Management of low back pain and lumbosacral radicular syndrome: the Guideline of the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF)

被引:1
|
作者
Apeldoorn, Adri T. [1 ]
Swart, Nynke M. [2 ]
Conijn, Danielle [2 ]
Meerhoff, Guus A. [2 ]
Ostelo, Raymond W. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep Alkmaar, Dept Rehabil, Wilhelminalaan 12, NL-1815 JD Alkmaar, Netherlands
[2] Royal Dutch Soc Phys Therapy, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sci Res Inst, Fac Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Free Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Data Sci, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Practice guideline; Physical therapy; Low back pain; Radiculopathy; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SPINAL MANIPULATIVE THERAPY; CLINICAL-PREDICTION RULE; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS; FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS; MANUAL THERAPY; PRIMARY-CARE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MCKENZIE METHOD; MOTOR CONTROL;
D O I
10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08352-7
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Significant progress and new insights have been gained since the Dutch Physical Therapy guideline on low back pain (LBP) in 2013 and the Cesar en Mensendieck guideline in 2009, necessitating an update of these guidelines. AIM: To update and develop an evidence-based guideline for the comprehensive management of LBP and lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) without serious specific conditions (red fiags) for Dutch physical therapists and Cesar and Mensendieck Therapists. DESIGN: Clinical practice guideline. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient. POPULATION: Adults with LBP and/or LRS. METHODS: Clinically relevant questions were identified based on perceived barriers in current practice of physical therapy. All clinical questions were answered using published guidelines, systematic reviews, narrative reviews or systematic reviews performed by the project group. Recommendations were formulated based on evidence and additional considerations, as described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence-to-Decision framework. Patients participated in every phase. RESULTS: The guideline describes a comprehensive assessment based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for LBP and LRS, including the identification of alarm symptoms and red fiags. Patients are assigned to three treatment profiles (low, moderate and high risk of persistent symptoms) based on prognostic factors for persistent LBP. The guideline recommends offering simple and less intensive support to people who are likely to recover quickly (low-risk profile) and more complex and intensive support to people with a moderate or high risk of persistent complaints. Criteria for initiating and discontinuing physical therapy, and referral to a general practitioner are specified. Recommendations are formulated for information and advice, measurement instruments, active and passive interventions and behavior-oriented treatment. CONCLUSIONS: An evidence based physical therapy guideline for the management of patients with LBP and LRS without red fiags for physical therapists and Cesar and Mensendieck therapists was developed. Cornerstones of physical therapy assessment and treatment are risk stratification, shared decision-making, information and advice, and exercises.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 318
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effectiveness of physical therapy for low back pain
    Kollisch, Donald O.
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2008, 77 (06) : 746 - +
  • [22] Physical rehabilitation therapy in low back pain
    Banciu, M
    Sanmarghitan, G
    Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine ISPRM, 2005, : 935 - 936
  • [23] Physical therapy management of low back pain: An exploratory survey of therapist approaches
    Li, LC
    Bombardier, C
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2001, 81 (04): : 1018 - 1028
  • [24] Spinal decompression therapy as an alternative modality for management of low back pain and radicular pain caused by lumbar disc herniation or protrusion
    Ahmed Ramzy El-Zayat
    Wael Gomah
    Ahmed H. Aldesouky
    Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 2019, 46 (3) : 183 - 188
  • [25] Comparison of the Oblique Interlaminar and Transforaminal Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Treatment of Low Back and Lumbosacral Radicular Pain
    Choi, Eun-Ji
    Park, Soon Ji
    Yoo, Yeong-Min
    Yoon, Ji-Uk
    Shin, Sang-Wook
    Byeon, Gyeong-Jo
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 407 - 414
  • [26] Lateral Parasagittal Versus Midline Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection for Management of Low Back Pain with Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized Study
    Ghai, Babita
    Vadaje, Kaivalya Sadashiv
    Wig, Jyotsna
    Dhillon, Mandeep Singh
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 117 (01): : 219 - 227
  • [27] Cauda Equina Syndrome in a Pregnant Woman Referred to Physical Therapy for Low Back Pain
    O'Laughlin, Shaun J.
    Kokosinski, Eileen
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2008, 38 (11): : 721 - 721
  • [28] Comparison of transforaminal verse interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with lumbosacral radicular pain: a meta-analysis of the literature
    Guo Wei
    Jie Liang
    Bo Chen
    Caisheng Zhou
    Neng Ru
    Jianfeng Chen
    Fan Zhang
    International Orthopaedics, 2016, 40 : 2533 - 2545
  • [29] Comparison of transforaminal verse interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with lumbosacral radicular pain: a meta-analysis of the literature
    Wei, Guo
    Liang, Jie
    Chen, Bo
    Zhou, Caisheng
    Ru, Neng
    Chen, Jianfeng
    Zhang, Fan
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 40 (12) : 2533 - 2545
  • [30] Surgery for Low Back Pain A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline
    Chou, Roger
    Baisden, Jamie
    Carragee, Eugene J.
    Resnick, Daniel K.
    Shaffer, William O.
    Loeser, John D.
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (10) : 1094 - 1109