Does environmental regulation improve firms' export product quality? Empirical evidence based on China's key regional air pollution and control policy

被引:3
|
作者
Jiang, Yan [1 ]
Tang, Long [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Cui [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Univ, Sch Econ, Jiaxing 314001, Peoples R China
[3] Jiaxing Univ, Inst China Common Prosper Res, Jiaxing 314001, Peoples R China
[4] 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Export product quality; Resource reallocation effect; Porter effect; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; INNOVATION; COMPETITIVENESS; PRICES; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNMENT; EMISSIONS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139822
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Promoting high-quality export development is a crucial strategic decision for economic transformation and upgrading. However, the effects and potential mechanisms of environmental regulations on firms' export product quality remain a subject of debate. This study investigates the impact of environmental regulations on firms' export product quality by analyzing firm-level data from 2000 to 2013. The study employs a quasi-natural experiment that focuses on the Key Air Pollution Control Zone (KRAPC) implemented by the central government in 2010. We found that environmental regulations, as represented by this policy, significantly enhance the firms' export product quality. At the macro perspective, this improvement primarily stems from the reduction of air pollution in the designated areas, and advancements in regional innovation and human capital. At the micro perspective, the main mechanisms are the reallocation of resources and the "Porter effect". The former mainly involves reducing the production scale or even withdrawing high-energy-consuming and high-polluting enterprises, resulting in improved export product quality among new market entrants. The latter is manifested through enhanced enterprise innovation abilities, increased productivity, and reduced production costs. Furthermore, the impact of the KRAPC policy on firms' export product quality varies depending on factors such as ownership, size, and technology intensity. In addition, the policy has positive spillover effects on neighboring non-key areas. Therefore, this study supports the government in formulating a scientific environmental policy that promotes a mutually beneficial relationship between economic growth and environmental protection.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental Regulation and Chronic Conditions: Evidence from China's Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan
    Zhao, Yang
    Kim, Beomsoo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [22] Environmental regulation and labor demand: Evidence from China's air pollution prevention and Control Action Plan
    Qin, Fen
    Liu, Zhe
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (13)
  • [23] Does Enterprise Internal Control Improve Environmental Performance-Empirical Evidence from China
    Tao, Lijuan
    Wei, Xiaoju
    Wang, Wenjing
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [24] Does Environmental Regulation Promote Eco-Innovation Performance of Manufacturing Firms?-Empirical Evidence from China
    Wang, Jieqiong
    Hu, Shichao
    Zhang, Ziyi
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (06)
  • [25] How does the impact of a two-stage air pollution control policy on air quality different? Evidence from 258 cities in China
    Li, Lanlan
    He, Minzheng
    Liang, Xue
    Deng, Haiyuan
    Yang, Ranran
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (07)
  • [26] Labor market impact of China's cross-regional environmental regulation on pollution-intensive firms
    Bu, Caiqi
    Shi, Daqian
    Zhang, Kaixia
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 67 (12) : 3026 - 3050
  • [27] Does environmental regulation policy help improve business performance of manufacturing enterprises? evidence from China
    Yu Zhang
    Jie Wang
    Jiakai Chen
    Weizhong Liu
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 4335 - 4364
  • [28] Does environmental regulation policy help improve business performance of manufacturing enterprises? evidence from China
    Zhang, Yu
    Wang, Jie
    Chen, Jiakai
    Liu, Weizhong
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (05) : 4335 - 4364
  • [29] Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical evidence from China
    Gu, Guangtong
    Zheng, Haorong
    Tong, Lingyun
    Dai, Yaxian
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 163
  • [30] ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, REGIONAL INNOVATION AND URBAN POLLUTION CONTROL. EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA
    Chiu, Yu-Wen
    Chen, Hong
    Li, Sheng Tun
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 22 (09): : 1587 - 1594