Influence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by Surgical Versus Conservative Management in Adult Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Peng, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Xiao-Bo [1 ]
Zhao, Jin-Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Trauma Orthoped & Hand Surg, Nanning 530021, Peoples R China
[2] Minzu Hosp Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg, Nanning 530000, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2023年 / 59卷 / 06期
关键词
adult ankle fractures; surgical treatment; conservative treatment; joint function and physical health; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; MULTICENTER; FIXATION;
D O I
10.3390/medicina59061152
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: This meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane-Library databases were searched to retrieve prospective randomized-controlled studies that compared the efficacy of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. The meta package in R language was used to organize and analyze the obtained data. Results: A total of eight studies involving 2081 patients was considered eligible, including 1029 patients receiving surgical treatment and 1052 receiving conservative treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, and the registration number is CRD42018520164. Olerud and Molander ankle-fracture scores (OMAS) and the health survey 12-item Short-Form (SF-12) were used as main outcome indicators, and the follow-up outcomes were grouped according to the follow-up time. Meta-analysis results showed significantly higher OMAS scores in patients receiving surgical treatment than those with conservative treatment at six months (MD = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.07; 1.93) and over 24 months (MD = 3.10, 95% CI: 2.46; 3.74), while this statistical significance was absent at 12-24 months (MD = 0.08, 95% CI: -5.80; 5.96). At six months and 12 months after treatment, patients receiving surgical treatment exhibited significantly higher SF12-physical results than those receiving conservative treatment (MD = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.89; 2.91). The MD of SF12-mental data at six months after meta-analysis was -0.81 (95% CI: -1.22; 0.39), and the MD of SF12-mental data at 12+ months was -0.81 (95% CI: -1.22; 0.39). There was no significant difference in SF12-mental results between the two treatment methods after six months, but after 12 months, the SF12-mental results of patients receiving surgical treatment were significantly lower than those of conservative treatment. Conclusions: In the treatment of adult ankle fractures, surgical treatment is more efficacious than conservative treatment in improving early and long-term joint function and physical health of patients, but it is associated with long-term adverse mental health.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic review of the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for rheumatoid arthritis in the foot and ankle
    Belen Ortega-Avila, Ana
    Ramos-Petersen, Laura
    Cervera-Garvi, Pablo
    Nester, Christopher J.
    Miguel Morales-Asencio, Jose
    Gijon-Nogueron, Gabriel
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 33 (11) : 1788 - 1799
  • [42] A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician-reported versus patient-reported outcomes of radiation dermatitis
    Lam, Emily
    Yee, Caitlin
    Wong, Gina
    Popovic, Marko
    Drost, Leah
    Pon, Kucy
    Vesprini, Danny
    Lam, Henry
    Aljabri, Saleh
    Soliman, Hany
    DeAngelis, Carlo
    Chow, Edward
    BREAST, 2020, 50 : 125 - 134
  • [43] Clinical outcome analysis for surgical fixation versus conservative treatment on rib fractures: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis
    Penglong Zhao
    Qiyue Ge
    Haotian Zheng
    Jing Luo
    Xiaobin Song
    Liwen Hu
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 20 (1)
  • [44] A Systematic Review Investigating the Effectiveness of Surgical Versus Conservative Management of Unstable Ankle Fractures in Adults
    Elgayar, Lugman
    Arnall, Frances
    Barrie, Jim
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2019, 58 (05): : 933 - 937
  • [45] Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Surgical Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review
    Claessens, Anouk A. E.
    van Alphen, Tert C.
    Lapid, Oren
    Hoogbergen, Maarten M.
    Ovadja, Zachri N.
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2022, 48 (04) : 411 - 417
  • [46] Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer
    Straatman, J.
    Joosten, P. J. M.
    Terwee, C. B.
    Cuesta, M. A.
    Jansma, E. P.
    van der Peet, D. L.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2016, 29 (07) : 760 - 772
  • [47] Patient-reported outcome measures for adult chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and quality assessment
    Rudmik, Luke
    Hopkins, Claire
    Peters, Anju
    Smith, Timothy L.
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    Soler, Zachary M.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 136 (06) : 1532 - +
  • [48] Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Graft-versus-Host Disease
    Kilgour, James M.
    Wali, Gorav
    Gibbons, Elizabeth
    Scherwath, Angela
    Badiella, Anna Barata
    Peniket, Andy
    Schoemans, Helene
    Matin, Rubeta N.
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 26 (05) : E113 - E127
  • [49] Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Barello, Serena
    Anderson, Gloria
    Bosio, Caterina
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    Leo, Donato G.
    Lobban, Trudie C. A.
    Trevisan, Caterina
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [50] Patient-reported outcome measures in functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and COSMIN analysis
    Xinai Wang
    Yan Fei
    Wenjing Li
    Hao Liu
    Hongling Xiao
    Yaxuan Wu
    Chenqi Wang
    BMC Gastroenterology, 23