Exploring quantitative structure-property relationship models for environmental fate assessment of petroleum hydrocarbons

被引:0
|
作者
Ghosh, Sulekha [1 ]
Chhabria, Mahesh T. [1 ]
Roy, Kunal [2 ]
机构
[1] LM Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Chem, Ahmadabad 380009, Gujarat, India
[2] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Pharmaceut Technol, Drug Theoret & Cheminformat Lab, Kolkata 700032, India
关键词
Petroleum hydrocarbons; Quantitative structure-property relationship; OECD; Biodegradation half-life; Double cross-validation; Best subset selection; Partial least squares; PRIMARY AEROBIC BIODEGRADATION; DEGRADING BACTERIA; QSAR MODELS; OIL; VALIDATION; DEGRADATION; TEMPERATURE; PREDICTIONS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-23904-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The rate and extent of biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in the different aquatic environments is an important element to address. The major avenue for removing petroleum hydrocarbons from the environment is thought to be biodegradation. The present study involves the development of predictive quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models for the primary biodegradation half-life of petroleum hydrocarbons that may be used to forecast the biodegradation half-life of untested petroleum hydrocarbons within the established models' applicability domain. These models use easily computable two-dimensional (2D) descriptors to investigate important structural characteristics needed for the biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in freshwater (dataset 1), temperate seawater (dataset 2), and arctic seawater (dataset 3). All the developed models follow OECD guidelines. We have used double cross-validation, best subset selection, and partial least squares tools for model development. In addition, the small dataset modeler tool has been successfully used for the dataset with very few compounds (dataset 3 with 17 compounds), where dataset division was not possible. The resultant models are robust, predictive, and mechanistically interpretable based on both internal and external validation metrics (R-2 range of 0.605-0.959. Q((Loo))(2) range of 0.509-0.904, and Q(2) (F1) range of 0.526-0.959). The intelligent consensus predictor tool has been used for the improvement of the prediction quality for test set compounds which provided superior outcomes to those from individual partial least squares models based on several metrics (Q(F1)(2) = 0.808 and Q(F2)(2) = 0.805 for dataset 1 in freshwater). Molecular size and hydrophilic factor for freshwater, frequency of two carbon atoms at topological distance 4 for temperate seawater, and electronegative atom count relative to size for arctic seawater were found to be the most significant descriptors responsible for the regulation of biodegradation half-life of petroleum hydrocarbons.
引用
收藏
页码:26218 / 26233
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In Silico Predictions of Human Skin Permeability using Nonlinear Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Models
    Baba, Hiromi
    Takahara, Jun-ichi
    Mamitsuka, Hiroshi
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 32 (07) : 2360 - 2371
  • [32] A Descriptor Set for Quantitative Structure-property Relationship Prediction in Biologics
    Sankar, Kannan
    Trainor, Kyle
    Blazer, Levi L.
    Adams, Jarrett J.
    Sidhu, Sachdev S.
    Day, Tyler
    Meiering, Elizabeth
    Maier, Johannes K. X.
    [J]. MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 2022, 41 (09)
  • [33] A quantitative structure-property relationship analysis of logP for disubstituted benzenes
    Zou, JW
    Zhao, WN
    Shang, ZC
    Huang, ML
    Guo, M
    Yu, QS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2002, 106 (47): : 11550 - 11557
  • [34] Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship on Prediction of Cloud Point of Surfactants
    Yao, Hui-Ling
    Shi, Yuan-Chang
    Yuan, Shi-Ling
    Li, Gan-Zuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DISPERSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 30 (08) : 1223 - 1230
  • [35] Quantitative structure-property relationship research of main group compounds
    Lei Kelin
    Wang Zhendong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WUHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY-MATERIALS SCIENCE EDITION, 2006, 21 (03): : 172 - 173
  • [36] Amino acid profiles and quantitative structure-property relationship models as markers for Merlot and Torrontes wines
    Duchowicz, P. R.
    Giraudo, M. A.
    Castro, E. A.
    Pomilio, A. B.
    [J]. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2013, 140 (1-2) : 210 - 216
  • [37] Prediction of upper flammability limits for fuel mixtures using quantitative structure-property relationship models
    Wang, Beibei
    Xu, Kaili
    Wang, Qingsheng
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 206 (02) : 247 - 253
  • [38] Conjugated quantitative structure-property relationship models: Prediction of kinetic characteristics linked by the Arrhenius equation
    Zankov, Dmitry
    Madzhidov, Timur
    Baskin, Igor
    Varnek, Alexandre
    [J]. MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 2023, 42 (10)
  • [39] Thermal hazard assessment and ranking for organic peroxides using quantitative structure-property relationship approaches
    Pan, Yong
    Qi, Ronghua
    He, Pei
    Shen, Ruiqing
    Jiang, Jiajia
    Ni, Lei
    Jiang, Juncheng
    Wang, Qingsheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2020, 140 (05) : 2575 - 2583
  • [40] Validation of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) and Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) approaches as alternatives to skin sensitization risk assessment
    Lee, Byung-Mu
    Kim, Ji Yun
    Kim, Kyu-Bong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, 2021, 84 (23): : 945 - 959