Emotion regulation skills-focused interventions for chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Norman-Nott, Nell [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Hesam-Shariati, Negin [1 ,2 ]
Wewege, Michael A. [2 ,3 ]
Rizzo, Rodrigo R. N. [2 ,3 ]
Cashin, Aidan G. [2 ,3 ]
Wilks, Chelsey R. [4 ]
Quide, Yann [1 ,2 ]
Mcauley, James H. [2 ,3 ]
Gustin, Sylvia M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Sci, Sch Psychol, NeuroRecovery Res Hub, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Neurosci Res Australia, Ctr Pain IMPACT, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol Sci, St Louis, MO USA
[5] UNSW Sydney, NeuroRecovery Res Hub, Biol Sci Biolink Bldg,Level 1, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR-THERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CHRONIC MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; LOW-BACK-PAIN; COMMITMENT THERAPY; MINDFULNESS MEDITATION; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; EXPRESSION THERAPY; EXPOSURE TREATMENT; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.2268
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo investigate the effect of emotion regulation skills-focused (ERSF) interventions to reduce pain intensity and improve psychological outcomes for people with chronic pain and to narratively report on safety and intervention compliance.MethodsSix databases and four registries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 29 April 2022. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed according to the Grading, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Meta-analyses for eight studies (902 participants) assessed pain intensity (primary outcome), emotion regulation, affect, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and pain interference (secondary outcomes), at two time points when available, post-intervention (closest to intervention end) and follow-up (the first measurement after the post-intervention assessment).ResultsCompared to TAU, pain intensity improved post-intervention (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -10.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-17.55, -2.56]) and at follow-up (WMD = -11.38; 95% CI [-13.55, -9.21]). Emotion regulation improved post-intervention (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.57; 95% CI [0.14, 1.01]), and depressive symptoms improved at follow-up (SMD = -0.45; 95% CI [-0.66, -0.24]). Compared to active comparators, anxiety symptoms improved favouring the comparator post-intervention (SMD = 0.10; 95% CI [0.03, 0.18]), and compared to CBT, pain interference improved post-intervention (SMD = -0.37; 95% CI [-0.69, -0.04]). Certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate.SignificanceThe findings provide evidence that ERSF interventions reduce pain intensity for people with chronic pain compared to usual treatment. These interventions are at least as beneficial to reduce pain intensity as the current gold standard psychological intervention, CBT. However, the limited number of studies and certainty of evidence mean further high-quality RCTs are warranted. Additionally, further research is needed to identify whether ERSF interventions may be more beneficial for specific chronic pain conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1293
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Determinants of responsiveness to multidisciplinary chronic pain management interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marttinen, Maiju
    Oura, Petteri
    Huttunen, Merja
    Vartiainen, Pekka
    Paananen, Markus
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [22] Effectiveness of interdisciplinary interventions in paediatric chronic pain management: a systematic review and subset meta-analysis
    Liossi, Christina
    Johnstone, Lauren
    Lilley, Suzanne
    Caes, Line
    Williams, Glyn
    Schoth, Daniel Eric
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 123 (02) : E359 - E371
  • [23] Digital interventions for promoting exercise adherence in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bunting, J. W.
    Withers, T. M.
    Heneghan, N. R.
    Greaves, C. J.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2021, 111 : 23 - 30
  • [24] Identifying the determinants of emotion regulation choice: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Matthews, Meghann
    Webb, Thomas L.
    Shafir, Roni
    Snow, Miranda
    Sheppes, Gal
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2021, 35 (06) : 1056 - 1084
  • [25] Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stellern, Jordan
    Xiao, Ke Bin
    Grennell, Erin
    Sanches, Marcos
    Gowin, Joshua L.
    Sloan, Matthew E.
    ADDICTION, 2023, 118 (01) : 30 - 47
  • [26] Difficulties in emotion regulation in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Miola, Alessandro
    Cattarinussi, Giulia
    Antiga, Gilberto
    Caiolo, Stefano
    Solmi, Marco
    Sambataro, Fabio
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2022, 302 : 352 - 360
  • [27] Patient focused interventions and communication in the surgical clinic: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Herath, Matheesha
    Reid, Jessica L.
    Ting, Ying Yang
    Bradshaw, Emma L.
    Edwards, Suzanne
    Bruening, Martin
    Maddern, Guy J.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2023, 57
  • [28] EFFICACY OF WORKPLACE INTERVENTIONS FOR SHOULDER PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Lowry, Veronique
    Desjardins-Charbonneau, Ariel
    Roy, Jean-Sebastien
    Dionne, Clermont E.
    Fremont, Pierre
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    Desmeules, Francois
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2017, 49 (07) : 529 - 542
  • [29] Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martins Santiago, Bruno Vitor
    Garcez de Oliveira, Ana Beatriz
    Romao da Silva, Gabriel Machado
    da Silva, Maxuel de Freitas
    Bergamo, Pedro Ernandes
    Parise, Maud
    Villela, Nivaldo Ribeiro
    CLINICS, 2023, 78
  • [30] Mindfulness Meditation for Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hilton, Lara
    Hempel, Susanne
    Ewing, Brett A.
    Apaydin, Eric
    Xenakis, Lea
    Newberry, Sydne
    Colaiaco, Ben
    Maher, Alicia Ruelaz
    Shanman, Roberta M.
    Sorbero, Melony E.
    Maglione, Margaret A.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 (02) : 199 - 213