Patient and System Factors Associated With Completed Follow-Up of Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Breast Imaging Findings

被引:1
|
作者
Giess, Catherine S. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Lynch, Elyse [2 ]
Lacson, Ronilda [2 ,3 ]
Kapoor, Neena [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Desai, Sonali [6 ]
Khorasani, Ramin [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Imaging, Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Imaging, Boston, MA USA
[4] Mass Gen Brigham Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Patient Experience, Boston, MA USA
[5] Brigham Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Imaging, Mass Gen Brigham Hlth Syst,Qual Safety Patient Exp, Boston, MA USA
[8] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Breast; follow-up; imaging; probably benign; AREA DEPRIVATION; WOMEN; DISADVANTAGE; CATEGORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.028
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Evaluate patient factors and health system test ordering and scheduling processes associated with completed BI-RADS 3 breast imaging follow-up.Methods: Retrospective review of reports from January 1, 2021, to July 31, 2021, identified BI-RADS 3 findings corresponding to unique patient encounters (index examinations). The electronic health record was queried for patient, examination, and health system ordering or scheduling data including follow-up order status (order placed, performed; order placed, scheduled, but not performed; order placed, unscheduled; no order placed); ordering provider specialty and health system affiliation (primary care versus other, internal versus external to health system); and ordering department (radiology staff versus referring physician staff). Patient home addresses were categorized by area deprivation index (University of Wisconsin's Neighborhood Atlas). Univariable and multivariable analysis identified patient, examination, and ordering or scheduling factors associated with completed follow-up imaging within 15 months of BI-RADS 3 assessment.Results: There were 3,104 unique BI-RADS 3 assessments, 2,561 (82.5%) with completed BI-RADS 3 follow-up within 15 months of study examination. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with incomplete follow-up included ultrasound (odds ratio [OR] 0.48; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.38-0.60; P < .001) and MRI (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.50-1.00; P = .049) versus mammogram; patients living in the highest disadvantaged neighborhoods (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50-0.98; P = .04); patients <40 years (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.11-0.19; P < .001); Asian race (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37-0.81; P = .003); order placement >3 months (OR, 0.05; 95% CI 0.02-0.16; P < .001) after index examination or scheduling >6 months after order placement (OR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.87; P = .02); order placement by breast oncology or breast surgery departments (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.17-0.73; P = .01) versus radiology department.Discussion: Incomplete BI-RADS 3 follow-up is associated with ultrasound or MRI, most socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, younger patients, Asian race, delayed order entry, and follow-up examination ordering and scheduling by non-radiology departments.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 901
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rate of Malignancy in MRI-Detected Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Lesions
    Spick, Claudio
    Szolar, Dieter H. M.
    Baltzer, Pascal A.
    Tillich, Manfred
    Reittner, Pia
    Preidler, Klaus W.
    Pinker-Domenig, Katja
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (03) : 684 - 689
  • [32] Probably benign breast lesions on ultrasonography: A retrospective review of ultrasonographic features and clinical factors affecting the BI-RADS categorization
    Moon, Hee Jung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Kwak, Jin Young
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (04) : 375 - 382
  • [33] Patient Compliance in the Setting of BI-RADS Category 3: What Factors Impact Compliance With Short-Term Follow-Up Recommendations?
    Borders, Marisa H.
    Cheng, Lucy
    Fitzpatrick, Kimberly A.
    Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (01): : 77 - 82
  • [34] Follow-Up of BI-RADS 3 Breast Mammograms, Results of a West France "Departement" Breast Cancer Screening Programme.
    Dupre, P-F
    Muller, M.
    Man, Wong Chi N.
    Le Penndu, H.
    Foll, Y.
    Collet, M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (24) : 710S - 710S
  • [35] Expressiveness of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS)
    Starren, J
    Johnson, SM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1997, : 655 - 659
  • [36] Use of the probably benign (BI-RADS category 3) assessment for masses on breast MRI: Is it transferable to general clinical practice?
    Price, Elissa R.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Yitta, Silaja
    Brasic, Natasha
    Yeh, Melinda J.
    Allen, Isabel E.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (02): : 109 - 114
  • [37] Breast cancers demonstrating probably benign (BI-RADS3) features
    Chamming's, Foucauld
    Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre
    Linck, Pierre-Antoine
    Gaillard, Anne-Lise
    Deleau, Florian
    Brocard, Clementine
    Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2022, 32 (2-3) : 57 - 63
  • [38] Modified Bi-Rads Scoring of Breast Imaging Findings Improves Clinical Judgment
    Silberman, Howard
    Sheth, Pulin A.
    Parisky, Yuri R.
    Hovanessian-Larsen, Linda J.
    Sheth, Sindu
    Tripathy, Debasish
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (06): : 642 - 650
  • [39] Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast MRI: Interobserver variability in the description and assignment of BI-RADS category
    El Khoury, Mona
    Lalonde, Lucie
    David, Julie
    Labelle, Maude
    Mesurolle, Benoit
    Trop, Isabelle
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [40] Synchronous BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected by preoperative breast MRI in patients with breast cancer: may follow-up be adequate?
    Elena Martin
    Juliette Boudier
    Julia Salleron
    Philippe Henrot
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 9489 - 9498