Outcome of laparotomy and conservative treatment of patients with acute mesenteric venous ischemia with viable bowel

Background Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is one of the most serious abdominal emergencies. Predicting the onset of bowel necrosis that warrants surgical intervention is of paramount importance in AMI. The present study aimed to investigate the outcome of patients with AMI secondary to mesenteric venous occlusion (MVO) and the consequence of non-therapeutic exploratory laparotomy. Methods The records of 132 patients with AMI were retrospectively reviewed. The outcome of patients with acute mesenteric venous ischemia (AMVI) and viable bowel was analyzed based on the method of treatment: conservative versus surgical. The impact of non-therapeutic laparotomy on the outcome of patients with AMVI in terms of morbidity, readmission, and mortality was analyzed. Results Forty-seven patients (34 male) with AMVI had viable bowel. Of the 47 patients with viable bowel, 8 (17%) had an exploratory non-therapeutic laparotomy, whereas 39 patients were treated conservatively. Patients who had non-therapeutic laparotomy had significantly higher complication (50 vs 5.1%, p = 0.005) and readmission rates (37.5 vs 5.1%, p = 0.03) and longer hospital stay (8.5 vs 7 days, p = 0.02) than those treated conservatively. Patients with bowel necrosis who had a therapeutic laparotomy had slightly lower rates of morbidity and mortality as compared to patients with viable bowel who underwent a non-therapeutic laparotomy. Conclusion Careful assessment and informed decision-making in patients with AMVI are crucial to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention that can result in higher rates of complications and readmission and extended hospital stay.