Prognostic utility of biopsy-based PTEN and ERG status on biochemical progression and overall survival after SBRT for localized prostate cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Repka, Michael C. [1 ]
Sholklapper, Tamir [2 ]
Zwart, Alan L. [2 ]
Danner, Malika [2 ]
Ayoob, Marilyn [2 ]
Yung, Thomas [2 ]
Lei, Siyuan [2 ]
Collins, Brian T. [3 ]
Kumar, Deepak [4 ]
Suy, Simeng [2 ]
Hankins, Ryan A. [5 ]
Kishan, Amar U. [6 ]
Collins, Sean P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina UNC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Med, Washington, DC USA
[3] Tampa Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[4] North Carolina Cent Univ, Julius Chambers Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[5] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Washington, DC USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles UCLA, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
prostate cancer; PTEN; ERG; SBRT; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1381134
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction/background Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) genomic deletions and transmembrane protease, serine 2/v-ets avian erthyroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (ERG) rearrangements are two of the most common genetic abnormalities associated with prostate cancer. Prior studies have demonstrated these alterations portend worse clinical outcomes. Our objective is to evaluate the impact of biopsy-determined PTEN losses and TMPRSS2-ERG fusion on biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients who receive SBRT for localized prostate cancer. Methods/materials Patients received SBRT for localized prostate cancer on a prospective quality-of-life (QoL) and cancer outcomes study. For each patient, the single biopsy core with the highest grade/volume of cancer was evaluated for PTEN and ERG abnormalities. Differences in baseline patient and disease characteristics between groups were analyzed using ANOVA for age and chi 2 for categorical groupings. bPFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan Meier (KM) method with Log-Rank test comparison between groups. Predictors of bPFS and OS were identified using the Cox proportional hazards method. For all analyses, p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Ninety-nine consecutive patients were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 72 months. A statistically significant improvement in bPFS (p = 0.018) was observed for wild type ERG patients with an estimated 5-year bPFS of 94.1% vs. 72.4%. Regarding PTEN mutational status, significant improvements in were observed in both bPFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p < 0.001), with estimated 5-year bPFS rates of 91.0% vs. 67.9% and 5-year OS rates of 96.4% vs. 79.4%. When including both ERG and PTEN mutational status in the analysis, there were statistically significant differences in both bPFS (p = 0.011) and OS (p < 0.001). The estimated 5-year bPFS rates were 100%, 76.6%, 72.9%, and 63.8% for patients with ERG+/PTEN+, ERG-/PTEN+, ERG+/PTEN-, and ERG-/PTEN- phenotypes respectively. The estimated 5-year OS rates were 93.9%, 100%, 80.0%, and 78.7% for patients with ERG+/PTEN+, ERG-/PTEN+, ERG+/PTEN-, and ERG-/PTEN- phenotypes respectively. Conclusion ERG rearrangements and PTEN deletions detected on biopsy samples are associated with poorer oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT and merit further study in a dedicated prospective trial.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of biochemical progression rates after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Bulent Akduman
    E David Crawford
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2006, 3 : 78 - 79
  • [22] Implications of a Negative Confirmatory Biopsy Among Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Along with PTEN/ERG as a Predictor of Pathologic Progression
    Prasad, Anil
    Lin, Kirk
    Prasad, Ashish
    Bartlett, Zane
    Belkoff, Kenneth
    Page, Jay
    Levine, Michael
    Shah, Rajal
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2021, 34 (SUPPL 2) : 597 - 597
  • [23] Implications of a Negative Confirmatory Biopsy Among Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Along with PTEN/ERG as a Predictor of Pathologic Progression
    Prasad, Anil
    Lin, Kirk
    Prasad, Ashish
    Bartlett, Zane
    Belkoff, Kenneth
    Page, Jay
    Levine, Michael
    Shah, Rajal
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2021, 101 (SUPPL 1) : 597 - 597
  • [24] Pretreatment PSA levels as predictors of overall survival after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Kupelian, PA
    Reddy, CA
    Reuther, AM
    Klein, EA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 275 - 275
  • [25] βIII-Tubulin Overexpression Is an Independent Predictor of Prostate Cancer Progression Tightly Linked to ERG Fusion Status and PTEN Deletion
    Tsourlakis, Maria C.
    Weigand, Philipp
    Grupp, Katharina
    Kluth, Martina
    Steurer, Stefan
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Salomon, Georg
    Steuber, Thomas
    Wilczak, Waldemar
    Sirma, Hueseyin
    Simon, Ronald
    Sauter, Guido
    Minner, Sarah
    Quaas, Alexander
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2014, 184 (03): : 609 - 617
  • [26] Biochemical Recurrence is Not a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Localized Prostate Cancer: Data from 2 Phase Ill Trials
    Nabid, A.
    Carrier, N.
    Vigneault, E.
    Martin, A. G.
    Nguyen, T. V.
    Bahary, J. P.
    Vavassis, P.
    Bahoric, B.
    Brassard, M. A.
    Vass, S. T., Jr.
    Archambault, R.
    Vincent, F.
    Bettahar, R.
    Duclos, M.
    Wilke, D. R.
    Souhami, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 120 (02): : E566 - E566
  • [27] ERG immunohistochemistry is not predictive for PSA recurrence, local recurrence or overall survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Hoogland, A. Marije
    Jenster, Guido
    van Weerden, Wytske M.
    Trapman, Jan
    van der Kwast, Theo
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schroeder, Fritz H.
    Wildhagen, Mark F.
    van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 (03) : 471 - 479
  • [28] ERG immunohistochemistry is not predictive for PSA recurrence, local recurrence or overall survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Hoogland, A. M.
    Jenster, G.
    Van Weerden, W. M.
    Trapman, J.
    Van der Kwast, T.
    Roobol, M. J.
    Schroder, F. H.
    Wildhagen, M. F.
    Van Leenders, G. J. L. H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E425 - U932
  • [29] Prognostic classifier for predicting biochemical recurrence in localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Carrion, Albert
    Ingelmo-Torres, Mercedes
    Lozano, Juan Jose
    Montalbo, Ruth
    D'Anna, Maurizio
    Mercader, Claudia
    Velez, Elena
    Ribal, Maria Jose
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    Mengual, Lourdes
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (08) : 493.e17 - 493.e25
  • [30] IMPACT OF FAMILIAL STATUS AND RISK GROUP CLASSIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER ON PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Heck, Matthias
    Kron, Martina
    Gschwend, Juergen
    Herkommer, Kathleen
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E118 - E118