Review of welding fume emission factor development

被引:3
|
作者
Quecke, Emily [1 ]
Quemerais, Bernadette [2 ,3 ]
Hashisho, Zaher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6R 2W2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB T6R 2R3, Canada
[3] 173B Heritage Med Res Ctr,11207-87 Ave NW E, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
关键词
emission factors; metalloids; metals; occupational health; welding fumes; STEEL; INHALATION; REDUCTION; FINE;
D O I
10.1093/annweh/wxad024
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The fumes created from welding activities present a unique occupational hazard. Due to the complex processes which govern fume formation, the characterization of welding fumes is difficult. Emission factors (EFs) are one method to characterize fume formation from different processes and scenarios. This paper reviews the development of EFs and similar metrics both historic research which contributed to the US EPAs AP-42 summary of welding emission factors released in 1995, and more recent research initiatives. Through a critical analysis of what research has been done in this area and the strength of the emission factors developed, this paper proposes a set of recommendations for future research. Research on emission factors for gas metal arc welding (GMAW) is the most complete amongst the different types of electric arc welding. Despite it being generally known that flux core arc welding (FCAW) creates significant fume emissions compared to some of the other processes few studies have looked at FCAW since the AP-42. Shielded metal arc welding is also under-researched particularly in terms of metal-specific emission factors. The influence of different welding activity parameters such as welding location, speed or current is well defined for GMAW but requires more attention for other welding processes. Further effort towards compiling and comparing available emission factor data of quality, evaluating the available data statistically and organizing this data in a practically useful way is required. The availability of reliable emission factors will allow the development or improvement of exposure modelling tools that would be very useful for exposure assessment when monitoring is not practical.s
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 693
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Breathing zone sampling of welding fume
    Chung, K.Y.K.
    Carter, G.J.
    Journal of Aerosol Science, 1996, 27 (Suppl 1):
  • [32] Fume generation and control in GMA welding
    Norrish, J
    TRENDS IN WELDING RESEARCH, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 349 - 356
  • [33] ANALYSIS OF CHROMIUM IN WELDING FUME - REPLY
    MORETON, J
    BETTELLEY, J
    MATHERS, H
    SVENSSON, L
    NICHOLLS, A
    RATCLIFFE, D
    PERRY, R
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1984, 28 (02): : 276 - 277
  • [34] Welding fume main compounds and structure
    Floros, Nicolas
    WELDING IN THE WORLD, 2018, 62 (02) : 311 - 316
  • [35] FUME HAZARDS IN WELDING, BRAZING AND SOLDERING
    MORETON, J
    METAL CONSTRUCTION, 1977, 9 (01): : 33 - 34
  • [36] WELDING FUME - ITS SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
    不详
    MACHINERY AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 1975, 126 (3259): : 473 - 473
  • [37] Formation of primary particles in welding fume
    Vishnyakov, V.I. (drvishnyakov@mail.ru), 1600, Elsevier Ltd (58):
  • [38] Selecting Fume Collectors for Welding Applications
    Schreier, Greg
    WELDING JOURNAL, 2012, 91 (12) : 73 - 76
  • [39] CONTROLLING WELDING FUME - A DESIGN APPROACH
    REDING, L
    WELDING JOURNAL, 1992, 71 (09) : 61 - 64
  • [40] Cognitive Symptoms and Welding Fume Exposure
    Ross, John A. S.
    Macdiarmid, Jennifer I.
    Semple, Sean
    Watt, Stephen J.
    Moir, Gill
    Henderson, George
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2013, 57 (01): : 26 - 33