Reproductive advantage of the winners of male-male competition in Drosophila prolongata

被引:5
|
作者
Amino, Kai [1 ]
Matsuo, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Agr & Environm Biol, Lab Appl Entomol, 1-1-1 Yayoi,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138657, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Resource defence; Mating system; Courtship; Sexual dimorphism; Deep-learning-based automated behaviour; analysis system; SEXUAL-DIMORPHISM; BODY-SIZE; COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR; FEMALE CHOICE; SELECTION; TERRITORIALITY; DOMINANCE; CONSEQUENCES; DEFINITIONS; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104831
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the resource-defence mating system, where males compete for limited resources to acquire females, male traits associated with fighting ability are selected, leading to the evolution of sexual dimorphism. However, the evo-lution of sexual dimorphism is also driven by other mechanisms, such as female selection. Therefore, to elucidate the evolutionary mechanisms of male traits, it is necessary to clarify their contribution to fitness through male -male competition. In this regard, it is surprising that numerous studies on sexually dimorphic species have assumed the resource-defence mating system without directly examining the relationship between resource-defending behaviour and mating success. In a sexually dimorphic fruit fly, Drosophila prolongata, the presence of the resource-defence mating system has been suggested, but technical difficulties had prevented spatial quantification of the resource-defending behaviour. In this study, by using an automated behaviour analysis tool previously developed, we located the occurrence of male-male competition and courtship to investigate their relationship in D. prolongata, considering the position of food resources. We found that the male-male compe-tition led to the exclusive occupation of resources, increasing the courtship opportunities of the resource holders. These results illustrate the importance of resource-defending for reproductive success in D. prolongata.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Perception of male-male competition influences Drosophila copulation behaviour even in species where females rarely remate
    Lize, Anne
    Doff, Rowan J.
    Smaller, Eve A.
    Lewis, Zenobia
    Hurst, Gregory D. D.
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 8 (01) : 35 - 38
  • [42] Same-sex sexual behaviour as a by-product of reproductive strategy under male-male scramble competition
    Han, Chang S.
    Brooks, Robert C.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 108 : 193 - 197
  • [43] Fight outcome influences male mating success in Drosophila prolongata
    Toyoshima, Naoki
    Matsuo, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF ETHOLOGY, 2023, 41 (02) : 119 - 127
  • [44] Fight outcome influences male mating success in Drosophila prolongata
    Naoki Toyoshima
    Takashi Matsuo
    Journal of Ethology, 2023, 41 : 119 - 127
  • [45] Effects of testosterone on male-male competition and male-female interactions in blue tits
    Katharina Foerster
    Bart Kempenaers
    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2005, 57 : 215 - 223
  • [46] Sexual Selection on male cuticular hydrocarbons via male-male competition and female choice
    Lane, S. M.
    Dickinson, A. W.
    Tregenza, T.
    House, C. M.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2016, 29 (07) : 1346 - 1355
  • [47] Selectivity and Plasticity in a Sound-Evoked Male-Male Interaction in Drosophila
    Yoon, Jeonghyeon
    Matsuo, Eriko
    Yamada, Daichi
    Mizuno, Hiroshi
    Morimoto, Takako
    Miyakawa, Hiroyoshi
    Kinoshita, Setsuo
    Ishimoto, Hiroshi
    Kamikouchi, Azusa
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):
  • [48] Fighting without weaponry: a review of male-male contest competition in butterflies
    Kemp, DJ
    Wiklund, C
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2001, 49 (06) : 429 - 442
  • [49] Parasites, male-male competition and female mate choice in the sand goby
    Barber, I
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2002, 61 (01) : 185 - 198
  • [50] Male-male competition is not costly to dominant males in a cooperatively breeding bird
    Martha J. Nelson-Flower
    Amanda R. Ridley
    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2015, 69 : 1997 - 2004