Impact of the family doctor system on the continuity of care for diabetics in urban China: a difference-in-difference analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Liu, Xinyi [1 ]
Zhang, Luying [1 ]
Chen, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
health policy; health services administration & management; primary care; general medicine (see internal medicine); OF-CARE; COSTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065612
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesOur study aimed to examine whether the family doctor system can improve continuity of care for patients with diabetes.DesignRegistry-based, population-level longitudinal cohort study.SettingLinked data from the administrative Health Information System and the Health Insurance Claim Databases in a sample city in eastern China.Participants30 451 insured patients who were diagnosed with diabetes before January 2015 in the sample city, with >= 2 outpatient visits per year during 2014-2017. Diabetics in the intervention group had been registered with family doctor teams from 2015 to 2017, while those who had not registered were taken as the control group.InterventionsThe family doctor system was established in China mainly to strengthen primary care and rebuild referral systems. Residents were encouraged to register with family doctors to obtain continuous health management especially for chronic disease management.Outcome measuresContinuity of care was measured by the Continuity of Care Index (COCI), Usual Provider Continuity Score (UPCS) and Sequential Continuity of Care Index (SECON) in 2014-2017.ResultsCOCI, UPCS and SECON of all diabetics in this study increased between 2014 and 2017. A difference-in-difference approach was applied to measure the net effect of the family doctor system on continuity of care. Our model controlled for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, and severity of disease at baseline. Compared with the control group, diabetics registered with family doctors obtained an average 0.019 increase in COCI (SE 0.002) (p<0.01), a 0.016 increase in UPCS (SE 0.002) (p<0.01) and a 0.018 increase in SECON (SE 0.002) (p<0.01).ConclusionThis study provides evidence that the family doctor system can effectively improve continuity of care for patients with diabetes, which has substantial policy implications for further primary care reform in China.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of global budget on cost control and readmission in rural China: a difference-in-difference analysis
    He, Ruibo
    Miao, Yudong
    Ye, Ting
    Zhang, Yan
    Tang, Wenxi
    Li, Zhong
    Zhang, Liang
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (09) : 903 - 910
  • [22] Evaluating the Impact of Blended Learning: a Mixed-Methods Study with Difference-in-Difference Analysis
    Fazal, Minaz
    Panzano, Bryan
    Luk, Kristy
    TECHTRENDS, 2020, 64 (01) : 70 - 78
  • [23] The impact of increasing expenditure on National Essential Public Health Services on the medical costs of hypertension in China: A difference-in-difference analysis
    Xue, Long
    Sui, Mengyun
    He, YunZhen
    Li, Hongzheng
    Ying, Xiaohua
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (11):
  • [24] Impact of Medicaid expansion on postoperative mortality in women with gynecologic cancer: a difference-in-difference analysis
    Huepenbecker, Sarah
    Sun, Charlotte
    Fu, Shuangshuang
    Zhao, Hui
    Primm, Kristin
    Giordano, Sharon
    Meyer, Larissa
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 166 : S16 - S16
  • [25] Impact of the family doctor system on medication adherence among type 2 diabetes patients in China: a difference-in-differences analysis
    Xichen Tong
    Haiyan Zou
    Luying Zhang
    Wen Chen
    BMC Public Health, 25 (1)
  • [26] Impacts of high-speed rail on urban smog pollution in China: A spatial difference-in-difference approach
    Fang, Jing
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 777
  • [27] Evaluating the Impact of Blended Learning: a Mixed-Methods Study with Difference-in-Difference Analysis
    Minaz Fazal
    Bryan Panzano
    Kristy Luk
    TechTrends, 2020, 64 : 70 - 78
  • [28] Changes in the perceived quality of primary care in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China: a difference-in-difference analysis (vol 93, pg 407, 2015)
    Wei, X. L.
    Li, H. T.
    Yang, N.
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2015, 93 (08) : 588 - 588
  • [29] Unraveling the Financial Impact of COVID-19 on the Tourism Industry through a Difference-In-Difference Analysis
    Strouhal, Jiri
    Dey, Sandeep Kumar
    Kloudova, Jitka
    Hoang, Sinh Duc
    Tuckova, Zuzana
    JOURNAL OF TOURISM AND SERVICES, 2024, 15 (28): : 143 - 160
  • [30] Impact of Turkish Policy Reform on Labor Force Status of Disabled Males: A Difference-in-Difference Analysis
    Duzgun-Oncel, Burcu
    Karaoglan, Deniz
    PANOECONOMICUS, 2022, 69 (04) : 635 - 650