Lecture capture affects student learning behaviour

被引:5
|
作者
Voelkel, Susanne [1 ]
Bates, Andy [1 ]
Gleave, Terry [1 ]
Larsen, Carl [1 ]
Stollar, Elliott J. [1 ]
Wattret, Gemma [1 ]
Mello, Luciane V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Life Sci, Crown St, Liverpool L69 7ZB, Merseyside, England
来源
FEBS OPEN BIO | 2023年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
biological sciences; education; lecture podcast; lecture recording; lecture screencast; study behaviour; ATTENDANCE; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; RECORDINGS;
D O I
10.1002/2211-5463.13548
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Lecture capture (the real-time recording of live lectures) has become commonplace in higher education. It is popular with students who like the associated flexibility and believe that lecture recordings improve their grades. Here, we performed a survey (n = 694, 53% of the cohort) and set up focus groups (2 focus groups, 15 participants) to explore biological sciences students' perceptions of how lecture capture impacts their study behaviour when recordings are provided for every lecture and are made available to students without restriction. The participants in our study were convinced that lecture capture improved their learning, and many students noted that they were dependent on the recordings, thinking that without them, they would not be able to achieve good grades. Students reported that they spend a considerable amount of time watching recordings and making verbatim notes, leaving them little time for independent study. For many, lecture capture seems to reinforce the view that memorisation equals learning, a view that may be reinforced by knowledge-focussed assessment formats. For most students, lecture capture did not affect self-reported live lecture attendance patterns. However, about one-third of the participants reported skipping more classes, and the same participants were more likely to postpone catching up on missed lectures. The outcomes of our study suggest that lecture capture provision may negatively affect some students' attendance and study behaviour, and thus, we suggest more needs to be done to mitigate against this.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 232
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of digital distraction on lecture note taking and student learning
    Abraham E. Flanigan
    Scott Titsworth
    Instructional Science, 2020, 48 : 495 - 524
  • [42] The impact of digital distraction on lecture note taking and student learning
    Flanigan, Abraham E.
    Titsworth, Scott
    INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2020, 48 (05) : 495 - 524
  • [43] To Do or To Listen? Student Active Learning vs. the Lecture
    Opdal, Pal Anders
    STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION, 2022, 41 (01) : 71 - 89
  • [44] Anxious behaviour in a demonstrator affects observational learning
    Ida Selbing
    Andreas Olsson
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [45] Dynamic e-learning modules for student lecture preparation
    McIntyre, Timothy
    Wegener, Margaret
    McGrath, Dominic
    TEACHING & LEARNING INQUIRY-THE ISSOTL JOURNAL, 2018, 6 (01): : 126 - 145
  • [46] Research Participation Versus Classroom Lecture: A Comparison of Student Learning
    Elliott, Lisa Jo
    Rice, Stephen
    Trafimow, David
    Madson, Laura
    Hipshur, Malisa F.
    TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 37 (02) : 129 - 131
  • [47] Clickers in a large lecture class: Student impressions and perceived learning
    Williamson, Vickie M.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [48] Student Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Asynchronous Online Lecture Videos
    Choe, Ronny C.
    Scuric, Zorica
    Eshkol, Ethan
    Cruser, Sean
    Arndt, Ava
    Cox, Robert
    Toma, Shannon P.
    Shapiro, Casey
    Levis-Fitzgerald, Marc
    Barnes, Greg
    Crosbie, Rachelle H.
    CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2019, 18 (04):
  • [49] To Do or To Listen? Student Active Learning vs. the Lecture
    Pål Anders Opdal
    Studies in Philosophy and Education, 2022, 41 : 71 - 89
  • [50] Student Perceptions of Learning and Engagement in a Flipped Versus Lecture Course
    Garner, Benjamin
    Chan, Mark
    BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2019, 82 (03) : 357 - 369