Coseismic and early postseismic deformation of the 2020 Nima Mw 6.4 earthquake, central Tibet, from InSAR and GNSS observations

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Xiaoli [1 ]
Xia, Tao [1 ]
Liu-Zeng, Jing [2 ]
Deng, Debeier [1 ]
Jia, Zhige [1 ]
Wang, Peng [3 ]
Yu, Pengfei [1 ]
Wang, Wenqing [4 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Seismol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Earth Syst Sci, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Monitoring & Applicat Ctr China Earthquake Adm, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
normal faulting earthquake; 2020 Nima earthquake; InSAR; GNSS; coseismic deformation; postseismic deformation; Tibetan plateau; FAULT PLANE SOLUTIONS; SURFACE DEFORMATION; ACTIVE TECTONICS; PLATEAU; SHEAR; MECHANICS; EXTENSION; INVERSION; INSIGHT; RATES;
D O I
10.3389/feart.2022.1012773
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The 2020 Mw6.4 Nima earthquake is one of the largest normal-faulting earthquakes recently occurring north of the Banggong suture zone in remote central Tibet, where geologic investigation of active faults is extremely limited. We analyze jointly InSAR and GNSS observations over 9 months after the Nima earthquake and calculate the coseismic and postseismic displacement. The optimal coseismic slip model suggests this event is the result of moderate-angle down-dip slip on a complex reversed "S-shape " three-segmented structure at fault junctions of the West Yibu-Chaka fault, the Heishi fault, and an unmapped blind fault, with a small component of left-lateral slip. The superposition of seismic waves from faults with different strikes and dips accounted for a large non-double-couple component in the long-period point-source solutions. The geodetic moment released by the mainshock is 6.4 x 10(18) N.m, equivalent to Mw 6.42. Coseismic rupture concentrated at a depth of 4-15 km, with a peak slip of 1.36 m at 8.5 km depth. The cumulative afterslip moment within 9 months after the mainshock is 1 x 10(18) N m, about 15.6% of that released by the mainshock coseismic slip. The afterslips contributed largely to the release of additional strain energy. In addition, shallow creep on the northern part of the blind fault, and deep uplift on the east normal fault system are promoted by stress perturbations. A significant proportion of down-dip coseismic slip spreading to more than 20 km beneath the surface, and deep up-slip afterslip have implications for the rheology of down-dip extension of the dipping faults in northern Tibet. Two obvious stress loading zones of more than 1 bar highlight seismic hazards in the region, especially in the junction between normal faults and ends of the large-size sinistral Riganpei-Co and Jiangai-Zangbu faults. It is necessary to forecast accurately by longer-term afterslip observation over timescales of years for the faults. Compared with previous studies, our results suggest a more complex subsurface fault geometry linking the normal and strike-slip faults and dynamic stress adjustment in this poorly-known region of Tibet.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] El Mayor-Cucapah ( Mw 7.2) earthquake: Early near-field postseismic deformation from InSAR and GPS observations
    Gonzalez-Ortega, Alejandro
    Fialko, Yuri
    Sandwell, David
    Alejandro Nava-Pichardo, F.
    Fletcher, John
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Javier
    Lipovsky, Brad
    Floyd, Michael
    Funning, Gareth
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2014, 119 (02) : 1482 - 1497
  • [22] Coseismic Deformation and Slip Distribution of the 2022 Luding Mw 6.6 Earthquake Revealed by InSAR Observations
    Han B.
    Liu Z.
    Chen B.
    Li Z.
    Yu C.
    Zhang Y.
    Peng J.
    Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48 (01): : 36 - 46
  • [23] Coseismic deformation and stress triggering of the 2021 MS6.4 Yangbi earthquake inverted from integrating GNSS and InSAR displacement fields
    Wang, Xiaoyi
    Xu, Keke
    Liu, Xinqi
    Zhang, Mosi
    Wang, Shuaipeng
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2023, 72 (02) : 458 - 470
  • [24] Coseismic deformation from the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake as inferred from InSAR and GPS observations
    Simons, M
    Fialko, Y
    Rivera, L
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2002, 92 (04) : 1390 - 1402
  • [25] Afterslip on Conjugate Faults of the 2020 Mw 6.3 Nima Earthquake in the Central Tibetan Plateau: Evidence from InSAR Measurements
    Hong, Shunying
    Liu, Mian
    Zhou, Xin
    Meng, Guojie
    Dong, Yanfang
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2023, 113 (05) : 2026 - 2040
  • [26] Refined Coseismic Slip and Afterslip Distributions of the 2021 Mw 6.1 Yangbi Earthquake Based on GNSS and InSAR Observations
    Liu, Zheng
    Zhang, Keliang
    Gan, Weijun
    Liang, Shiming
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [27] Improved Coseismic Slip Model of Menyuan MW 6.6 Earthquake, Qinghai Province in 2022 Derived from Gnss and Insar Observations
    Su, Xiaoning
    Bao, Qinghua
    Zhao, Lijiang
    Xiong, Renwei
    Shi, Ruijuan
    Zhang, Jingzhong
    SSRN, 2023,
  • [28] Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation of the 5 January 2013 Mw 7.5 Craig Earthquake from Static and Kinematic GPS Solutions
    Ding, Kaihua
    Freymueller, Jeffrey T.
    Wang, Qi
    Zou, Rong
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2015, 105 (2B) : 1153 - 1164
  • [29] Tectonic and Geometric Control on Fault Kinematics of the 2021 Mw7.3 Maduo (China) Earthquake Inferred From Interseismic, Coseismic, and Postseismic InSAR Observations
    Zhao, Dezheng
    Qu, Chunyan
    Chen, Han
    Shan, Xinjian
    Song, Xiaogang
    Gong, Wenyu
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (18)
  • [30] Estimating Coseismic Deformation of Southwestern Puerto Rico from the 7 January 2020 Mw 6.4 Earthquake: Constraints from Campaign and Continuous GPS
    Lopez-Venegas, Alberto M.
    Mattioli, Glen S.
    Solares-Colon, Margarita
    Mencin, David
    Jansma, Pamela E.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2023, 113 (01) : 99 - 114