Comparison of Lens Extraction Versus Laser Iridotomy on Anterior Segment, Choroid, and Intraocular Pressure in Primary Angle Closure Using Machine Learning

被引:7
|
作者
Kurysheva, Natalia Ivanovna [1 ,4 ]
Pomerantsev, Alexey Leonidovich [2 ]
Rodionova, Oxana Yevgenievna [2 ]
Sharova, Galina Arkadievna [3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Med & Biol Agcy Russian Federat, Ophthalmol Ctr, Moscow, Russia
[2] RAS, Fed Res Ctr Chem Phys, Moscow, Russia
[3] Ophthalmol Clin Dr Belikova, Moscow, Russia
[4] Med Biol Univ Innovat and Continuing Educ, Dept Eye Dis, AI Burnasyan Fed Med Biophys Ctr, Fed Med Biol Agcy FMBA,Dept Ophthalmol Ctr,Fed Med, 15 Gamalei St, Moscow 123098, Russia
关键词
primary angle closure; laser peripheral iridotomy; choroid; lens extraction; machine learning; data-driven soft independent modeling of class analogies; PERIPHERAL IRIDOTOMY; EARLY PHACOEMULSIFICATION; CATARACT-SURGERY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; GLAUCOMA; THICKNESS; EYES; CLASSIFICATION; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0000000000002145
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Precis:Treatment strategy of primary angle closure (PAC) is not clear due to the large number of clinical and anatomic-topographic parameters in PAC, influencing the treatment algorithm. Using the machine learning method DD-SIMCA, we justify the expediency of early lens extraction (LE) in PAC. Purpose:To compare the anatomic and functional efficacy of LE and laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in patients with PAC using Machine Learning. Materials and Methods:This prospective study included 120 patients aged 41-80 years: 60 eyes with PAC, 30 with PAC suspects, and 30 with healthy eyes (control). Thirty PAC eyes with intraocular pressure (IOP) up to 30 mm Hg were treated using LE with intraocular lens implantation and 30 eyes with LPI. All subjects underwent Swept Source optical coherence tomography. We analyzed 35 parameters of each eye including the lens vault, the choroidal thickness, the anterior chamber angle, and iris specifications such as iris curvature. Considering the correlations between them, the machine learning method DD-SIMCA 1-class classification was applied: the proximity of each sample to the target class (control) was characterized by the total distance to it. Results:After LE, IOP was significantly lower than after LPI (P=0). Every third eye with PAC after LE reached the target class: specificity according to DD-SIMCA equals 0.67. This was not observed for the eyes after LPI: specificity equals 1.0. After LE, all parameters of the anterior chamber angle did not differ from the control (all P>0.05). After LPI, there was an increase in anterior chamber depth (P=0) and a decrease in lens vault (P=0), but results comparable to the control were achieved only for iris curvature (P=1.000). Conclusion:The efficacy of LE in PAC is higher than LPI due to the better postoperative anterior chamber topography and lower IOP. This study lends further clinical and anatomic support to the emerging notion of LE as an effective treatment for PAC.
引用
收藏
页码:E43 / E55
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diurnal intraocular pressure changes in eyes affected with acute primary angle closure and fellow eyes after laser peripheral iridotomy
    Han Seok Park
    Joon Mo Kim
    Seong Hee Shim
    Hyun Tae Kim
    Jeong Hun Bae
    Chul Young Choi
    Ki Ho Park
    Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015, 59 : 318 - 324
  • [42] Novel Automated Approach to Predict the Outcome of Laser Peripheral Iridotomy for Primary Angle Closure Suspect Eyes Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography
    Victor Koh
    Issac Niwas Swamidoss
    Maria Cecilia D. Aquino
    Paul T. Chew
    Chelvin Sng
    Journal of Medical Systems, 2018, 42
  • [43] Novel Automated Approach to Predict the Outcome of Laser Peripheral Iridotomy for Primary Angle Closure Suspect Eyes Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography
    Koh, Victor
    Swamidoss, Issac Niwas
    Aquino, Maria Cecilia D.
    Chew, Paul T.
    Sng, Chelvin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (06)
  • [44] Diurnal intraocular pressure changes in eyes affected with acute primary angle closure and fellow eyes after laser peripheral iridotomy
    Park, Han Seok
    Kim, Joon Mo
    Shim, Seong Hee
    Kim, Hyun Tae
    Bae, Jeong Hun
    Choi, Chul Young
    Park, Ki Ho
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 59 (05) : 318 - 324
  • [45] Comparative study of predictors of hypotensive efficacy of laser peripheral iridotomy and lensectomy in patients with primary anterior chamber angle closure based on machine learning methods
    Kurysheva, N. I.
    Rodionova, O. Ye.
    Pomerantsev, A. L.
    Sharova, G. A.
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2023, 85
  • [46] Comparing Laser Peripheral Iridotomy to Cataract Extraction in Narrow Angle Eyes Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography
    Melese, Ephrem
    Peterson, Jeffrey R.
    Feldman, Robert M.
    Baker, Laura A.
    Bell, Nicholas P.
    Chuang, Alice Z.
    Blieden, Lauren S.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [47] Quantification of Anterior Chamber Particles Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Angle-Closure Glaucoma Patients after Laser Iridotomy
    Yoshihara, Naoya
    Terasaki, Hiroto
    Shiihara, Hideki
    Funatsu, Ryoh
    Yamashita, Takehiro
    Sakamoto, Taiji
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (15)
  • [48] Factors Affecting Intraocular Pressure after Laser Iridotomy in Fellow Eye with Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma
    Kim, Yu Min
    Kim, Dai Woo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (12): : 1493 - 1499
  • [49] Long-term effects of mild cataract extraction versus laser peripheral iridotomy on anterior chamber morphology in primary angle-closure suspect eyes
    Yan, Chenxi
    Yu, Yibo
    Wang, Wei
    Han, Ying
    Yao, Ke
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 108 (06) : 812 - 817
  • [50] Outcomes of Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Angle Closure Subgroups According to Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters
    Han, Seungbong
    Sung, Kyung Rim
    Lee, Kyoung Sub
    Hong, Ji Wook
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (10) : 6795 - 6801