2D and 3D numerical simulations of dam-break flow problem with RANS, DES, and LES

被引:18
|
作者
Simsek, Oguz [1 ]
Islek, Huseyin [1 ]
机构
[1] Harran Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-63050 Sanliurfa, Turkiye
关键词
Dam-break; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Free surface profile; DES; LES; TURBULENCE MODELS; OBSTACLE; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114298
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
In this study, dam-break flows occurring on different downstream/upstream water depth ratios (alpha = 0, 0.1, and 0.4) and different obstacle shapes are numerically modeled in 2D and 3D. The Finite Volume Method (FVM) is used in the numerical solution of the basic equations governing the propagation wave formed as a result of the dam-break, and the interface of water with air is calculated by the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method. In modeling turbulence stresses, four turbulence models particularly successful in curvilinear trajectories and high strain flows, namely the Re-normalization Group (RNG), Shear Stress Model (SST), Detached Eddy Simulation (DES), are employed for the 2D simulation, and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) for the 3D simulation. The numerical results are compared against the previous experimental results and the performance of the turbulence models is evaluated according to the Mean Absolute Relative Error (MARE) criteria. For the 2D analysis, it has been determined that the DES is more successful for alpha = 0, 0.1, and 0.4, whereas the SST is more successful for triangular and trapezoidal obstacles in the downstream region than other turbulence models. Comparing the 2D and 3D results, the 3D LES model is expected to be more compatible with the experimental water surface profiles for all conditions among the models used in the study. It has been concluded that turbulence models, in which the strain tensor is considered, are successful in modeling the propagation wave formed as a result of a dam -break.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dam-break flows: Acquisition of experimental data through an imaging technique and 2D numerical modeling
    Aureli, Francesca
    Maranzoni, Andrea
    Mignosa, Paolo
    Ziveri, Chiara
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (08) : 1089 - 1101
  • [22] A Numerical Validation of 3D Experimental Dam-Break Wave Interaction with a Sharp Obstacle Using DualSPHysics
    Capasso, Salvatore
    Tagliafierro, Bonaventura
    Guzel, Hasan
    Yilmaz, Ada
    Dal, Kaan
    Kocaman, Selahattin
    Viccione, Giacomo
    Evangelista, Stefania
    WATER, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [23] Benchmark study of 2D and 3D VOF simulations of a simplex nozzle using a hybrid RANS-LES approach
    Bal, Mustafa
    Kayansalcik, Gokhan
    Ertunc, Ozgur
    Boke, Yakup Erhan
    FUEL, 2022, 319
  • [24] Benchmark study of 2D and 3D VOF simulations of a simplex nozzle using a hybrid RANS-LES approach
    Bal, Mustafa
    Kayansalçik, Gökhan
    Ertunç, Özgür
    Erhan Böke, Yakup
    Fuel, 2022, 319
  • [25] Dam-break hazard assessment with geomorphic flow computation, using WOLF 2D hydrodynamic software
    Dewals, B
    Archambeau, P
    Erpicum, S
    Mouzelard, T
    Pirotton, M
    RISK ANALYSIS III, 2002, 5 : 59 - 68
  • [26] Numerical Simulations of Dam-break Flow on Complicated Terrain Using VOF Method
    Liu Aiming
    Xiong Aokui
    Liu Xueyan
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL AND AUTOMATION ENGINEERING (MAEE 2013), 2013, : 229 - 232
  • [27] 2-D dam-break wave simulation
    Wang, DG
    Cheng, L
    Wang, YC
    ADVANCES IN HYDRAULICS AND WATER ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 356 - 359
  • [28] Numerical modelling of 2-dimensional dam-break flow
    Laasonen, JP
    HYDROPOWER '97, 1997, : 459 - 465
  • [29] Predicting near-field dam-break flow and impact force using a 3D model
    Yang, Chen
    Lin, Binliang
    Jiang, Chunbo
    Liu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (06) : 784 - 792
  • [30] A 3D smoothed particle hydrodynamics model for erosional dam-break floods
    Amicarelli, Andrea
    Kocak, Bozhana
    Sibilla, Stefano
    Grabe, Juergen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2017, 31 (10) : 413 - 434