Breast Reconstruction Complications After Postmastectomy Proton Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Berlin, Eva [1 ]
Yegya-Raman, Nikhil [1 ]
Hollawell, Casey [1 ]
Haertter, Allison [1 ]
Fosnot, Joshua [2 ]
Rhodes, Sylvia [1 ]
Seol, Seung Won [1 ]
Gentile, Michelle [1 ]
Li, Taoran [1 ]
Freedman, Gary M. [1 ]
Taunk, Neil K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; MASTECTOMY; TRENDS; WOMEN; HEART; RISK; PREDICTORS; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2023.101385
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Our purpose was to report complications requiring surgical intervention among patients treated with postmastectomy proton radiation therapy (PMPRT) for breast cancer in the setting of breast reconstruction (BR). Methods and Materials: Patients enrolled on a prospective proton registry who underwent BR with immediate autologous flap, tissue expander (TE), or implant in place during PMPRT (50/50.4 Gy +/- chest wall boost) were eligible. Major reconstruction complication (MRC) was defined as a complication requiring surgical intervention. Absolute reconstruction failure was an MRC requiring surgical removal of BR. A routine revision (RR) was a plastic surgery refining cosmesis of the BR. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess disease outcomes and MRC. Cox regression was used to assess predictors of MRC. Results: Seventy-three courses of PMPRT were delivered to 68 women with BR between 2013 and 2021. Median follow-up was 42.1 months. Median age was 47 years. Fifty-six (76.7%) courses used pencil beam scanning PMPRT. Of 73 BR, 29 were flaps (39.7%), 30 implants (41.1%), and 14 TE (19.2%) at time of irradiation. There were 20 (27.4%) RR. There were 9 (12.3%) MRC among 5 implants, 2 flaps, and 2 TE, occurring a median of 29 months from PMPRT start. Three-year freedom from MRC was 86.9%. Three (4.1%) of the MRC were absolute reconstruction failure. Complications leading to MRC included capsular contracture in 5, fat necrosis in 2, and infection in 2. On univariable analysis, BR type, boost, proton technique, age, and smoking status were not associated with MRC, whereas higher body mass index trended toward significance (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.99-1.16; P = .10). Conclusions: Patients undergoing PMPRT to BR had a 12.3% incidence of major complications leading to surgical intervention, and total loss of BR was rare. MRC rates were similar among reconstruction types. Minor surgery for RR is common in our practice. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction
    Carnevale, Alessia
    Scaringi, Claudia
    Scalabrino, Giovanna
    Campanella, Barbara
    Osti, Mattia Falchetto
    De Sanctis, Vitaliana
    Valeriani, Maurizio
    Minniti, Giuseppe
    Amanti, Claudio
    Santanelli, Fabio
    Enrici, Riccardo Maurizi
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (07): : 1240 - 1250
  • [32] Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy
    Elswick, Sarah M.
    Harless, Christin A.
    Bishop, Sarah N.
    Schleck, Cathy D.
    Mandrekar, Jay
    Reusche, Ryan D.
    Mutter, Robert W.
    Boughey, Judy C.
    Jacobson, Steven R.
    Lemaine, Valerie
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [33] Immediate Breast Reconstruction Allows for the Timely Initiation of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy
    Shammas, Ronnie L.
    Ren, Yi
    Thomas, Samantha M.
    Hollenbeck, Scott T.
    Greenup, Rachel A.
    Blitzblau, Rachel C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (03) : 347E - 357E
  • [34] A Comparative Analysis of Immediate and Delayed-immediate Breast Reconstruction after Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy
    Christopher, Adrienne N.
    Morris, Martin P.
    Broach, Robyn B.
    Serletti, Joseph M.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2022, 38 (06) : 499 - 505
  • [35] Helical Tomotherapy (HT) for Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) Treatment after Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Dejean, R.
    Chaltiel, L.
    Hangard, G.
    Jouve, E.
    Izar, F.
    Chira, C. I.
    Gangloff, D.
    De lafontan, B.
    Dalenc, F.
    Moyal, E.
    Massabeau, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E583 - E583
  • [36] Postmastectomy Reconstruction in Male Breast Cancer
    Deldar, Romina
    Sayyed, Adaah A.
    Towfighi, Parhom
    Aminpour, Nathan
    Sogunro, Olutayo
    Son, Jennifer D.
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Song, David H.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2022, 2022 : 5482261
  • [37] A SURVEY OF AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND BREAST SURGEONS' CURRENT ATTITUDES TO BREAST RECONSTRUCTION IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER NEEDING POSTMASTECTOMY RADIATION THERAPY
    Meybodi, F.
    Sood, S.
    Samarasinghe, P.
    French, J.
    Elder, E.
    BREAST, 2018, 38 : 195 - 195
  • [38] Breast Reconstruction With Postmastectomy Radiation: Choices and Tradeoffs
    Poppe, Matthew M.
    Agarwal, Jayant P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (22) : 2467 - +
  • [39] Disparities in the Use of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy for Inflammatory Breast Cancer
    Loveland-Jones, Catherine
    Lin, Heather
    Shen, Yu
    Bedrosian, Isabelle
    Shaitelman, Simona
    Kuerer, Henry
    Woodward, Wendy
    Ueno, Naoto
    Valero, Vicente
    Babiera, Gildy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (04): : 1218 - 1225
  • [40] Influence of Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Fractionated Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients With Reconstruction
    Kim, Dong-Yun
    Park, Eonju
    Heo, Chan Yeong
    Jin, Ung Sik
    Kim, Eun Kyu
    Han, Wonshik
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    Kim, In Ah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 112 (02): : 445 - 456