Effect of abutment design on fracture resistance of resin-matrix ceramic crowns for dental implant restoration: an in vitro study

被引:2
|
作者
Lin, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cai, Pingping [1 ]
Zhuo, Yingying [1 ]
Lin, Ling [1 ]
Zheng, Zhiqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Fujian Key Lab Oral Dis, 246 Yangqiao Zhong Rd, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Nippon Dent Univ Tokyo, Sch Life Dent Tokyo, Dept Crown & Bridge, 1 9 20 Fujimi,Chiyoda ku, Tokyo 1028159, Japan
[3] Nippon Dent Univ Tokyo, Sch Life Dent Tokyo, 1 9 20 Fujimi,Chiyoda ku, Tokyo 1028159, Japan
关键词
Resin-matrix ceramics; Fracture resistant; Dental implant restoration; Crown thickness; Abutment; CAD/CAM-MATERIALS; BOND STRENGTH; PERFORMANCE; PROSTHESES; WEAR;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-023-03100-0
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to investigate the performance and fracture resistance of different resin-matrix ceramic materials for use in implant-supported single crowns with respect to the abutment design (crown thickness: 1 mm, 2 and 3 mm).MethodsForty-eight abutments and crowns were fabricated on implants in the right lower first molar. Two resin-matrix ceramic materials for dental crowns were selected for study: (1) a glass-ceramic in a resin interpenetrating matrix (Vita Enamic, Vita, Germany) and (2) a resin-based composite with nanoparticle ceramic filler (Lava Ultimate, 3 M ESPE, USA). Three types of abutments were designed: 1 mm thick crown + custom titanium abutment, 2 mm thick crown + custom titanium abutment and 3 mm thick crown + prefabricated titanium abutment. The experiment was divided into 6 groups (n = 8) according to the crown materials and abutment designs. After 10,000 thermocycles, fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. The statistical significance of differences between various groups were analysed with ANOVA followed by a post hoc Tukey's honestly significant difference test. The surfaces of the fractured specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM).ResultsTwo-way ANOVA revealed that the abutment design (F = 28.44, P = 1.52 x 10(- 8)<0.001) and the crown materials (F = 4.37, P = 0.043 < 0.05) had a significant effect on the fracture resistance of implant crown restoration. The Lava Ultimate-2 mm group showed the highest fracture resistance of 2222.74 & PLUSMN; 320.36 N, and the Vita Enamic-3 mm group showed the lowest fracture resistance of 1204.96 & PLUSMN; 130.50 N. Most of the 1 and 2 mm groups had partial crown fractures that could be repaired directly with resin, while the 3 mm group had longitudinal fracture of the crown, and the crowns were detached from the abutments.ConclusionBased on the in vitro data of this study, the fracture resistance of the 2 mm thick resin-matrix ceramic crown design was higher than that of the 1 and 3 mm groups. The 2 mm thick resin-matrix ceramic crown and personalized abutment are an option to replace zirconia for implant crown restoration.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influence of crown design and material on chipping-resistance of all-ceramic molar crowns: An in vitro study
    Alsarani, Majed
    De Souza, Grace
    Rizkalla, Amin
    El-Mowafy, Omar
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2018, 55 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [42] Implant Angulation Effect on the Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Custom Abutments: An In Vitro Study
    Katsavochristou, Anastasia
    Sierraalta, Marianella
    Saglik, Berna
    Koumoulis, Dimitrios
    George, Furat
    Razzoog, Michael
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (05): : 394 - 400
  • [43] Effect of novel restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of teeth treated endodontically: An in vitro study
    Kemaloglu, Hande
    Emin Kaval, Mehmet
    Turkun, Murat
    Micoogullari Kurt, Seniha
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2015, 34 (05) : 618 - 622
  • [44] In vitro study of fracture incidence and compressive fracture load of all-ceramic crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer and other luting agents
    Leevailoj, C
    Platt, JA
    Cochran, MA
    Moore, BK
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 80 (06): : 699 - 707
  • [45] Marginal gap and fracture resistance of implant-supported 3D-printed definitive composite crowns: An in vitro study
    Donmez, Mustafa Borga
    Okutan, Yener
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 124
  • [46] Comparative Effect of No Finish Line, Heavy Chamfer, and Shoulder Marginal Designs on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia (Cercon) Ceramic Restoration: An In Vitro Study
    Gavara, Sai Govind
    Jain, Shashikala
    Gupta, Himanshu
    Sharma, Suraj
    Panwar, Pratibha
    Momin, Mariyam S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [47] Fracture Resistance of Resin Matrix Ceramic Post and Core Compared to Prefabricated Fiber-Reinforced Composite Post and Core in Non-Ferrule Effect Teeth: An In Vitro Study
    Kunawongkrit, Keeratikarn
    Mahardawi, Basel
    Nan, Pheeradej Na
    Laoharungpisit, Palawat
    Ratanakupt, Kwanchanok
    Aimjirakul, Napapa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2025,
  • [48] Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: An in vitro study
    Att, W
    Kurun, S
    Gerds, T
    Strub, JR
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2006, 95 (02): : 111 - 116
  • [49] Fracture Resistance of Roots Filled With Bio-Ceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: In Vitro Study
    Almohaimede, Amal
    Almanie, Daniah
    Alaathy, Sara
    Almadi, Ebtissam
    EUROPEAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2020, 5 (02): : 134 - 137
  • [50] The effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics (In vitro study)
    Muhammed, Heba A.
    Mahmoud, Elsayed M.
    Fahmy, Amal E.
    Nasr, Dina M.
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)