Evaluation of the Performance of CMIP6 Climate Models in Simulating Rainfall over the Philippines

被引:2
|
作者
Ignacio-Reardon, Shelly Jo Igpuara [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Jing-jia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Inst Climate & Applicat Res ICAR, CIC FEMD, KLME,ILCEC, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Coll Atmospher Sci, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Tallahasee Community Coll, Sci & Math Dept, Tallahassee, FL 32304 USA
关键词
CMIP6; rainy season; rain simulations; bias; Philippines; MONSOON; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/atmos14091459
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Philippines is highly vulnerable to multiple climate-related hazards due to its geographical location and weak adaptation measures. Floods are the most catastrophic hazards that impact lives, livelihoods, and, consequently, the economy at large. Understanding the ability of the general circulation models to simulate the observed rainfall using the latest state-of-the-art model is essential for reliable forecasting. Based on this background, this paper objectively aims at assessing and ranking the capabilities of the recent Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models in simulating the observed rainfall over the Philippines. The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) v2.3 was used as a proxy to gauge the performance of 11 CMIP6 models in simulating the annual and rainy-season rainfall during 1980-2014. Several statistical metrics (mean, standard deviation, normalized root means square error, percentage bias, Pearson correlation coefficient, Mann-Kendall test, Theil-Sen slope estimator, and skill score) and geospatial measures were assessed. The results show that that CMIP6 historical simulations exhibit satisfactory effectiveness in simulating the annual cycle, though some models display wet/dry biases. The CMIP6 models generally underestimate rainfall on the land but overestimate it over the ocean. The trend analysis shows that rainfall over the country is insignificantly increasing both annually and during the rainy seasons. Notably, most of the models could correctly simulate the trend sign but over/underestimate the magnitude. The CMIP6 historical rainfall simulating models significantly agree on simulating the mean annual cycle but diverge in temporal ability simulation. The performance of the models remarkably differs from one metric to another and among different time scales. Nevertheless, the models may be ranked from the best to the least best at simulating the Philippines' rainfall in the order GFDL, NOR, ACCESS, ENS, MRI, CMCC, NESM, FIO, MIROC, CESM, TAI, and CAN. The findings of this study form a good basis for the selection of models to be used in robust future climate projection and impact studies regarding the Philippines. The climate model developers may use the documented shortcoming of these models and improve their physical parametrization for better performance in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of CMIP6 models in simulating the statistics of extreme precipitation over Eastern Africa
    Akinsanola, Akintomide Afolayan
    Ongoma, Victor
    Kooperman, Gabriel J.
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2021, 254
  • [22] Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 Models in Simulating Climate over China and the East Asian Monsoon
    Dabang Jiang
    Dan Hu
    Zhiping Tian
    Xianmei Lang
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2020, 37 : 1102 - 1118
  • [23] Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 Models in Simulating Climate over China and the East Asian Monsoon
    Dabang JIANG
    Dan HU
    Zhiping TIAN
    Xianmei LANG
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2020, 37 (10) : 1102 - 1134
  • [24] Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 Models in Simulating Climate over China and the East Asian Monsoon
    Jiang, Dabang
    Hu, Dan
    Tian, Zhiping
    Lang, Xianmei
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2020, 37 (10) : 1102 - 1118
  • [25] Performance of CMIP6 models over South America
    Bazzanela, Anna Carolina
    Dereczynski, Claudine
    Luiz-Silva, Wanderson
    Regoto, Pedro
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2024, 62 (02) : 1501 - 1516
  • [26] Performance of CMIP6 models over South America
    Anna Carolina Bazzanela
    Claudine Dereczynski
    Wanderson Luiz-Silva
    Pedro Regoto
    Climate Dynamics, 2024, 62 : 1501 - 1516
  • [27] Performance evaluation of CMIP6 in simulating extreme precipitation in Madagascar
    Tanteliniaina, Mirindra Finaritra Rabezanahary
    Zhai, Jun
    Andrianarimanana, Mihasina Harinaivo
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2024, 155 (05) : 4089 - 4100
  • [28] Performance evaluation of CMIP6 in simulating extreme precipitation in Madagascar
    Mirindra Finaritra Rabezanahary Tanteliniaina
    Jun Zhai
    Mihasina Harinaivo Andrianarimanana
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2024, 155 : 4089 - 4100
  • [29] Projected changes in rainfall over Uganda based on CMIP6 models
    Ngoma, Hamida
    Ayugi, Brian
    Onyutha, Charles
    Babaousmail, Hassen
    Sian, Kenny T. C. Lim Kam
    Iyakaremye, Vedaste
    Mumo, Richard
    Ongoma, Victor
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 149 (3-4) : 1117 - 1134
  • [30] Projected changes in rainfall over Uganda based on CMIP6 models
    Hamida Ngoma
    Brian Ayugi
    Charles Onyutha
    Hassen Babaousmail
    Kenny T. C. Lim Kam Sian
    Vedaste Iyakaremye
    Richard Mumo
    Victor Ongoma
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 149 : 1117 - 1134