Abortion terminology preferences: a cross-sectional survey of people accessing abortion care

被引:4
|
作者
Kaller, Shelly [1 ]
Ralph, Lauren [1 ]
Wingo, Erin [1 ,2 ]
Biggs, M. Antonia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Adv New Stand Reprod Hlth, 1330 Broadway,Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Family & Community Med, 995 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
关键词
Abortion; Terminology; Preferences; Stigma; Language; Patient-centered care; STIGMA; PROVIDERS; LANGUAGE; WOMEN; RACE;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-022-02152-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundAbortion stigma likely affects the terminology abortion patients, providers and the public use or avoid using to refer to abortion care. Knowing the terminology people seeking abortion prefer could help inform the language used in clinical interactions and improve patients' experiences with abortion care. However, research in the U.S. has not examined patients' preferences in this area or whether terminology preferences vary by participant characteristics, in the way that experiences of stigma vary across different contexts and communities. This study aims to describe preferred terminology among people presenting for abortion care and to explore the pregnancy-related characteristics associated with these preferences.MethodsWe surveyed abortion patients about their experiences accessing abortion care, including preferred terms for the procedure. Respondents could mark more than one term, suggest their own term, or indicate no preference. We recruited people ages 15-45 seeking abortion from four U.S. abortion facilities located in three states (California, Illinois, and New Mexico) from January to June 2019. We used descriptive statistics and multivariable multinomial logistic regression to explore associations between respondents' pregnancy-related characteristics and their preferred terminology.ResultsAmong the 1092 people approached, 784 (77%) initiated the survey and 697 responded to the terminology preference question. Most participants (57%, n = 400) preferred only one term. Among those participants, "abortion" (43%) was most preferred, followed by "ending a pregnancy" (29%), and "pregnancy termination" (24%). In adjusted multivariable models, participants who worried "very much" that other people might find out about the abortion (29%) were significantly more likely than those who were "not at all" worried (13%) to prefer "ending a pregnancy" over having no preference for a term (adjusted relative risk ratio: 2.68, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.46-4.92).ConclusionsPeople seeking abortion have varied preferences for how they want to refer to their abortions, in particular if they anticipate abortion stigma. Findings can be useful for clinicians and researchers so that they can be responsive to people's preferences during clinical interactions and in the design and conduct of abortion research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Person-centered maternity care and satisfaction with post-abortion care: A facility-based cross-sectional survey in Northern Uganda
    Udho, Samson
    Ekung, Emmanuel
    Namutebi, Deborah Andrinar
    Aryek-kwe, Josephine
    Rubaihayo, Abraham
    Musinguzi, Marvin
    Kigongo, Eustes
    Penduka, Annaloice
    Uwera, Yvonne Delphine Nsaba
    Opio, Bosco
    Ogwal-Okeng, Jasper
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2025, 21
  • [42] Modernization and future care preferences: a cross-sectional survey of Arab Israeli caregivers
    Khalaila, Rabia
    Litwin, Howard
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2011, 67 (07) : 1614 - 1624
  • [43] Abortion method preference among people presenting for abortion care
    Wingo, Erin
    Ralph, Lauren J.
    Kaller, Shelly
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    CONTRACEPTION, 2021, 103 (04) : 269 - 275
  • [44] Unintended pregnancy, induced abortion and abortion care-seeking experiences among adolescents in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a cross-sectional study
    Fatusi, Adesegun
    Riley, Taylor
    Kayembe, Patrick K.
    Mabika, Crispin
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [45] Barriers to Accessing Surgical Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey Conducted at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan
    Samad, Lubna
    Jawed, Fayez
    Sajun, Sana Zehra
    Arshad, Mohammad Hussham
    Baig-Ansari, Naila
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (10) : 2313 - 2321
  • [46] Barriers to Accessing Surgical Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey Conducted at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan
    Lubna Samad
    Fayez Jawed
    Sana Zehra Sajun
    Mohammad Hussham Arshad
    Naila Baig-Ansari
    World Journal of Surgery, 2013, 37 : 2313 - 2321
  • [47] SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION AND INDUCED-ABORTION - AN ADJUSTMENT FOR THE PRESENCE OF INDUCED-ABORTION WHEN ESTIMATING THE RATE OF SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION FROM CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES
    SUSSER, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1983, 117 (03) : 305 - 308
  • [48] Is Repeat Abortion a Public Health Problem among Chinese Adolescents? A Cross-Sectional Survey in 30 Provinces
    Liu, Jinlin
    Wu, Shangchun
    Xu, Jialin
    Temmerman, Marleen
    Zhang, Wei-Hong
    Li, Jian
    Xiong, Cheng-Liang
    Liu, Jun-Li
    Meng, Qing-Long
    Che, Yan
    Zhao, Wei-Li
    Zhang, Hui-Ping
    Qian, Xu
    Jiang, Hong
    Liang, Ji
    Wu, Shangchun
    Zhou, Yan
    Liu, Qing
    Hu, Lina
    Dong, Xiao-Jing
    Jiang, Yi
    Liu, Shuai-Bei
    Gan, Xiao-Ling
    Olsen, Jorn
    Li, Jiong
    Tolhurst, Rachel
    Esther, Dusabe-Richards
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (05)
  • [49] Women's knowledge and attitudes surrounding abortion in Zambia: a cross-sectional survey across three provinces
    Cresswell, Jenny A.
    Schroeder, Rosalyn
    Dennis, Mardieh
    Owolabi, Onikepe
    Vwalika, Bellington
    Musheke, Maurice
    Campbell, Oona
    Filippi, Veronique
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (03):
  • [50] Medical students' attitudes and perceptions on abortion: a cross-sectional survey among medical interns in Maharastra, India
    Sjostrom, Susanne
    Essen, Birgitta
    Syden, Filip
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    Klingberg-Allvin, Marie
    CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 90 (01) : 42 - 46