Why the Secular Academy Needs Cross-Cultural Religious Literacy
被引:0
|
作者:
Wellman Jr, James K.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Washington, Jackson Sch Int Studies, Comparat Relig Program, Seattle, WA 98195 USAUniv Washington, Jackson Sch Int Studies, Comparat Relig Program, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
Wellman Jr, James K.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Washington, Jackson Sch Int Studies, Comparat Relig Program, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源:
REVIEW OF FAITH & INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
|
2024年
/
22卷
/
01期
关键词:
none zone;
radical empiricism;
secularism;
secular prejudice;
religious flourishing;
academia;
religious literacy;
D O I:
10.1080/15570274.2024.2303295
中图分类号:
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号:
010107 ;
摘要:
I make the empirical argument that most of humankind and much of the academy practices one form of religion and/or spiritual practice. And yet, in public life, secularity is assumed and regularized as rational and life giving. Recent science shows the power of spirituality and religion for human flourishing. And yet, many secularists diminish religion and assume the worst about it without evidence. I argue that cross-cultural religious literacy (CCRL) is and can be an essential tool toward greater public understanding and a more productive dialogue between religionists and secularists in the academy and beyond.