    Ince, Deniz Inal
    Saglam, Melda
    Kutukcue, Ebru Calik
    Yagli, Naciye Vardar
    Karakaya, Guel
    THORACIC RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 24 (04) : 194 - 201
  • [45] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of breathlessness beliefs questionnaire
    Gurses, Hulya Nilgun
    Saka, Seda
    Zeren, Melih
    Bayram, Mehmet
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (04) : 834 - 839
  • [46] Reliability and Validity of the German Version of the Emotional Style Questionnaire
    Jekauc, Darko
    Muelberger, Lea
    Weyland, Susanne
    Ennigkeit, Fabienne
    Wunsch, Kathrin
    Krell-Roesch, Janina
    Fritsch, Julian
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [47] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A PERSIAN VERSION OF THE CHILDHOOD TRAUMA QUESTIONNAIRE
    Garrusi, Behshid
    Nakhaee, Nouzar
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2009, 104 (02) : 509 - 516
  • [48] An Arabic version of the study process questionnaire: Reliability and validity
    Albaili, MA
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1995, 77 (03) : 1083 - 1089
  • [49] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS QUESTIONNAIRE
    SAHIN, NH
    SAHIN, N
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 48 (03) : 334 - 340
  • [50] Freezing of Gait Questionnaire: validity and reliability of the Swedish version
    Nilsson, M. H.
    Hagell, P.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 120 (05): : 331 - 334