Does environmental regulation improve firms' export product quality? Empirical evidence based on China's key regional air pollution and control policy

被引:3
|
作者
Jiang, Yan [1 ]
Tang, Long [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Cui [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Univ, Sch Econ, Jiaxing 314001, Peoples R China
[3] Jiaxing Univ, Inst China Common Prosper Res, Jiaxing 314001, Peoples R China
[4] 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Export product quality; Resource reallocation effect; Porter effect; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; INNOVATION; COMPETITIVENESS; PRICES; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNMENT; EMISSIONS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139822
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Promoting high-quality export development is a crucial strategic decision for economic transformation and upgrading. However, the effects and potential mechanisms of environmental regulations on firms' export product quality remain a subject of debate. This study investigates the impact of environmental regulations on firms' export product quality by analyzing firm-level data from 2000 to 2013. The study employs a quasi-natural experiment that focuses on the Key Air Pollution Control Zone (KRAPC) implemented by the central government in 2010. We found that environmental regulations, as represented by this policy, significantly enhance the firms' export product quality. At the macro perspective, this improvement primarily stems from the reduction of air pollution in the designated areas, and advancements in regional innovation and human capital. At the micro perspective, the main mechanisms are the reallocation of resources and the "Porter effect". The former mainly involves reducing the production scale or even withdrawing high-energy-consuming and high-polluting enterprises, resulting in improved export product quality among new market entrants. The latter is manifested through enhanced enterprise innovation abilities, increased productivity, and reduced production costs. Furthermore, the impact of the KRAPC policy on firms' export product quality varies depending on factors such as ownership, size, and technology intensity. In addition, the policy has positive spillover effects on neighboring non-key areas. Therefore, this study supports the government in formulating a scientific environmental policy that promotes a mutually beneficial relationship between economic growth and environmental protection.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Air pollution and firms' export product quality: Evidence from China
    Chen, Bo
    He, Zhenyu
    Tang, Yuwei
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [2] Local environmental constraints and firms' export product quality: Evidence from China
    He, Zhenyu
    Tang, Yuwei
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 124
  • [3] Corporate responses to air quality regulation: Evidence from a regional environmental policy in China
    Mao, Jie
    Wang, Chunhua
    Yin, Haitao
    REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2023, 98
  • [4] Does environmental regulation improve public health? Evidence from China's Two Control Zones policy
    Yang, Ningze
    Liu, Ziwei
    Lin, Yuxi
    Yang, Yongliang
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [5] Does Environmental Regulation Affect Export Quality? Theory and Evidence from China
    Xie, Jing
    Sun, Qi
    Wang, Shaohong
    Li, Xiaoping
    Fan, Fei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (21) : 1 - 22
  • [6] The Effects of Air Pollution on Firms' Internal Control Quality: Evidence from China
    Liu, Siyi
    Yang, Daoguang
    Liu, Nian
    Liu, Xin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (18)
  • [7] Environmental Regulation and Exports: Evidence from the Comprehensive Air Pollution Policy in China
    Chen, Hong
    Xu, Yang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (03) : 1 - 12
  • [8] Does Environmental Regulation Improve an Enterprise's Productivity?-Evidence from China's Carbon Reduction Policy
    Lou, Yanfeng
    Tian, Yezhuang
    Tang, Xueliang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (17)
  • [9] TAX COMPETITION, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND AIR POLLUTION - EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM 278 CITIES IN CHINA
    Shangguan, Xuming
    Wang, Xingyuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 20 (04): : 635 - 644
  • [10] The impact of air pollution on regional innovation: empirical evidence based on 267 cities in China
    Wang M.
    Hou H.
    Zhang M.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (19) : 27730 - 27748