High Level Sacral Bone Resection for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Takiguchi, Nobuo [1 ]
Uemura, Mamoru [1 ,6 ]
Kitakaze, Masatoshi [2 ]
Paku, Masakatsu [3 ]
Takeda, Mitsunobu [1 ]
Sekido, Yuki [1 ]
Hata, Tsuyoshi [1 ]
Hamabe, Atsushi [1 ]
Ogino, Takayuki [1 ]
Miyoshi, Norikatsu [1 ]
Tei, Mitsuyoshi [4 ]
Kagawa, Yoshinori [5 ]
Yamamoto, Hirofumi [1 ]
Doki, Yuichiro [1 ]
Eguchi, Hidetoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Osaka, Japan
[3] Hoshigaoka Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[4] Osaka Rosai Hosp, Dept Surg, Sakai, Japan
[5] Osaka Gen Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Osaka, Japan
[6] 2-2 E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
Rectal cancer; local recurrence; high sacrectomy; complications; local re-recurrence-free survival rate; EN-BLOC RESECTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PELVIC EXENTERATION; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; CLASSIFICATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.21873/anticanres.16705
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Aim: Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) involving the upper sacrum is generally considered a contraindication for curative surgery. In the surgical management of LRRC, sacrectomy is frequently performed to secure clear resection margins. Nonetheless, the indications for high sacrectomy remain controversial due to potential postoperative complications, questions about radicality, and the increased complexity of the operation. Furthermore, comprehensive studies addressing this issue are notably absent. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and surgical prognosis in high sacrectomy for LRRC. Patients and Methods: All patients with LRRC who required concomitant sacrectomy, but did not include the inferior margin of the second sacral vertebra, between 2003 and 2014, were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Eight patients with a median age of 59 years were included in this study. The proximal resection line for sacral bone resection was the central part of the S1 vertebra in one patient, lower edge of the S1 vertebra in six patients, and central part of the S2 vertebra in one patient. Negative margin resection was achieved in five out of the eight patients. The median operative time was 922 min, and the median operative blood loss volume was 6,370 ml. Major complications included pelvic abscess (n=5), ileus (n=1), and pulmonary vein embolism (n=1), none of which proved fatal during the postoperative period. Both the 5-year local re-recurrence-free survival rate and the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate were 50% (4/8). Conclusion: High sacrectomy is safe and feasible to achieve negative margins in patients with LRRC.
引用
收藏
页码:5061 / 5066
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Results of an Aggressive Approach to Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer
    Bryan J. Wells
    Peter Stotland
    Michael A. Ko
    Wigdan Al-Sukhni
    Jay Wunder
    Peter Ferguson
    Joan Lipa
    Linda Last
    Andrew J. Smith
    Carol J. Swallow
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2007, 14
  • [22] Outcome after curative resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Bedrosian, I
    Giacco, G
    Pederson, L
    Rodriguez-Bigas, M
    Feig, B
    Hunt, KK
    Ellis, L
    Curley, SA
    Vauthey, JN
    Delclos, M
    Crane, CH
    Janjan, N
    Skibber, JM
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (02) : 175 - 182
  • [23] Abdominosacral resection for primary irresectable and locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Mannaerts, GHH
    Rutten, HJT
    Martijn, H
    Groen, GJ
    Hanssens, PEJ
    Wiggers, T
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (06) : 806 - 814
  • [24] Results of an aggressive approach to resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Wells, Bryan J.
    Stotland, Peter
    Ko, Michael A.
    Al-Sukhni, Wigdan
    Wunder, Jay
    Ferguson, Peter
    Lipa, Joan
    Last, Linda
    Smith, Andrew J.
    Swallow, Carol J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (02) : 390 - 395
  • [25] Extended radical resection: The choice for locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    Byrne, Christopher M.
    Lee, Peter
    Dobbs, Bruce
    Tilney, Henry
    Solomon, Michael J.
    Mackay, John
    Frizelle, Frank
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (03) : 284 - 291
  • [26] The importance of the minimal resection margin in locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Alberda, W. J.
    Verhoef, C.
    Nuyttens, J. J.
    Rothbarth, J.
    Burger, J. W. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S537 - S537
  • [27] Outcome after curative resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Bedrosian, I
    Giacco, G
    Pederson, L
    Rodriguez-Bigas, M
    Feig, B
    Hunt, K
    Ellis, L
    Curley, S
    Vauthey, JN
    Skibber, J
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (02) : S108 - S108
  • [28] Extended Pelvic and Sacral Resection in the Surgical Management of Recurrent Low Rectal Cancer
    Gawad, W. S.
    Khafagy, M. M.
    Gameil, M. A.
    Mokhtar, N. M.
    Mansour, O. M.
    Lotayeif, M. M.
    Negm, M. M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 : S86 - S86
  • [29] Pathological determinants of outcome following resection of locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Gould, Laura E.
    Pring, Edward T.
    Moorghen, Morgan
    Burns, Elaine M.
    Antoniou, Anthony
    Steele, Colin W.
    Roxburgh, Campbell SD.
    Jenkins, John T.
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (11):
  • [30] Results of an aggressive approach to resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC)
    Wells, BJ
    Stotland, P
    Ko, MA
    Wunder, J
    Last, LD
    Smith, AJ
    Swallow, CJ
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) : 80 - 80