Systemic antibiotics are not required for successful two-stage revision hip arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Petrie, M. J. [1 ]
Panchani, S. [1 ,2 ]
Al-Einzy, M. [1 ,3 ]
Partridge, D. [1 ]
Harrison, T. P. [1 ]
Stockley, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Wrightington Wigan & Leigh NHS Fdn Trust, Wigan, England
[3] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2023年 / 105B卷 / 05期
关键词
PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; EXCHANGE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; STAGE REVISION; MANAGEMENT; BONE; LONG;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.105B5.BJJ-2022-0373
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The duration of systemic antibiotic treatment following first-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is contentious. Our philosophy is to perform an aggressive debridement, and to use a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics in cement beads and systemic prophylactic antibiotics alone. The aim of this study was to assess the success of this philosophy in the management of PJI of the hip using our two-stage protocol. Methods The study involved a retrospective review of our prospectively collected database from which we identified all patients who underwent an intended two-stage revision for PJI of the hip. All patients had a diagnosis of PJI according to the major criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2013, a minimum five-year follow-up, and were assessed using the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool. The outcomes were grouped into 'successful' or 'unsuccessful'. Results A total of 299 two-stage revision THAs in 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 258 (86%) proceeded to second-stage surgery. Their mean age was 68.1 years (28 to 92). The median follow-up was 10.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 6.3 to 15.0). A 91% success rate was seen in those patients who underwent reimplantation, decreasing to 86% when including those who did not proceed to reimplantation. The median duration of postoperative systemic antibiotics following the first stage was five days (IQR 5 to 9). There was no significant difference in outcome between those patients who were treated with antibiotics for = 48 hours (p = 0.961) or = five days (p = 0.376) compared with those who were treated with longer courses. Greater success rates were seen for Gram-positive PJIs (87%) than for Gram-negative (84%) and mixed-oGram PJIs (72%; p = 0.098). Conclusion Aggressive surgical debridement with a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics at the time of first-stage revision surgery for PJI of the hip, without prolonged systemic antibiotics, provides a high rate of success, responsible antibiotic stewardship, and reduced hospital costs.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 517
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Infection Is Associated with a High Rate of Dislocation
    McAlister, Ian P.
    Perry, Kevin I.
    Mara, Kristin C.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (04): : 322 - 329
  • [22] Articular spacers in two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection of the hip and the knee
    Craig, Andy
    King, S. W.
    van Duren, B. H.
    Veysi, V. T.
    Jain, S.
    Palan, J.
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2022, 7 (02) : 137 - 152
  • [23] Complications of Resection Arthroplasty in Two-Stage Revision for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection
    Sigmund, Irene K.
    Winkler, Tobias
    Oender, Nuri
    Perka, Carsten
    Renz, Nora
    Trampuz, Andrej
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (12)
  • [24] Preformed gentamicin spacers in two-stage revision hip arthroplasty: functional results and complications
    Christophe Pattyn
    Thomas De Geest
    Pieter Ackerman
    Emmanuel Audenaert
    International Orthopaedics, 2011, 35 : 1471 - 1476
  • [25] Two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty
    Fowler, Timothy J.
    Sayers, Adrian
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [26] Successful Two-Stage Revision of Lactobacillus Infection of a Total Knee Arthroplasty and Literature Review
    Jacobson, Nathan
    Milshteyn, Michael
    Teitge, Robert
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2014, 15 (05) : 635 - 639
  • [27] Liquid Gentamicin in Bone Cement Spacers: In Vivo Antibiotic Release and Systemic Safety in Two-Stage Revision of Infected Hip Arthroplasty
    Hsieh, Pang-Hsin
    Huang, Kuo-Chin
    Tai, Ching-Lung
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 66 (03): : 804 - 808
  • [28] Comparison of One-Stage Revision With Antibiotic Cement Versus Two-Stage Revision Results for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Choi, Ho-Rim
    Kwon, Young-Min
    Freiberg, Andrew A.
    Malchau, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (08): : 66 - 70
  • [29] Interleukin-6 in two-stage revision arthroplasty
    Hoell, S.
    Borgers, L.
    Gosheger, G.
    Dieckmann, R.
    Schulz, D.
    Gerss, J.
    Hardes, J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (01): : 71 - 75
  • [30] The management of infected elbow arthroplasty by two-stage revision
    Rudge, Will B. J.
    Eseonu, Kelechi
    Brown, Matthew
    Warren, Simon
    Majed, Addie
    Bayley, Ian L.
    Lambert, Simon M.
    Higgs, Deborah
    Falworth, Mark
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (05) : 879 - 886