Impact of the family doctor system on the continuity of care for diabetics in urban China: a difference-in-difference analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Liu, Xinyi [1 ]
Zhang, Luying [1 ]
Chen, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
health policy; health services administration & management; primary care; general medicine (see internal medicine); OF-CARE; COSTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065612
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesOur study aimed to examine whether the family doctor system can improve continuity of care for patients with diabetes.DesignRegistry-based, population-level longitudinal cohort study.SettingLinked data from the administrative Health Information System and the Health Insurance Claim Databases in a sample city in eastern China.Participants30 451 insured patients who were diagnosed with diabetes before January 2015 in the sample city, with >= 2 outpatient visits per year during 2014-2017. Diabetics in the intervention group had been registered with family doctor teams from 2015 to 2017, while those who had not registered were taken as the control group.InterventionsThe family doctor system was established in China mainly to strengthen primary care and rebuild referral systems. Residents were encouraged to register with family doctors to obtain continuous health management especially for chronic disease management.Outcome measuresContinuity of care was measured by the Continuity of Care Index (COCI), Usual Provider Continuity Score (UPCS) and Sequential Continuity of Care Index (SECON) in 2014-2017.ResultsCOCI, UPCS and SECON of all diabetics in this study increased between 2014 and 2017. A difference-in-difference approach was applied to measure the net effect of the family doctor system on continuity of care. Our model controlled for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, and severity of disease at baseline. Compared with the control group, diabetics registered with family doctors obtained an average 0.019 increase in COCI (SE 0.002) (p<0.01), a 0.016 increase in UPCS (SE 0.002) (p<0.01) and a 0.018 increase in SECON (SE 0.002) (p<0.01).ConclusionThis study provides evidence that the family doctor system can effectively improve continuity of care for patients with diabetes, which has substantial policy implications for further primary care reform in China.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Medicaid expansion on pancreatic cancer care: A difference-in-difference analysis.
    Hamad, Ahmad
    Eskander, Mariam
    Li, Yaming
    Bhattacharyya, Oindrila
    Fisher, James L.
    Oppong, Bridget A.
    Obeng-Gyasi, Samilia
    Tsung, Allan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [2] Changes in the perceived quality of primary care in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China: a difference-in-difference analysis
    Wei, Xiaolin
    Li, Haitao
    Yang, Nan
    Wong, Samuel Y. S.
    Chong, Marc C. S.
    Shi, Leiyu
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Xu, Jianguang
    Zhang, Dan
    Tang, Jinling
    Li, Donald K. T.
    Meng, Qingyue
    Griffiths, Sian M.
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2015, 93 (06) : 407 - 416
  • [3] Access to food outlets and children's nutritional intake in urban China: a difference-in-difference analysis
    Wang, Rui
    Shi, Lu
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2012, 38
  • [4] Access to food outlets and children's nutritional intake in urban China: a difference-in-difference analysis
    Rui Wang
    Lu Shi
    Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 38
  • [5] Impact of an anticipatory care planning intervention on unscheduled acute hospital care using difference-in-difference analysis
    Leckcivilize, Attakrit
    McNamee, Paul
    Cooper, Christopher
    Steel, Robby
    BMJ HEALTH & CARE INFORMATICS, 2021, 28 (01)
  • [6] A Bayesian Difference-in-Difference Framework for the Impact of Primary Care Redesign on Diabetes Outcomes
    Normington, James
    Lock, Eric
    Carlin, Caroline
    Peterson, Kevin
    Carlin, Bradley
    STATISTICS AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2019, 6 (01): : 55 - 66
  • [7] The impact of a pilot reform on the diagnosis-related-groups payment system in China: a difference-in-difference study
    Jian, Weiyan
    Lu, Ming
    Chan, Kit Yee
    Poon, Adrienne N.
    Han, Wei
    Hu, Mu
    Yip, Winnie
    LANCET, 2015, 386 : 26 - 26
  • [8] Impact of Medicaid expansion on women with gynecologic cancer: a difference-in-difference analysis
    Albright, Benjamin B.
    Nasioudis, Dimitrios
    Craig, Stuart
    Moss, Haley A.
    Latif, Nawar A.
    Ko, Emily M.
    Haggerty, Ashley F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : 195.e1 - 195.e17
  • [9] THE IMPACT OF CANNABIS LEGALIZATION ON OPIOIDS IN PATIENTS WITH IBD: A DIFFERENCE-IN-DIFFERENCE ANALYSIS
    Noureldin, Mohamed
    Berinstein, Jeffrey
    Scott, Frank I.
    Higgins, Peter D.
    Stidham, Ryan
    Cohen-Mekelburg, Shirley
    Hou, Jason K.
    Waljee, Akbar K.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S231 - S232
  • [10] The Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Students' Behavioral Disorder: A Difference-in-Difference Analysis
    Tian, Xian-Liang
    Guan, Xian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 12 (05): : 5540 - 5560