Implications of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on South Korean industries: Challenges and policy recommendations

被引:2
|
作者
Cho, Bong-Kyung [1 ]
Jung, Hail [2 ]
Chung, Ji-Bum [1 ]
Song, Chang-Keun [3 ]
机构
[1] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Dept Civil Urban & Earth & Environm Engn, Ulsan, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Business Adm, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Grad Sch Carbon Neutral, Ulsan, South Korea
关键词
Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism; Emission trading scheme; Carbon footprint; Carbon leakage; EU-ETS; TRADING SCHEME; STANDARDS; RULES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141278
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examines the effects of the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) on South Korean industries. Concerns about carbon leakage, where carbon emissions increase in countries or regions with less stringent climate policies, have grown recently. Specifically, firms strategically relocate their operations to countries with lower carbon costs, where they can produce goods more cheaply and without carbon constraints. CBAM is a carbon tariff on carbon intensive products imported by the European Union. While the CBAM has the potential to reduce global carbon emissions, it poses significant risks to South Korea, which relies heavily on exports of CBAM-affected products. This study provides an overview of the potential effects of the CBAM on industries in South Korea, applies event study analysis to quantitatively evaluate how the financial market has reacted to CBAM-related events. Based on the research findings, as the details of CBAM become clearer, there is a shift in perception from environmental goals to broader issues across industries. Building on this understanding, we discuss issues related to the CBAM enactment: firm-level carbon accounting, EC-certified accreditation institutions, and the carbon allowance price gap between the EU and South Korea. We propose necessary shortterm and long-term policies to attenuate CBAM-related risks.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evolutionary Game Analysis of Responding to the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
    Huang, Tao
    Liu, Zhixin
    Zhao, Tian
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (02)
  • [32] China's Strategies for Responding to the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
    Hu Guosong
    Chen Youjuan
    China Oil & Gas, 2023, (06) : 48 - 53
  • [33] EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Will It Achieve Its Objective(s)?
    Sato, Sakuya
    JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 2022, 56 (03) : 383 - 404
  • [34] Impact assessment of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on product export costs
    Zhang, Lan-Xin
    Wen, Zong-Guo
    Xu, Mao
    Hu, Zhe
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2024, 44 (04): : 1788 - 1794
  • [35] Threatening the Poor? The economic impacts of carbon border adjustment mechanism on developing countries
    Lin, Boqiang
    Zhao, Hengsong
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2024, 71 : 582 - 593
  • [36] Article The carbon border adjustment mechanism is inefficient in addressing carbon and results in unfair welfare losses
    Sun, Xinlu
    Mi, Zhifu
    Cheng, Lu
    Coffman, D'Maris
    Liu, Yu
    FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 4 (03): : 660 - 670
  • [37] CARBON BORDER ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: A NEW TOOL OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
    Varnavskii, Vladimir G.
    MIROVAYA EKONOMIKA I MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA, 2023, 67 (01): : 5 - 15
  • [38] Impacts of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism(CBAM) on the Transformation of High Carbon Emission Enterprises in China
    Zhang Jingqi
    Zhang Junfeng
    China Oil & Gas, 2021, 28 (03) : 53 - 56
  • [39] The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism will exacerbate the economic-carbon inequality in the plastic trade
    Ren, Yanan
    Liu, Guangxin
    Shi, Lei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 332
  • [40] South Korean green growth and the Jevons paradox: An assessment with democratic and degrowth policy recommendations
    Gunderson, Ryan
    Yun, Sun-Jin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 144 : 239 - 247