The argument for adopting a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct

被引：2
|
作者：
Siegerink, B. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Pet, L. A. [1 ]
Rosendaal, F. R. [1 ,3 ]
Erkens, M. Y. H. G. [3 ]
机构：
[1] LUMC, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] LUMC, Directorate Res Policy, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, C-7-P, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
来源：
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY | 2023年
关键词：
Research misconduct; research ethics; policy development; codes of conduct in science;
D O I：
10.1080/08989621.2023.2172678
中图分类号：
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号：
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要：
In this paper we will describe the arguments to adopt a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct, we argue that this will increase the principle of legal certainty, improve procedures, and will promote scientific integrity in other, indirect ways. With the platform that we are currently setting up in the Netherlands as a motivating example, we finally also describe the prerequisites for such a platform, its contents as well as its value in the international context.
引用
收藏
页数：12
相关论文
共 50 条
12345